SummaryIn most organisms, dedicated multiprotein complexes, called exosome or RNA degradosome, carry out RNA degradation and processing. In addition to varying exoribonucleases or endoribonucleases, most of these complexes contain a RNA helicase. In the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, a RNA degradosome has recently been described; however, no RNA helicase was identified. In this work, we tested the interaction of the four DEAD box RNA helicases encoded in the B. subtilis genome with the RNA degradosome components. One of these helicases, CshA, is able to interact with several of the degradosome proteins, i.e. RNase Y, the polynucleotide phosphorylase, and the glycolytic enzymes enolase and phosphofructokinase. The determination of in vivo protein-protein interactions revealed that CshA is indeed present in a complex with polynucleotide phosphorylase. CshA is composed of two RecA-like domains that are found in all DEAD box RNA helicases and a C-terminal domain that is present in some members of this protein family. An analysis of the contribution of the individual domains of CshA revealed that the C-terminal domain is crucial both for dimerization of CshA and for all interactions with components of the RNA degradosome, including RNase Y. A transfer of this domain to CshB allowed the resulting chimeric protein to interact with RNase Y suggesting that this domain confers interaction specificity. As a degradosome component, CshA is present in the cell in similar amounts under all conditions. Taken together, our results suggest that CshA is the functional equivalent of the RhlB helicase of the Escherichia coli RNA degradosome.

Glycolysis is one of the most important metabolic pathways in heterotrophic organisms. Several genes encoding glycolytic enzymes are essential in many bacteria even under conditions when neither glycolytic nor gluconeogenic activities are required. In this study, a screening for in vivo interaction partners of glycolytic enzymes of the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis was used to provide a rationale for essentiality of glycolytic enzymes. Glycolytic enzymes proved to be in close contact with several other proteins, among them a high proportion of essential proteins. Among these essential interaction partners, other glycolytic enzymes were most prominent. Two-hybrid studies confirmed interactions of phosphofructokinase with phosphoglyceromutase and enolase. Such a complex of glycolytic enzymes might allow direct substrate channeling of glycolytic intermediates. Moreover we found associations of glycolytic enzymes with several proteins known or suspected to be involved in RNA processing and degradation. One of these proteins, Rny (YmdA), which has so far not been functionally characterized, is required for the processing of the mRNA of the glycolytic gapA operon. Two-hybrid analyses confirmed the interactions between the glycolytic enzymes phosphofructokinase and enolase and the enzymes involved in RNA processing, RNase J1, Rny, and polynucleotide phosphorylase. Moreover RNase J1 interacts with its homologue RNase J2. We suggest that this complex of mRNA processing and glycolytic enzymes is the B. subtilis equivalent of the RNA degradosome. Our findings suggest that the functional interaction of glycolytic enzymes with essential proteins may be the reason why they are indispensable. Glycolysis is a central metabolic pathway that appeared early in the evolution of life (1). Major functions of the glycolytic pathway are the generation of precursors for anabolic reactions and the conservation of energy that is needed to fuel all other cellular processes. The glycolytic pathway is conventionally divided into two parts: (i) the upper part, also referred to as the preparatory phase of glycolysis because the reactions of this part consume energy to convert the incoming sugars to triose phosphates, and (ii), the lower part or payoff phase that is characterized by the net gain of energy and the formation of reduction equivalents. Although glycolysis is highly conserved from archaea and bacteria to man not all organisms use this pathway for the oxidization of glucose. Escherichia coli is able to oxidize glucose via glycolysis, but the Entner-Doudoroff and the pentose phosphate pathways may replace the preparatory phase. In contrast to E. coli, the Entner-Doudoroff pathway is not present in Bacillus subtilis (2). Interestingly the enzymes of the upper glycolytic part seem to be completely absent in many archaea (3, 4). These few examples show that there is a high plasticity in how archaea and bacteria can feed glucose into the triose phosphate part of glycolysis. This plasticity is in good agreement with the observation that...

The control of mRNA stability is an important component of regulation in bacteria. Processing and degradation of mRNAs are initiated by an endonucleolytic attack, and the cleavage products are processively degraded by exoribonucleases. In many bacteria, these RNases, as well as RNA helicases and other proteins, are organized in a protein complex called the RNA degradosome. In Escherichia coli, the RNA degradosome is assembled around the essential endoribonuclease E. In Bacillus subtilis, the recently discovered essential endoribonuclease RNase Y is involved in the initiation of RNA degradation. Moreover, RNase Y interacts with other RNases, the RNA helicase CshA, and the glycolytic enzymes enolase and phosphofructokinase in a degradosome-like complex. In this work, we have studied the domain organization of RNase Y and the contribution of the domains to protein-protein interactions. We provide evidence for the physical interaction between RNase Y and the degradosome partners in vivo. We present experimental and bioinformatic data which indicate that the RNase Y contains significant regions of intrinsic disorder and discuss the possible functional implications of this finding. The localization of RNase Y in the membrane is essential both for the viability of B. subtilis and for all interactions that involve RNase Y. The results presented in this study provide novel evidence for the idea that RNase Y is the functional equivalent of RNase E, even though the two enzymes do not share any sequence similarity. mRNAs transmit the genetic information from DNA to proteins. In contrast to the high stability of tRNA and rRNA, bacterial mRNAs are readily degraded. This crucial feature ensures the ability of bacteria to respond quickly to changing environmental conditions by adding an extra layer of control, in addition to the regulation of transcription and enzymatic activities of proteins (1). Moreover, mRNA processing allows the adjustment of different expression levels for genes encoded in one operon, as observed for the ilv operon and the glycolytic gapA operon of the Gram-positive soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (24,40,45).The enzymes that process and degrade RNAs are called RNases. In the two model organisms Escherichia coli and B. subtilis, a set of about 20 RNases has been described thus far, but only a small fraction of these are common to both bacteria (12). Some of these RNases (e.g., RNase M5 or RNase-Mini III in B. subtilis) are necessary for the maturation of one specific target, whereas others (e.g., RNase J1 or RNase Y in B. subtilis) are more promiscuous and have a more global impact on RNA metabolism (12, 43, 58). The individual RNases differ not only in their respective amino acid sequences and in their number of substrates but also in their enzymatic mode of action. Two different classes of RNases can be defined: exoribonucleases, which remove RNA nucleotides one at a time from either the 3Ј or the 5Ј end, and endoribonucleases, which cleave within the RNA molecule. For the degradation of mRNAs, the conc...

No abstract

Cells of Bacillus subtilis can either be motile or sessile, depending on the expression of mutually exclusive sets of genes that are required for flagellum or biofilm formation, respectively. Both activities are coordinated by the master regulator SinR. We have analyzed the role of the previously uncharacterized ymdB gene for bistable gene expression in B. subtilis. We observed a strong overexpression of the hag gene encoding flagellin and of other genes of the D -dependent motility regulon in the ymdB mutant, whereas the two major operons for biofilm formation, tapA-sipW-tasA and epsA-O, were not expressed. As a result, the ymdB mutant is unable to form biofilms. An analysis of the individual cells of a population revealed that the ymdB mutant no longer exhibited bistable behavior; instead, all cells are short and motile. The inability of the ymdB mutant to form biofilms is suppressed by the deletion of the sinR gene encoding the master regulator of biofilm formation, indicating that SinR-dependent repression of biofilm genes cannot be relieved in a ymdB mutant. Our studies demonstrate that lack of expression of SlrR, an antagonist of SinR, is responsible for the observed phenotypes. Overexpression of SlrR suppresses the effects of a ymdB mutation.