Background. Microscopic evaluation of excised intraductal breast carcinoma (DCIS) specimens using a serial subgross technique reveals that in many patients the lesion is larger than expected, often making complete excision impossible with less than a true quadrantectomy. Data is presented on 181 patients with DCIS in whom the initial biopsy was performed using a more cosmetic wide local excision rather than a true quadrantectomy.
Methods. Clear margins were defined as no tumor within 1 mm of any inked or dyed margin. All of these patients subsequently underwent mastectomy or reexcision of the initial biopsy site. This allowed pathologic evaluation for residual disease.
Results. At mastectomy or reexcision, 76% of patients with initially involved margins had residual DCIS, as did 43% of patients with initially clear margins (P ≤ 0.0001). Larger tumor size was a statistically significant predictor of initial margin involvement and residual DCIS (P ≤ 0.05). Patients with comedo‐DCIS had a greater tendency toward positive initial histologic margins and residual DCIS, but this trend was not statistically significant (P ≤ 0.1).
Conclusion. DCIS presents major problems to both surgeons and pathologists. It is difficult to excise completely using a wide local excision. Histologically negative margins do not guarantee that residual DCIS has not been left behind. Inadequate excision of the primary lesion may be the most important cause of local failure after conservative treatment for intraductal breast carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 73:2985–9.
Two cases of acardiac fetuses are presented. Pathological data in 61 cases are tabulated. Cliassification, terminology and patho-physiological findings are discussed. The Acardiac Monster is a form of monozygotic multiple gestation lacking a physiological heart and resulting in a bizarre fetal malformation which is sustained in utero by parasitic anastomoses to the circulation of a normal twin fetus. The precise etiology of this phenomenon is still obscure and suggestions are made for the future evaluation of the acardiac fetus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.