The objective of this study was to assess the effect of different options of soil preparation and management of harvesting debris on biodiversity and biomass of understory vegetation in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus of Central Portugal. The experiment consisted of six treatments in a replanted area and four treatments in a coppice area with five replicates, following a randomised block design. Surveys of vegetation were performed for 6 years. The proportion of soil cover by plant species was estimated and the Shannon-Wiener diversity and equitability indexes determined for each treatment and year. After the 2nd year, the understory vegetation was randomly sampled for above-ground biomass determination. Within the planted area, the removal of slash without soil preparation induced the highest number of species during the experimental period. A similar trend was observed in the coppice area, but less regularly. Significant differences in the proportion of soil cover only occurred within the planted area in the first year, when slash removal without soil preparation induced the highest understory cover. Species diversity was not clearly affected by treatments: significant differences only occurred occasionally and were apparently related to differences in the number of species. Therefore, differences in the equitability index between treatments never were significant. Removal of slash without soil disturbance and broadcast of slash over the soil usually shared the highest biodiversity. Differences between treatments in the amount of understory biomass were never statistically significant during the experimental period. Tendency for a negative influence of soil mobilisation on the amount of understory biomass was observed within the planted area, as well as a similar effect of the treatments consisting of broadcast of slash over the soil surface in the coppice area. In parallel to tree development and canopy closure biomass of that vegetation along the study period was reduced, especially in the planted area.

Harrowing and fertilisation are common practices at middle rotation in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantations in Central Portugal. In order to clarify the effects of such practices on understory vegetation and timber production, a field trial was installed in a 5-year-old first rotation eucalyptus plantation, in a region with mixed oceanic and Mediterranean climatic influences. Four treatments that involved harrowing (H), fertilisation (F), harrowing and fertilisation (HF), and control (C) were tested in the study. The treatments were replicated four times and arranged in a simple completely randomised design. Vegetation surveys were performed by the quadrat method in the 3 years following treatments and by the line interception method in the 7th and 8th years. Samples of understory biomass were collected, oven dried and weighed. In treatments with harrowing, the understory vegetation consistently had lower number of species, less plant cover, species diversity, and biomass than the other treatments. The mean total number of species only once reached 10 in H or HF plots, and was always greater than 12 in C and F plots in the first 3 years, but decreased in the 7th and 8th years. In the first 3 years, the understory biomass averaged 30-60 g m À2 in the F and C plots, and never exceeded 13 g m À2 in treatments with harrowing, which corresponded with the proportion of soil coverage by understory vegetation (4-12% in H and HF, and 38-62% in F and C plots). In the 7th and 8th years, differences in the understory biomass were less important, but the control plots consistently had the largest understory biomass. The influence of treatments in timber production was not statistically significant at the end of rotation. #

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different slash management practices on understory biodiversity and biomass in Eucalyptus globulus coppices in Central Portugal. The experiment consisted of four treatments: (a) removal of slash (R), (b) broadcast over the soil (S), (c) as in S but concentrating woody residues between tree rows (W) and (d) incorporation of slash into soil by harrowing (I). Understory vegetation was surveyed during 1-6, 9, and 10 years, the proportion of soil cover by plant species estimated, and diversity and equitability indexes determined. Above ground understory biomass was sampled in years 2-6, 9, and 10. The highest number of species in most years occurred in plots where slash was removed. Differences between treatments in the proportion of plant soil cover were never significant, whereas differences in diversity index were only occasionally significant and apparently related to the number of species. Thus, differences in the equitability index were not significant. Understory biomass did not decrease during the rotation period, and was usually highest in R and I, and lowest in S, but not significantly different. At the end of the rotation period, understory biodiversity indices and biomass were apparently independent of slash treatment.

<p>Recently burnt areas have frequently been documented to produce strong to extreme catchment-scale hydrological and erosion responses to major rainfall events, even if these responses have rarely been quantified. These responses have raised important concerns, both among forest owners and managers on the on-site implications of soil (fertility) loss and among water resources managers for the off-side impacts on downstream values-at-risk such as road and hydraulic infrastructures, flood zones, and surface water quality in reservoirs or at river intake points. State-of-the-art emergency stabilization management, as practiced in the USA and Galicia, aims at reducing the hydrological and erosion response at its main source, i.e. the hillslopes. Based on years and decades of experience and pain-staking field monitoring in both the USA and Galicia, mulching is typically preferred over barrier-based methods, especially for being more effective in the case of high-intensity rainfall storms. Even so, the LIFE-REFOREST consortium (LIFE17 ENV/ES/000248) has developed an innovative barrier-based technique that is designed to be implemented easier and faster than log and shrub barriers and, at the same time, to improve vegetation recovery, using seeds of plant species that establish vegetation strips against runoff and erosion and/or seeds of tree and shrub species for re- or afforestation. The REFOREST barriers consists of geotubes containing, besides seeds, a mycotechnosoil as well as straw. The effectiveness of the LIFE-REFOREST geotubes is current being tested under field conditions in summer-2019 burnt areas in north-central Portugal and Galicia, in contrasting forest types (eucalypt vs. pine) on contrasting parent materials (schist vs. granite). Both field trials involve, besides 3 control plots and 3 plots with geotubes, also 3 plots mulched with either eucalypt logging residues or pine needles. The present poster will show preliminary results of the field trial in north-central Portugal, in a second-rotation eucalypt stand where tree crowns were scorched by the fire and soil burn severity was classified as moderate. These results concern the initial monitoring period till early spring 2020. However, this monitoring period has been quite rainy so far, arguably providing rather ideal conditions for testing the effectiveness of barrier-based solutions such as that of LIFE-REFOREST.</p>

<p>Scars left by wildfires are easily noticeable in the Mediterranean landscape, turning these events a major issue for forest management. Like any wound, even those left by fires must be treated to properly regenerate.</p><p>In a burned area the vegetation cover is often destroyed by the fire, leaving the soil unprotected and vulnerable to erosion. The alterations of soil properties induced by fires lead to an increase in surface runoff, promoting the detachment of sediments and consequently endangering the water quality of downstream aquatic systems. If left unmanaged, the spontaneous regeneration of vegetation will eventually cover the affected area, restoring its natural hydrological cycle. After a wildfire, in Portugal, following an economical based perspective, the burned areas are normally reforested with selected plants species, namely Eucalypt and Maritime Pine, not infrequently by resorting to the implementation of bench terraces.</p><p>To define the best management strategy to adopt after a fire, the scientific community is continuously assessing the effects of these forestry practices on soils and the downstream water bodies. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to simulate three different post-fire land management scenarios for a small catchment (21.9 ha) in central Portugal. The choice of this basin relates to the implementation of terraces to create a eucalyptus forest production area, 6 months after a fire burned the catchment completely. The model was calibrated for streamflow and water quality at the catchment outlet, both for the short post-fire period and the following eucalyptus cycle. In this study two post-fire scenarios were created, one with the recovery of the vegetation, and another in which a highly effective erosion mitigation measure (mulching) was applied to the high and moderate fire severity burned areas. The third scenario corresponded to the implementation of the terraces and the actual eucalyptus cycle.</p><p>Both the mulch application and the eucalyptus cycle scenario showed an important reduction in soil loss and sediment transport when compared with the post-fire spontaneous recovery scenario. A smaller reduction in the total runoff, as well as a negligible change in total flow, was found in the mulching scenario when compared with the spontaneous recovery one. Despite the eucalyptus cycle presented the highest flow discharge for the overall period, it presents smaller discharge peaks when compared with the two post-fire management scenarios.</p>

<p>Wildfires constitute a diffuse source of contamination to aquatic ecosystems. In burnt areas, the increase in surface runoff and associated sediment losses after fire, promotes the mobilization of hazardous substances, such as metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), posing a risk for the adjacent water bodies. In the present study, post-fire metals and PAHs export by surface runoff was evaluated in 16 m<sup>2 </sup>bounded plots in a eucalypt stand in Albergaria-a-Velha (Aveiro district, North-Central Portugal) burnt in September 2019. Runoff samples were collected on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, depending on the occurrence of rainfall, during the first 6 months after fire. The metals analyzed in this study were, vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb). As for PAHs, the analyses focused on the 16 compounds classified as priority pollutants by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Both dissolved and particulate fractions of metals and PAHs in runoff waters were analysed in this work. Preliminary results suggest that metals are more likely to affect the water quality of fire-affected water bodies than PAHs, since low levels of PAHs were found in runoff waters. This work provides valuable information for water managers to minimize the risks of wildfires both to the environment and to public health.</p>

<p>Wildfires constitute a diffuse source of contamination to aquatic ecosystems. In burnt hillslopes, ash and sediments transported by overland flow are a source of potentially hazardous substances, like metals, posing a risk for downstream water bodies. In the present study, post-fire metal mobilization by overland flow was evaluated in 16 m<sup>2 </sup>bounded plots at a eucalypt stand in Albergaria-a-Velha (Aveiro district, North-Central Portugal) that burnt with moderate severity in September 2019. Overland flow samples were collected on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, depending on the occurrence of rain, during the first 6 months after fire. Aside from overland flow samples collected at slope scale, water and sediment samples were also collected in a fire-affected stream within the Albergaria burned catchment, to assess the contamination risk posed by the fire. Samples were collected at three sites along the stream: one upstream, one within and another downstream from the burnt area, after major rainfall events. The metals analysed in this study included, vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb). Results showed that most metals exhibited a peak in exports immediately after the first significant post-fire rainfall event likely due to the wash-off of the ash layer and high sediment losses, but for some elements like Zn and Cu, exports were more or less constant over time. The fire seems to have had a low impact on the water quality of the affected stream, since metal concentrations were similar between the three study sites. The quality of stream sediments, on the other hand, was clearly affected by the fire, especially after the rainy season. As fire severity and frequency is forecasted to increase in the near future due to climate changes, the results of this work reinforce the importance of water managers to define adaptative strategies to effectively protect freshwater bodies.</p>

<p>Recently burnt areas across the world have been documented to produce strong to extreme erosion responses but these responses are much better quantified for (micro-)plots and planar hillslopes than for convergent hillslopes and catchments. The same applies, mutatis mutandis, for the effectiveness of so-called emergency stabilization measures to reduce the risks of such strong to extreme responses. The only prior study in Portugal on the mitigation of post-fire erosion beyond the planar slope scale (i.e. swales of 500-800 m2) tested mulching with eucalypt logging residues. It found the treatment to be highly effective during the first two post-fire hydrological years in the sense that soil losses were, average, 88 and 77% smaller at the three mulched swales than at the 3 untreated swales. This in spite the mulch had been applied at reduced rate (2.4 Mg ha-1) compared to preceding, plot-scale studies in the region (>8 Mg ha-1). Against this background, the present study decided to test the effectiveness of log barriers to reduce post-fire erosion beyond the planar slope scale, in particular to provide evidence supporting the post-fire land management strategy that is being developed by the INTERREG-SUDOE project EPyRIS (SOE2/P5/E0811). The study area is located in the Aveiro District of central Portugal and burnt during early  September 2020. In the part of the burnt area that is being managed by the Portuguese Nature Conservation and Forests Institute (ICNF), three pairs of neighbouring micro-catchments of 0.3-0.8 ha and, in one exceptional case (due to run-on from a forest track), 2.7 ha were instrumented with sediment fences at their outlets before the occurrence of the first significant rainfall event after the wildfire. The barriers, however, could not be installed until after the subtropical storm ALPHA that hit continental Portugal on 18-19 September, also due to some delay in the contracting of a company that would have prior experience in implementing post-fire emergency stabilization measures. The sediment yields produced by this first post-fire rainfall event were used to select which of each pair of micro-catchments to be treated, i.e. the one producing most erosion. Furthermore, the initial sediment yields of the three to-be-treated micro-catchments were used to decide the number of barriers per catchment, ranging from one to three. Both these aspects of the experimental design imply that the quantification of (cost-)effectiveness will less straightforward than in case of a randomized design. In compensation, the upslope part of each barrier was covered with geotextile immediately after construction to estimate the barrier’s capacity to induce sediment deposition and, at the scale of the entire micro-catchment, its effectiveness to reduce post-fire sediment yields, even if sediment deposition will only be measured at the end of each hydrological. This envisaged poster will present the differences in sediment yields between the paired, treated and untreated micro-catchments during the first post-fire autumn-winter period, and discuss them in function of terrain characteristics of the micro-catchments, RS-based fire severity, rainfall regime and changes in surface cover as derived from RGB imagery acquired with a low-cost drone.</p>