The authors reviewed the other articles in the special section and commented on the use of psychological assessment to plan treatment. They call this view of assessment the information-gathering paradigm, because the goal is to collect data that will aid in communication and decision making about clients. This contrasts with the therapeutic model of assessment, in which the major goal is to produce positive change in clients. The authors summarized evidence of the efficacy of assessment as a brief therapy and discussed its possible therapeutic mechanisms. The information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment are complementary rather than mutually exclusive, and both speak to the utility of assessment. The current crisis in the clinical use of psychological assessment may be due in part to an overemphasis on the information-gathering model.
This study investigated the benefits of sharing Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) test results verbally with clients. Ss were randomly selected from a college counseling center's waiting list: 32 received test feedback according to a collaborative model developed by Finn (1990) and 29 received only examiner attention. Groups did not differ on age, sex, days between examiner contact, and initial levels of distress and self-esteem. Compared with the controls, clients who completed the MMPI-2 and heard their test results reported a significant decline in symptomatic distress and a significant increase in self-esteem, and felt more hopeful about their problems, both immediately following the feedback session and at a 2-week follow-up. Also, clients' subjective impressions of the feedback session were overwhelmingly positive. Although the study failed to identify specific client variables or elements of the feedback session that were related to these changes, the findings indicate that psychological assessment can be used as a therapeutic intervention.Preliminary findings from this study were presented at the 25th Annual Symposium on Recent Developments in the Use of the MMPI (MMPI-2), June 23,1990, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The research was conducted in partial fulfillment of Mary Tonsager's MA degree requirements, under the supervision of Stephen E. Finn.We thank the staff of the University of Texas at Austin's Counseling and Mental Health Center, especially the intake workers-Barbara Burnham, Vic Burnstein, Linda Ridge, and Alex Shafer-for their help in recruiting clients to the study. We also thank the director and staff of the Learning Abilities Center at the University of Texas at Austin for the use of their training facilities to conduct all the interviews and feedback sessions. Additional thanks go to Arnold H. Buss, William B. Swann, and Lee Willerman for their critical comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Therapeutic Assessment is a semi-structured form of collaborative psychological assessment that grew out of efforts to make psychological assessment a positive and beneficial experience for clients. Although we developed this approach without being highly informed about humanistic psychology, gradually our work with clients led us toward more humanistic techniques and principles. We describe some of these techniques and their relationship to the efficacy of Therapeutic Assessment. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.