Objectives: Disseminated bone marrow (BM) involvement is frequent in multiple myeloma (MM). Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) enables to evaluate the whole BM. Reading of such whole-body scans is time-consuming, and yet radiologists can transfer only a small fraction of the information of the imaging data set to the report. This limits the influence that imaging can have on clinical decision-making and in research toward precision oncology. The objective of this feasibility study was to implement a concept for automatic, comprehensive characterization of the BM from wb-MRI, by automatic BM segmentation and subsequent radiomics analysis of 30 different BM spaces (BMS). Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicentric pilot study used a total of 106 wb-MRI from 102 patients with (smoldering) MM from 8 centers. Fifty wb-MRI from center 1 were used for training of segmentation algorithms (nnU-Nets) and radiomics algorithms. Fifty-six wb-MRI from 8 centers, acquired with a variety of different MRI scanners and protocols, were used for independent testing. Manual segmentations of 2700 BMS from 90 wb-MRI were performed for training and testing of the segmentation algorithms. For each BMS, 296 radiomics features were calculated individually. Dice score was used to assess similarity between automatic segmentations and manual reference segmentations. Results: The "multilabel nnU-Net" segmentation algorithm, which performs segmentation of 30 BMS and labels them individually, reached mean dice scores of 0.88 ± 0.06/0.87 ± 0.06/0.83 ± 0.11 in independent test sets from center 1/center 2/center 3-8 (interrater variability between radiologists, 0.88 ± 0.01). The subset from the multicenter, multivendor test set (center 3-8) that was of high imaging quality was segmented with high precision (mean dice score, 0.87), comparable to the internal test data from center 1. The radiomic BM phenotype consisting of 8880 descriptive parameters per patient, which result from calculation of 296 radiomics features for each of the 30 BMS, was calculated for all patients.Exemplary cases demonstrated connections between typical BM patterns in MM and radiomic signatures of the respective BMS. In plausibility tests, predicted size and weight based on radiomics models of the radiomic BM phenotype significantly correlated with patients' actual size and weight (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of automatic, objective, comprehensive BM characterization from wb-MRI in multicentric data sets. This concept allows the extraction of high-dimensional phenotypes to capture the complexity of disseminated BM disorders from imaging. Further studies need to assess the clinical potential of this method for automatic staging, therapy response assessment, or prediction of biopsy results.
Background/ObjectivesApparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal intensity (SI) measurements play an increasing role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of monoclonal plasma cell disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess interrater variability, repeatability, and reproducibility of ADC and SI measurements from bone marrow (BM) under variation of MRI protocols and scanners.Patients and MethodsFifty-five patients with suspected or confirmed monoclonal plasma cell disorder were prospectively included in this institutional review board–approved study and underwent several measurements after the standard clinical whole-body MR scan, including repeated scan after repositioning, scan with a second MRI protocol, scan at a second 1.5 T scanner with a harmonized MRI protocol, and scan at a 3 T scanner. For T1-weighted, T2-weighted STIR, B800 images, and ADC maps, regions of interest were placed in the BM of the iliac crest and sacral bone, and in muscle tissue for image normalization. Bland-Altman plots were constructed, and absolute bias, relative bias to mean, limits of agreement, and coefficients of variation were calculated.ResultsInterrater variability and repeatability experiments showed a maximal relative bias of −0.077 and a maximal coefficient of variation of 16.2% for all sequences. Although the deviations at the second 1.5 T scanner with harmonized MRI protocol to the first 1.5 T scanner showed a maximal relative bias of 0.124 for all sequences, the variation of the MRI protocol and scan at the 3 T scanner led to large relative biases of up to −0.357 and −0.526, respectively. When comparing the 3 T scanner to the 1.5 T scanner, normalization to muscle reduced the bias of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, but not of ADC maps.ConclusionsThe MRI scanners with identical field strength and harmonized MRI protocols can provide relatively stable quantitative measurements of BM ADC and SI. Deviations in MRI field strength and MRI protocol should be avoided when applying ADC cutoff values, which were established at other scanners or when performing multicentric imaging trials.
Objectives: Despite the extensive number of publications in the field of radiomics, radiomics algorithms barely enter large-scale clinical application. Supposedly, the low external generalizability of radiomics models is one of the main reasons, which hinders the translation from research to clinical application. The objectives of this study were to investigate reproducibility of radiomics features (RFs) in vivo under variation of patient positioning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence, and MRI scanners, and to identify a subgroup of RFs that shows acceptable reproducibility across all different acquisition scenarios.Materials and Methods: Between November 30, 2020 and February 16, 2021, 55 patients with monoclonal plasma cell disorders were included in this prospective, bi-institutional, single-vendor study. Participants underwent one reference scan at a 1.5 T MRI scanner and several retest scans: once after simple repositioning, once with a second MRI protocol, once at another 1.5 T scanner, and once at a 3 T scanner. Radiomics feature from the bone marrow of the left hip bone were extracted, both from original scans and after different image normalizations. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess RF repeatability and reproducibility. Results: Fifty-five participants (mean age, 59 ± 7 years; 36 men) were enrolled. For T1-weighted images after muscle normalization, in the simple test-retest experiment, 110 (37%) of 295 RFs showed an ICC ≥0.8: 54 (61%) of 89 first-order features (FOFs), 35 (95%) of 37 volume and shape features, and 21 (12%) of 169 texture features (TFs). When the retest was performed with different technical settings, even after muscle normalization, the number of FOF/TF with an ICC ≥0.8 declined to 58/13 for the second protocol, 29/7 for the second 1.5 T scanner, and 49/7 for the 3 T scanner, respectively. Twenty-five (28%) of the 89 FOFs and 6 (4%) of the 169 TFs from muscle-normalized T1-weighted images showed an ICC ≥0.8 throughout all repeatability and reproducibility experiments. Conclusions: In vivo, only few RFs are reproducible with different MRI sequences or different MRI scanners, even after application of a simple image normalization. Radiomics features selected by a repeatability experiment only are not necessarily suited to build radiomics models for multicenter clinical application. This study isolated a subset of RFs, which are robust to variations in MRI acquisition observed in scanners from 1 vendor, and therefore are candidates to build reproducible radiomics models for monoclonal plasma cell disorders for multicentric applications, at least when centers are equipped with scanners from this vendor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.