This review article addresses academic contributions on the topic of Pan-Slavism published in the 2000–2020 period by reviewing the scholarly literature based on two categories: publications discussing traditional/historical forms of Pan-Slavism, and those focusing on the contemporary forms of Pan-Slavism. Further, the article introduces considerations on the need to study contemporary Pan-Slavism and its manifestations in a more coherent manner and from several vantage points that, to date, have been largely unaddressed in the scholarship at hand. The article not only fills the research gap in this regard but additionally points toward research challenges concerning contemporary Pan-Slavism that should be addressed in the future.
This article examines the Czech political scene, by focusing on the attitude of the main political parties in the Czech Republic and their attitude towards the issue of migration quotas in the period between May 2015 and July 2017. It touches upon the migration quota issue by, first of all, shortly describing main characteristics of Czech political parties in terms of European integration in general and additionally by discussing the modes in which Czech political parties comprehended the migration quota issue and what sort of messages they communicate to the Czech public in this respect. Methodologically, the article rests upon both Content Analysis and, to a lesser degree, Discourse Analysis, and proves that Czech political parties did not only have negative views of the quota issue during the stated period, but some of them also referred to this particular matter when discussing the Czech position (and the future) in the European Union.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.