Waldian t tests: Sequential Bayesian t tests with controlled error probabilities [Manuscript submitted for publication].

Kinnell and Dennis (2012) showed that the list length effect in recognition memory is only observed for homogeneous stimulus material. On the basis of the global matching model MINERVA 2 (Hintzman, 1986, 1988), we offer a theoretical explanation for this finding. According to our analysis, homogeneous material immunizes against the disruptive influence of preexperimental items, which might mask the intralist interference predicted by global matching models for familiar heterogeneous material. We tested our approach in three experiments. In Experiment 1, we found list length effects for homogeneous photographs of flowers and landscapes. In Experiment 2 and 3, we presented heterogeneous photographs of scenes (Experiment 2) and faces (Experiment 3). List length effects were only found if these photographs were homogenized by the use of image-processing filters. We further show that our explanation is also in line with the results of Dennis and Chapman (2010) who found an inverse list length effect. Overall, our results provide evidence for a global matching account of familiarity. (PsycINFO Database Record

ANOVA—the workhorse of experimental psychology—seems well understood in that behavioral sciences have agreed-upon contrasts and reporting conventions. Yet, we argue this consensus hides considerable flaws in common ANOVA procedures, and these flaws become especially salient in the within-subject and mixed-model cases. The main thesis is that these flaws are in model specification. The specifications underlying common use are deficient from a substantive perspective, that is, they do not match reality in behavioral experiments. The problem, in particular, is that specifications rely on coincidental rather than robust statements about reality. We provide specifications that avoid making arguments based on coincidences, and note these Bayes factor model comparisons among these specifications are already convenient in the BayesFactor package. Finally, we argue that model specification necessarily and critically reflects substantive concerns, and, consequently, is ultimately the responsibility of substantive researchers. Source code for this project is at github/PerceptionAndCognitionLab/stat_aov2.

Our understanding of the mechanisms underlying social conformity has recently advanced due to the employment of neuroscience methodology and novel experimental approaches. Most prominently, several studies have demonstrated the role of neural reinforcement-learning processes in conformal adjustments using a specifically designed and frequently replicated paradigm. Only very recently, the validity of the critical behavioral effect in this very paradigm was seriously questioned, as it invites the unwanted contribution of regression toward the mean. Using a straightforward control-group design, we corroborate this recent finding and demonstrate the involvement of statistical distortions. Additionally, however, we provide conclusive evidence that the paradigm nevertheless captures behavioral effects that can only be attributed to social influence. Finally, we present a mathematical approach that allows to isolate and quantify the paradigm’s true conformity effect both at the group level and for each individual participant. These data as well as relevant theoretical considerations suggest that the groundbreaking findings regarding the brain mechanisms of social conformity that were obtained with this recently criticized paradigm were indeed valid. Moreover, we support earlier suggestions that distorted behavioral effects can be rectified by means of appropriate correction procedures.

Objective To determine predictors of focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS) during video–electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (VEM). Methods All adult patients undergoing presurgical VEM from 2014 to 2015 in the department of epileptology were eligible (N = 229). Those with refractory focal epilepsy and epileptic seizures recorded during VEM were analyzed (N = 188, Group 1). To assess the effects of antiepileptic drug (AED) taper, the total AED load was calculated as the sum of the ratios of prescribed daily dose and defined daily dose of all AEDs per VEM day and was correlated with the occurrence of focal seizures without bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FwoBTCS) and FBTCS. To validate the findings, data of patients undergoing VEM in 2004 and 2005 (Group 2, eligible N = 243, analyzed N = 203) were also investigated. Results In Group 1, 53 patients had FBTCS and 135 patients had exclusively FwoBTCS during VEM. Reduced AED load at seizure onset was the most important modifiable risk factor for FBTCS (receiver‐operating characteristic [ROC]: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.78). Furthermore, the risk of FBTCS varied with the history and frequency of FBTCS prior to VEM. For instance, patients had a 50% risk of FBTCS by reducing the AED load to ~20% when no information about history of FBTCS was taken into account, to ~30% when a positive history of FBTCS was taken into account, and to ~50% when a high frequency of FBTCS prior to VEM was taken into account. These findings were largely replicated in Group 2 (59 patients with FBTCS and 144 exclusively with FwoBTCS). Significance The risk of FTBCS during VEM depends on the history and frequency of FTBCS prior to VEM and is particularly associated with the extent of AED reduction. Our data underscore the need for appropriate tapering regimens in VEM units.