Plant defence compounds occur in floral nectar, but their ecological role is not well-understood. We provide the first evidence that plant compounds pharmacologically alter pollinator behaviour by enhancing their memory of reward. Honeybees rewarded with caffeine, which occurs naturally in nectar of Coffea and Citrus species, were three times more likely to remember a learned floral scent than those rewarded with sucrose alone. Caffeine potentiated responses of mushroom body neurons involved in olfactory learning and memory by acting as an adenosine receptor antagonist. Caffeine concentrations in nectar never exceeded the bees' bitter taste threshold, implying that pollinators impose selection for nectar that is pharmacologically active but not repellent. By using a drug to enhance memories of reward, plants secure pollinator fidelity and improve reproductive success.Many drugs commonly consumed by humans are produced by plants as a form of toxic defence against herbivores (1, 2). While plant-derived drugs like caffeine or nicotine are lethal in high doses (3-5), they have pharmacological effects at low doses that affect mammalian behaviour. For example, low doses of caffeine are mildly rewarding and enhance cognitive performance and memory retention (6). Interestingly, caffeine has been detected in low doses in the floral nectar and pollen of Citrus (7), but whether it has an ecological function is unknown.Two caffeine-producing plant genera, Citrus and Coffea, have large floral displays with strong scents and produce more fruits and seeds when pollinated by bees (8, 9). If caffeine confers a selective advantage when these plants interact with pollinators, we might expect it to be commonly encountered in nectar. We measured caffeine in the nectar of 3 species of Coffea (C. canephora, C. arabica, and C. liberica) and 4 species of Citrus (C. paradisi, C. maxima, C. sinesis, C. reticulata) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (10, Fig. Europe PMC Funders Group Europe PMC Funders Author ManuscriptsEurope PMC Funders Author Manuscripts S1A). When caffeine was present, its concentration ranged from 0.003 -0.253 mM. The median caffeine concentration in both genera was not significantly different (Fig. 1A, MannWhitney, Z = −1.09, P = 0.272). Caffeine was more common in the nectar of C. canephora than in C. arabica or C. liberica (Coffea: logistic regression χ 2 2 = 11.1, P = 0.004); it was always present in Citrus nectar. The mean total nectar sugar concentration ranged from 0.338-0.843 M (Fig. 1B, see Fig S1B for individual sugars). Caffeine concentration in nectar did not correlate with total sugar concentration (Pearson's r = 0.063, P = 0.596).We hypothesized that caffeine could affect the learning and memory of foraging pollinators.To test this, we trained individual honeybees to associate floral scent with 0.7 M sucrose and 7 different concentrations of caffeine and tested their olfactory memory. Using a method for classical conditioning of feeding responses (proboscis extension reflex, 11), bees...
We investigated whether the interaction between the N-ethyl-maleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) and the AMPA receptor (AMPAR) subunit GluR2 is involved in synaptic plasticity in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Blockade of the NSF-GluR2 interaction by a specific peptide (pep2m) introduced into neurons prevented homosynaptic, de novo long-term depression (LTD). Moreover, saturation of LTD prevented the pep2m-induced reduction in AMPAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Minimal stimulation experiments indicated that both pep2m action and LTD were due to changes in quantal size and quantal content but were not associated with changes in AMPAR single-channel conductance or EPSC kinetics. These results suggest that there is a pool of AMPARs dependent on the NSF-GluR2 interaction and that LTD expression involves the removal of these receptors from synapses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.