No abstract

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P ‫؍‬ 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.

Background— Atherosclerosis is complicated by cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Inflammation and pathological neovascularization are thought to precipitate plaque rupture or erosion, both causes of arterial thrombosis and cardiovascular events. We tested the hypothesis that arterial inflammation and angiogenic events are increased throughout the arterial tree in vulnerable patients, ie, in patients who suffered from cardiovascular events, compared with patients who never suffered from complications of atherosclerosis. Methods and Results— In a postmortem study, we quantified the inflammatory infiltrate and microvascular network in the arterial wall of iliac, carotid, and renal arteries. Tissue microarray technology was adapted to investigate full-thickness arterial sectors. We compared 22 patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis with 27 patients who never had suffered from any cardiovascular event. The absolute intimal macrophage content was 2- to 4-fold higher in vulnerable patients at all 3 arterial sites analyzed ( P <0.05). Patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis had a denser network of vasa vasorum than patients with asymptomatic disease (33±2 versus 25±2 adventitial microvessels per 1 mm 2 ; P =0.008). Hyperplasia of vasa vasorum was an early and macrophage infiltration was a late sign of symptomatic atherosclerosis. Conclusions— High intimal macrophage content and a hyperplastic network of vasa vasorum characterize vulnerable patients suffering from symptomatic atherosclerosis. These changes are uniformly present in different arterial beds and support the concept of symptomatic atherosclerosis as a panarterial disease.

Purpose: To critically assess the accuracy and reproducibility of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER-2) testing in outside/local community-based hospitals versus two centralized reference laboratories and its effect on selection of women for trastuzumab (Herceptin)b ased clinical trials. Experimental Design: Breast cancer specimens from 2,600 women were prospectively evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for entry into Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) clinical trials for HER-2-directed therapies. Results: HER-2 gene amplification by FISH was observed in 657 of the 2,502 (26%) breast cancers successfully analyzed. Among 2,243 breast cancers with central laboratory immunohistochemistry (10H8-IHC) analysis, 504 (22.54%) showed overexpression (2+ or 3+). Outside/ local laboratories assessed HER-2 status by immunohistochemistry in 1,536 of these cases and by FISH in 131cases. Overall, the HER-2 alteration status determined by outside/local immunohistochemistry showed a 79% agreement rate [j statistic, 0.56; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.52-0.60], with FISH done by the central laboratories. The agreement rate comparing BCIRG central laboratory 10H8-IHC and outside/local laboratory immunohistochemistry was 77.5% (j statistic, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.55). Finally, HER-2 status, determined by unspecified FISH assay methods at outside/local laboratories, showed a 92% agreement rate (j statistic, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93), with FISH done at the BCIRG central laboratories. Conclusions: Compared with the HER-2 status determined at centralized BCIRG reference laboratories, these results indicate superiority of FISH to accurately and reproducibly assess tumors for the HER-2 alteration at outside/local laboratories for entry to clinical trials.