The periventricular zone of cerebellum is a germinative niche during the embryonic development, nevertheless its structural organization and functional implications in adult have not been widely studied. Here we disclose the presence of two novel clusters of cells in that area. The first one was named the subventricular cellular cluster (SVCC) and is composed of cells that express glial and neuronal markers. The second was named the ventromedial cord (VMC) and appears as a streak of biciliated cells with microvillosities facing the ventricle, that includes GFAP+ and nestin+ cells organized along the periventricular vasculature. The dorsal limit of the SVCC is associated with myelinated axons of neurons of unknown origin. This paper describes the characteristics and organization of these groups of cells. They can be observed from late embryonic development in the transgenic mouse line GFAP-GFP. The SVCC and VMC expand during early postnatal development but are restricted to the central area of the ventricle in adulthood. We did not find evidence of cell proliferation, cell migration or the presence of fenestrated blood vessels. These findings provide new insights into the knowledge of the cellular composition and structural organization of the periventricular zone of cerebellum.

The cerebellum harbors a specialized area on the roof of the fourth ventricle that is composed of glial cells and neurons that interface with the cerebrospinal fluid. This region includes the so-called ventromedial cord (VMC), which is composed of cells that are glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive and nestin-positive and distributes along the midline in association with blood vessels. We hypothesized that these cells should compare to GFAP and nestin-positive cells that are known to exist in other areas of the brain, which undergo proliferation and differentiation under hypoxic conditions. Thus, we tested whether cells of the VMC would display a similar reaction to hypoxic preconditioning (HPC). Indeed, we found that the VMC does respond to HPC by reorganizing its cellular components before it gradually returns to its basal state after about a week. This response we documented by monitoring global changes in the expression of GFAP-EGFP in transgenic mice, using light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) revealed a dramatic loss of EGFP upon HPC, and was paralleled by retraction of Bergmann glial cell processes. This EGFP loss was supported by western blot analysis, which also showed a loss in the astrocyte-markers GFAP and ALDH1L1. On the other hand, other cell-markers appeared to be upregulated in the blots (including nestin, NeuN, and Iba1). Finally, we found that HPC does not remarkably affect the incorporation of BrdU into cells on the cerebellum, but strongly augments BrdU incorporation into periventricular cells on the floor of the fourth ventricle over the adjacent medulla. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Honoring Ricardo Miledi -outstanding neuroscientist of XX-XXI centuries.

No abstract

No abstract

Chitosan and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) are non-toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible polymers extensively used in regenerative medicine. However, it is unknown whether the chemical combination of these polymers can produce a biomaterial that induces an appropriate cellular response in vitro in mammalian cells. This study aimed to test the ability of a novel salt-leached polyurethane scaffold of chitosan grafted with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) to support the growth of three mammalian cell lines of different origin: a) HEK-293 cells, b) i28 mouse myoblasts, and c) human dermal fibroblasts. The viability of the cells was assessed by either evaluation of their capacity to maintain the expression of the green fluorescent protein by adenoviral transduction or by esterase activity and plasma membrane integrity. The results indicated that the three cell lines attached well to the scaffold; however, when i28 cells were induced to differentiate, they did not produce morphologically distinct myofibers, and cell growth ceased. In conclusion, the findings reveal that, altogether, these observations suggest that this foam scaffold supports cell growth and proliferation but may not apply to all cell types. Hence, one crucial question yet to be resolved is a poly (saccharide-ester-urethane) derivative with a nano-topography that elicits a similar cellular response for different biological environments.