Introduction Uterus transplantation has shown success in treating women with uterine factor infertility who want to carry their own pregnancy. Methods We report the medical, sexual, and psychological outcomes of our first cohort of 13 living donor hysterectomies. As we have transitioned from open to robotically assisted hysterectomy, this report represents the complete series of open donor hysterectomies at our center, all with ≥6‐month postoperative outcomes. Results The open donor hysterectomy had a median of a 6.5‐hour surgical time, 0.8 L estimated blood loss, 6‐day hospital stay, and 28‐day sick leave. Three donors had a grade III or IV complications, one reported new‐onset psychological symptoms, and 9 experienced transient sexual discomfort. All complications were addressed and resolved, and all donors returned to their presurgical social and physical activities. Conclusion Since uterus transplantation is not life‐saving or life‐extending, the risks in living uterus donation must be weighed against the benefit of giving another woman the opportunity to give birth to her own child. This report provides data to support more detailed informed consent regarding the medical, psychological, and sexual complications of open living donor hysterectomy and allows for further evaluation of the ethical acceptability of this procedure.

In the seventeenth century, Guarino Guarini, mathematician and architect, affirmed that architecture, a discipline that primarily deals with measures, relies on geometry: therefore, the architect needs to know at least its basic principles. On behalf of Guarini’s words, we designed a set of interdisciplinary teaching experiences, between mathematics (via a calculus course) and drawing (via our Architectural Drawing and Survey Laboratory courses) that we proposed to first-year under graduate students studying for an Architecture degree. The tasks concern mathematical and representational issues about vaulted roofing systems and are based on the use of physical models in conjunction with digital tools, in order to make the cognitive geometric process more effective, thus following a consolidated tradition of both disciplines.

This contribution arises from the interest (on the themes of semiotics and communication of architecture, even in its deep meanings) derived from studies and comparisons with Renato De Fusco, Maria Luisa Scalvini, Pio Luigi Brusasco, Pier Tosoni, Alberto Borghini. A question has been confirmed: what can be the meanings of architecture, especially in the visual field? What are its own contents, and what are "other" contents? Around this subject a research team with scholars of the Politecnico di Torino (called "Alpha Group") was constituted; which has now resumed in a convergent manner to investigate and experiment semiotic in architecture; paying attention to languages of vision. The approach of the chosen method is inspired (in a comparative experiment) to the Nouvelle Rhétorique, the Groupe μ of Liège (with Greimas, Hielmslev, Perelman) internationally known for the definition of an applied rhetoric model-a classic of the human sciences-dedicated to interdisciplinary research, which crosses the aesthetic approach with semiotics, theory of linguistics and visual communication. The first conclusion tends to reinforce the in-depth analysis of the method, and the enhancement of interdisciplinary comparisons, first of all the one with semiotic.

No abstract

No abstract