It has been found that many organisations still fail to meet the basic rights of those in their care, in terms of access to food, drink and support when they need it. In acknowledgment that food service in hospitals must be given a higher priority, and be recognised as an integral part of the patient's treatment and care, Irish hospitals must now have a system to evaluate the nutritional and hydrational care for patients admitted to hospital. The purpose of this audit was to examine the level of mealtime support available to patients during the main mealtime service in our hospital. As the audit highlighted the need to alter ward processes around the mealtime service, quality improvement initiatives were introduced. These initiatives had a positive impact, enabling ward staff to improve adequacy of mealtime support to patients, leading to better patient quality care at this time.
Study aims were to validate agreement between the weighed intake method and the EWFRC record and to assess the effectiveness of the tool for identification of nutritional risk. Data was collected from 35 patients (male n¼16, female n¼19) over a consecutive three day period on two acute medical wards. 393 meals were weighed pre and post-delivery to patients over three meal occasions (breakfast, lunch and evening meal) and compared with intake recorded on the EWFRC. Comparison of means was conducted using ANOVA. Agreement between the weighed intake and EWFRC methods was tested using Bland-Altman plots (CI¼95%) with linear regression analysis used to determine significance (p¼0.05). Overall limits of agreement between the EWFRC and the weighed intake method were wide (À75.1 e +100%), therefore, do not accurately represent oral intake. Non-contemporaneous completion of the EWFRC based on patient recall may have influenced this result. Narrow limits of agreement were demonstrated (À17-19.5, p¼0.944) for 49 meals, which suggests that the EWFRC has potential to accurately represent oral intake when completed contemporaneously after direct observation of the meal. 18 patients remained on the ward for the duration of the three day period and their data was analysed to validate the accuracy of the EWFRC for prediction of nutritional risk. Comparison of nutritional risk between the two methods did not reach statistical significance. The EWFRC identified patients at low (n¼9 vs n¼10 from weighed intake), moderate (n¼1 vs n¼2 from weighed intake) and high nutritional risk (n¼5 vs n¼6 from weighed intake). The EWFRC is, therefore, a valid tool for prediction of nutritional risk over a three day period and may accurately record oral intake if completed contemporaneously and when meals have been observed. References [1] Palmer M, Miller K, Noble S. The accuracy of food intake charts completed by nursing staff as part of usual care when no additional training in completing intake tools is provided. Clin Nutr.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.