Study Objective. To determine the effect of oxandrolone administration on nutritional and clinical outcomes after multiple trauma. Design. Prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Setting. Level 1 trauma center in a university teaching hospital. Patients. Sixty‐two patients requiring enteral nutrition, 60 of whom completed the study. Intervention. Patients were randomized to receive either oxandrolone 10 mg or placebo twice/day for a maximum of 28 days. Measurements and Main Results. Total urinary nitrogen, prealbumin, nitrogen balance, total body water, and body cell mass were measured on day 1 of enteral nutrition and then at day 7, day 10, and study exit. Patients were assessed daily for metabolic and infectious complications. The two groups were similar for demographics and dosage of enteral nutrition. Measurement of total urinary nitrogen at study entry showed both groups to be highly catabolic (oxandrolone 17.2 ± 4.9, placebo 19.1 ± 10.8 g/day, NS). On days 7 and 10, total urinary nitrogen increased in both groups; however, there was no significant difference between groups. Nitrogen balance was negative throughout the study in each group. Body cell mass decreased slightly in both groups over the study period. Prealbumin serum concentrations increased significantly in both groups at day 10 and study exit compared with study entry. The groups did not differ significantly for length of hospital stay (oxandrolone 30.8 ± 17.9, placebo 27.0 ± 25.7 days), length of intensive care unit stay (oxandrolone 17.1 ± 7.8, placebo 15.5 ± 9.7 days), and frequency of pneumonia or sepsis (oxandrolone 48, placebo 43 episodes). Conclusion. Oxandrolone 20 mg/day does not have obvious benefit in nutritional and clinical outcomes during the first month after multiple trauma.
Purpose: The most recent published guidelines on Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD) developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were released in 2017 and outline its treatment based on severity of the disease and recurrence; however, a clear first-line agent has not been recommended specifically for severe CDAD. Methods: This retrospective chart review was approved by the institutional review board and consisted of three community hospitals and one academic medical center. To be included, patients need to meet criteria for severe CDAD and receive at least 72 hours of therapy. Patients received either oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin, in addition to other therapies for CDAD, and differences in outcomes such as cost obtained from a common charge center, rates of recurrence, time to recurrence as measured at time of positive to negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and mortality were assessed. Results: Of the 147 patients, 74 patients received fidaxomicin and 73 patients received oral vancomycin. The average hospitalization cost for patients receiving fidaxomicin was $129,338.69 and for patients receiving vancomycin was $153,563.81 ( P = .26). Recurrence rates were lower with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin (6.8% vs 17.6%; P = .047), and time to recurrence was longer with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but not statistically significant (96.8 ± 45.9 days vs 63.2 ± 66.9 days; P = .321). Mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall length of stay were similar between the two therapies. Conclusions: In the treatment of severe CDAD, recurrence rates were lower and time to recurrence was higher with fidaxomicin compared with oral vancomycin. A clear financial benefit has yet to translate from these known findings.
The MSCCP Task Force on Anticoagulation project was successful in promoting collaboration among multiple institutions and clinical practitioners to offer solutions to meet NPSG.03.05.01 as it related to the needs of each institution.
In our limited sample size, doripenem was safe and effective against various types of infections in a general inpatient population with similar bacterial susceptibilities to other cabapenems. Doripenem was utilized for appropriate indications, but doses were frequently outside the manufacturers labeling. Adverse events were uncommon, and no serious adverse events were directly associated with doripenem treatment.
BackgroundErythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. However, misappropriate and over-use of these agents can be costly and unnecessary in some settings.ObjectiveThe primary aim was to identify predictors of adherence to a newly approved ESA inpatient ordering policy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the impact of a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy on ESA usage, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and costs.MethodsThis retrospective observational record review included a sample of adult patients admitted to four tertiary care hospitals from November 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to calculate the odds of adherence to the new ESA inpatient ordering policy and the impact of this policy on discharge Hb level, respectively.ResultsA total of 242 patients were included. The majority of the prescribers (77%) adhered to the new ESA ordering policy. Hemoglobin (OR = 1.306; 95% CI: 1.03–1.65) and ferritin (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 1.23–12.51) levels at admission and length of hospital stay were positively correlated with the odds of patients receiving ESAs after day 5 (OR = 1.12; 95% CI:1.05–1.20). Furthermore, adherence to the new policy did not have a significant impact on discharge Hb level (β = 0.02349; P = 0.895).ConclusionsPrescribers were adherent to a 5-day delay in the initiation of ESA therapy policy which resulted in a reduction in ESA usage, did not impact the discharge Hb levels, and was proven to be cost effective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.