Objective To investigate the potential of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) as a treatment for chronic primary insomnia. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting University health center. Patients 30 adults with primary chronic insomnia based on DSM-IV-TR criteria were randomized 2:1 to MBSR or pharmacotherapy (PCT). Interventions MBSR, a program of mindfulness meditation training consisting of 8 weekly 2.5 hour classes and a day-long retreat, with ongoing home meditation practice expectations during 3 month follow-up; PCT, consisting of 3 mg of eszopiclone (LUNESTA™) nightly for 8 weeks, followed by 3 months of use as needed. A 10-minute sleep hygiene presentation was included in both interventions. Main Outcomes The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), sleep diaries and wrist actigraphy collected pre-treatment, post-treatment (8 weeks), and at 5 months (self-reports only). Results Between baseline and 8-weeks, sleep onset latency measured by actigraphy decreased 8.9 minutes in the MBSR arm (P<.05). Large, significant improvements were found on the ISI, PSQI, and diary-measured total sleep time, sleep onset latency and sleep efficiency (Ps<.01, all) from baseline to 5 month follow-up in the MBSR arm. Changes of comparable magnitude were found in the PCT arm. 27 out of 30 patients completed their assigned treatment. This study provides initial evidence for the efficacy of MBSR as a viable treatment for chronic insomnia as measured by: sleep diary, actigraphy, well-validated sleep scales and measures of remission and clinical recovery.
• Background Demand for complementary and alternative therapies is increasing and is affecting all healthcare settings, including critical care. • Methods A random sample of members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was surveyed to determine the members’ attitudes, knowledge, perspectives, and use of complementary and alternative therapies. • Results Most of the 726 respondents were using one or more complementary and alternative therapies in practice. The most common therapies used were diet, exercise, relaxation techniques, and prayer. A majority of the nurses had some knowledge of more than half of the 28 therapies listed on the survey, and a majority desired additional training for 25 therapies. Respondents generally required more evidence judged as essential to use or recommend conventional therapy than to use or recommend complementary and alternative therapies. Nurses viewed complementary and alternative therapies positively overall, were open to use of the therapies, and perceived them as legitimate and beneficial to patients. Nurses judged the therapies helpful for treatment of a variety of symptoms. A majority of nurses desired an increase in the availability of the therapies for patients, patients’ families, and nursing staff. Nurses’ professional use of the therapies was related to having more knowledge of them, perceiving benefits of them, total number of therapies they recommended to patients, personal use, and affiliation with a mainstream religion. • Conclusions Educational programs that provide information about use of complementary and alternative therapies and the underlying evidence base most likely will increase the appropriate use of the therapies to achieve desired outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.