This study was undertaken to determine retrospectively the prevalence and histologic features of the atypical foci that are suspicious for but are not diagnostic of a malignancy in contemporary prostate needle biopsy specimens reported in a community practice. Histologic features were examined in detail to identify features that prevented an unequivocal diagnosis of carcinoma. Of 1,009 prostate needle biopsy specimens obtained between January 1,1993, and August 1, 1995, the diagnosis of an atypical focus suspicious for malignancy was made in 48 (4.8%). In review of the biopsy specimens diagnosed as benign, an additional 7 cases (0.7%) were identified.The following histologic features were identified in 54 cases: enlarged nucleoli, 54 (100%); enlarged nuclei, 45 (83%); intraluminal eosinophilic secretions, 40 (74%); infiltrative growth, 37 (68%); small acinar proliferation, 37 (68%); intraluminal basophilic mucin, 23 (42%); amphophilic cytoplasm, 18 (33%); high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 17 (31%); and crystalloids, 12 (22%). Corpora amylacea were not identified. The foci contained from 1 to 67 acini (mean, 20.7). Although each atypical focus showed most of the features of adenocarcinoma, an unequivocal diagnosis of malignancy was not given owing to four features: the small size of the focus, the small number of cells with enlarged nucleoli, the clustered growth pattern, and the The use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for early detection of prostate cancer has resulted in a marked increase in the number of prostate needle biopsy specimens evaluated by our community pathology practice group. These specimens often contain atypical small acinar proliferations that are suspicious but not diagnostic of adenocarcinoma. The foci are usually too small to presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia within many of the foci.At initial examination, 36 of 41 patients (83%) had an elevated serum concentration of prostate-specific antigen (mean, 10 ng/mL), and 20 (49%) had abnormal findings on a digital rectal examination. Twenty-five patients (46%) underwent additional sampling of the prostate, and 15 of these (60%) were found to have adenocarcinoma; the remaining 30 patients did not undergo a subsequent biopsy. Patients with subsequent cancer had higher mean serum concentrations of prostate-specific antigen and change in concentrations of prostate-specific antigen than those whose repeat biopsy results were negative; no other clinical or histologic differences were observed between these two groups. To the community pathologists in this study, the lack of prominent nucleoli, the small size of the focus, clustered acini, and/or adjacent highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia prevented an unequivocal diagnosis of malignancy. If a prostate needle biopsy specimen is reported as containing an atypical focus suspicious for malignancy, a subsequent biopsy is warranted given the high predictive value for adenocarcinoma. (Key words: Prostate; Atypia; Needle biopsy; Adenocarcinoma; Prostati...

Between 1980 and 1989, 94 patients were evaluated for upper tract urothelial tumors. Preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans and pathology reports were available in 30 patients who also had nephroureterectomy for treatment of transitional cell carcinoma. Retrospective evaluation of these CT scans was done without knowledge of the final pathological status to determine accuracy of tumor detection and staging. Pathological findings were also reviewed and the pathological staging was compared to that of CT. At pathological evaluation the 30 renal units contained 34 grossly visible, distinct papillary tumors: 7 were ureteral and 27 were in the renal pelvis. Of the renal units 8 also contained carcinoma in situ that was not visible on any study. Conventional excretory urograms and/or retrograde or antegrade pyelograms detected 28 (82%) and CT 17 (50%) of the 34 papillary tumors. Excluding suboptimal scans due to early generation machines, inadequate intravenous contrast medium or too widely spaced slices caused CT sensitivity to increase to 15 of 22 (68%). It was not possible to distinguish stages Ta to T2 lesions on any radiological study. CT sensitivity for parenchymal invasion was 75% with a specificity of 43%. CT sensitivity for fat invasion was 67% with a specificity of 44%. We conclude that CT is limited in usefulness for detection and staging of low stage upper tract urothelial tumors. While CT is the best current imaging modality over-all for staging of upper tract urothelial tumors, results obtained in low stage tumors must be viewed with caution particularly when precise preoperative clinical staging is essential, such as before nephron-sparing procedures.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract