Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of training and institutionalizing teamwork behaviors, drawn from aviation crew resource management (CRM) programs, on emergency department (ED) staff organized into caregiver teams. Study Setting. Nine teaching and community hospital EDs. Study Design. A prospective multicenter evaluation using a quasi-experimental, untreated control group design with one pretest and two posttests of the Emergency Team Coordination Course TM (ETCC). The experimental group, comprised of 684 physicians, nurses, and technicians, received the ETCC and implemented formal teamwork structures and processes. Assessments occurred prior to training, and at intervals of four and eight months after training. Three outcome constructs were evaluated: team behavior, ED performance, and attitudes and opinions. Trained observers rated ED staff team behaviors and made observations of clinical errors, a measure of ED performance. Staff and patients in the EDs completed surveys measuring attitudes and opinions. Data Collection. Hospital EDs were the units of analysis for the seven outcome measures. Prior to aggregating data at the hospital level, scale properties of surveys and event-related observations were evaluated at the respondent or case level. Principal Findings. A statistically significant improvement in quality of team behaviors was shown between the experimental and control groups following training ( p 5 .012). Subjective workload was not affected by the intervention ( p 5 .668). The clinical error rate significantly decreased from 30.9 percent to 4.4 percent in the experimental group ( p 5 .039). In the experimental group, the ED staffs' attitudes toward teamwork increased ( p 5 .047) and staff assessments of institutional support showed a significant increase ( p 5 .040). Conclusion. Our findings point to the effectiveness of formal teamwork training for improving team behaviors, reducing errors, and improving staff attitudes among the ETCC-trained hospitals.

No abstract

Objective: To determine if high fidelity simulation based team training can improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum. Setting: Level 1 trauma center and academic emergency medicine training program. Participants: Emergency department (ED) staff including nurses, technicians, emergency medicine residents, and attending physicians. Intervention : ED staff who had recently received didactic training in the Emergency Team Coordination Course (ETCCH) also received an 8 hour intensive experience in an ED simulator in which three scenarios of graduated difficulty were encountered. A comparison group, also ETCC trained, was assigned to work together in the ED for one 8 hour shift. Experimental and comparison teams were observed in the ED before and after the intervention. Design: Single, crossover, prospective, blinded and controlled observational study. Teamwork ratings using previously validated behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were completed by outside trained observers in the ED. Observers were blinded to the identification of the teams. Results: There were no significant differences between experimental and comparison groups at baseline. The experimental team showed a trend towards improvement in the quality of team behavior (p = 0.07); the comparison group showed no change in team behavior during the two observation periods (p = 0.55). Members of the experimental team rated simulation based training as a useful educational method. Conclusion: High fidelity medical simulation appears to be a promising method for enhancing didactic teamwork training. This approach, using a number of patients, is more representative of clinical care and is therefore the proper paradigm in which to perform teamwork training. It is, however, unclear how much simulator based training must augment didactic teamwork training for clinically meaningful differences to become apparent.T eamwork training has made a fundamental impact on error reduction and human performance improvement in a number of commercial areas such as aviation 1 2 and other major industries. Aviation provides a good example of how simulation experts and human factors psychologists have collaborated to produce flight simulators that are intended to train and test both crew technical and human interaction skills. Medicine has had a long history of training and testing caregiver clinical skills and performance that is primarily individually oriented. As a result of traditional training and norms, physicians in particular tend to function autonomously. Some clinical tasks are easily simulated and are measurable in environments such as those used in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses. Less importance has been assigned to training and assessing teamwork skills. Despite the prominent role that teams play in delivering health care, opportunities to formally practise teamwork skills and receive expert feedback do not exist. A recent Institute of Medicine report 3 reminds u...

No abstract

Team performance measurement is a critical and frequently overlooked component of an effective simulation-based training system designed to build teamwork competencies. Quality team performance measurement is essential for systematically diagnosing team performance and subsequently making decisions concerning feedback and remediation. However, the complexities of team performance pose a challenge to effectively measuring team performance. This article synthesizes the scientific literature on this topic and provides a set of best practices for designing and implementing team performance measurement systems in simulation-based training.

No abstract

No abstract

I.