No abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate associations between a high genetic disease risk and disease severity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsPatients with SLE (n=1001, discovery cohort and n=5524, replication cohort) and healthy controls (n=2802 and n=9859) were genotyped using a 200K Immunochip single nucleotide polymorphism array. A genetic risk score (GRS) was assigned to each individual based on 57 SLE risk loci.ResultsSLE was more prevalent in the high, compared with the low, GRS-quartile (OR 12.32 (9.53 to 15.71), p=7.9×10–86 and OR 7.48 (6.73 to 8.32), p=2.2×10–304 for the discovery and the replication cohorts, respectively). In the discovery cohort, patients in the high GRS-quartile had a 6-year earlier mean disease onset (HR 1.47 (1.22 to 1.75), p=4.3×10–5), displayed higher prevalence of damage accrual (OR 1.47 (1.06 to 2.04), p=2.0×10–2), renal disorder (OR 2.22 (1.50 to 3.27), p=5.9×10–5), anti-dsDNA (OR 1.83 (1.19 to 2.81), p=6.1×10–3), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (OR 5.58 (1.50 to 20.79), p=1.0×10–2), proliferative nephritis (OR 2.42 (1.30 to 4.49), p=5.1×10–3), anti-cardiolipin-IgG (OR 1.89 (1.13 to 3.18), p=1.6×10–2), anti-β2-glycoprotein-I-IgG (OR 2.29 (1.29 to 4.06), p=4.8×10–3) and positive lupus anticoagulant test (OR 2.12 (1.16 to 3.89), p=1.5×10–2) compared with patients in the low GRS-quartile. Survival analysis showed earlier onset of the first organ damage (HR 1.51 (1.04 to 2.25), p=3.7×10–2), first cardiovascular event (HR 1.65 (1.03 to 2.64), p=2.6×10–2), nephritis (HR 2.53 (1.72 to 3.71), p=9.6×10–7), ESRD (HR 6.78 (1.78 to 26.86), p=6.5×10–3) and decreased overall survival (HR 1.83 (1.02 to 3.30), p=4.3×10–2) in high to low quartile comparison.ConclusionsA high GRS is associated with increased risk of organ damage, renal dysfunction and all-cause mortality. Our results indicate that genetic profiling may be useful for predicting outcomes in patients with SLE.

ObjectiveAntinuclear antibody (ANA) analysis by immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy remains a diagnostic hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The clinical relevance of ANA fine-specificities in SLE has been addressed repeatedly, whereas studies on IF-ANA staining patterns in relation to disease manifestations are very scarce. This study was performed to elucidate whether different staining patterns associate with distinct SLE phenotypes.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingOne university hospital rheumatology unit in Sweden.ParticipantsThe study population consisted of 222 cases (89% women; 93% Caucasians), where of 178 met ≥4/11 of the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR-82) criteria. The remaining 20% had an SLE diagnosis based on positive IF-ANA (HEp-2 cells) and ≥2 typical organ manifestations at the time of diagnosis (Fries’ criteria).Outcome measuresThe IF-ANA staining patterns homogenous (H-ANA), speckled (S-ANA), combined homogenous and speckled (HS-ANA), centromeric (C-ANA), nucleolar (N-ANA)±other patterns and other nuclear patterns (oANA) were related to disease manifestations and laboratory measures. Antigen-specificities were also considered regarding double-stranded DNA (Crithidia luciliae) and the following extractable nuclear antigens: Ro/SSA, La/SSB, Smith antigen (Sm), small nuclear RNP (snRNP), Scl-70 and Jo-1 (immunodiffusion and/or line-blot technique).Results54% of the patients with SLE displayed H-ANA, 22% S-ANA, 11% HS-ANA, 9% N-ANA, 1% C-ANA, 2% oANA and 1% were never IF-ANA positive. Staining patterns among patients meeting Fries’ criteria alone did not differ from those fulfilling ACR-82. H-ANA was significantly associated with the 10th criterion according to ACR-82 (‘immunological disorder’). S-ANA was inversely associated with arthritis, ‘immunological disorder’ and signs of organ damage.ConclusionsH-ANA is the dominant IF-ANA pattern among Swedish patients with SLE, and was found to associate with ‘immunological disorder’ according to ACR-82. The second most common pattern, S-ANA, associated negatively with arthritis and organ damage.

Summary Serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G anti‐nuclear antibodies (ANA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy remains a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Whether or not IF‐ANA status varies over time is controversial. We therefore designed a prospective study with longitudinal follow‐up of patients with recent‐onset SLE. The study population consisted of 54 recently diagnosed SLE cases, all meeting the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and/or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria. Clinical follow‐up data, including disease activity, organ damage and sera, were collected from clinical onset of SLE and onwards, in most cases yearly (0‒96 months). IF‐ANA was analysed on human epithelial cells‐2 (HEp‐2) cells and categorized regarding staining patterns. Using an addressable laser bead assay (FIDIS™ Connective profile), we measured IgG‐ANA fine specificities against Ro52/SSA, Ro60/SSA, Sjögren’s syndrome type B antigen (La/SSB), Smith antigen (Sm), Smith antigen/ribonucleoprotein (Sm/RNP), U1 RNP (U1RNP), dsDNA, ribosomal‐P protein and histone. At baseline, all patients were judged ANA‐positive at an abnormal titre corresponding to the 95th percentile of healthy blood donors, but seven of 54 patients (13%) lost ANA‐positivity over time. Homogeneous (AC‐1; 46%) and speckled (AC‐4 or 5; 31%) were the most frequently observed patterns at inclusion, whereas 7% switched pattern at least once during follow‐up. Established associations between ANA fine specificities and clinical data were confirmed. Levels of anti‐Sm/RNP, but not of anti‐dsDNA, correlated with clinical disease activity [modified SLE disease activity 2000 (mSLEDAI‐2K)]. Our data indicate that a considerable proportion of Swedish patients with SLE lose ANA‐positivity over time, whereas consistent staining patterns were frequent. The clinical and mechanistic relevance of ANA seroconversion remains uncertain. Further prospective evaluations in larger SLE populations with more diverse ethnicities are warranted.

We observed a negative impact of smoking on the efficacy of belimumab in mucocutaneous SLE. In contrast, no impact of smoking on belimumab efficacy was seen in patients with articular manifestations.