Background HIV-infected and HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children have an increased risk of measles that may be due to altered immune responses or suboptimal timing of measles vaccination. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of measles vaccination in HIV-infected and HEU children. Methods For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health Library and IndMED on May 9, 2018. Studies were included if they reported on safety or seroresponse (either seroprotection/seropositivity/seroconversion) after measles vaccination in HIV-infected or HEU children. We calculated pooled estimates to compare immunogenicity outcomes between HIV-infected, HEU and HIV-unexposed children, using risk ratios [RRs] (with 95%CIs). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017057411. Findings Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria (15,363 children). Twenty-eight studies reported on safety; vaccine-associated adverse events and deaths were uncommon. Sixty-two studies reported on immunogenicity, 27 were included in the meta-analysis. HIV-infected children had lower seroresponse rates after primary vaccination compared with HIV-unexposed (RR 0.74; 95%CI: 0.61–0.90, I 2 = 85.9%) and HEU children (0.78; 0.69–0.88, I 2 = 77.1%), which was mitigated by antiretroviral therapy and time interval between vaccination and serology. HEU and HIV-unexposed children had similar seroresponses. Vaccination at 6-months resulted in similar proportions of HIV-infected children having seroresponse compared with HIV-unexposed (0.96; 0.77–1.19) and HEU children (1.00; 0.73–1.37, I 2 = 63.7%). Interpretation Primary measles vaccination at 6-months of age may provide protection against measles during early infancy in settings with high prevalence of maternal HIV-infection, however, further studies are needed to evaluate this strategy in HEU children and HIV-infected children receiving antiretroviral therapy. Funding South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation in Vaccine Preventable Diseases; Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit.
BackgroundHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected and HIV-exposed–uninfected (HEU) children may be at increased risk of measles infection due to waning of immunity following vaccination. We evaluated persistence of antibodies to measles vaccination at 4.5 years of age in HIV-unexposed, HEU, and HIV-infected children with CD4+ ≥25% previously randomized to immediate antiretroviral therapy (ART) interrupted at 12 months (HIV/Immed-ART-12), 24 months (HIV/Immed-ART-24), or when clinically/immunologically indicated (HIV/Def-ART). The HIV/Def-ART group initiated ART by median 5.8 (interquartile range, 4.4–10.3) months of age.MethodsIn this study, HIV-unexposed (n = 95), HEU (n = 84), HIV/Immed-ART-12 (n = 70), HIV/Immed-ART-24 (n = 70), and HIV/Def-ART (n = 62) children were scheduled to receive measles vaccination at age 9 and 15–18 months. Antimeasles serum immunoglobulin G titers were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 4.5 years.ResultsCompared with HIV-unexposed children (2860 mIU/mL), measles antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) were significantly lower in both HIV/Immed-ART-12 (571; P < .001) and HIV/Immed-ART-24 (1136; P < .001) but similar in the HIV/Def-ART (2777) and HEU (3242) groups. Furthermore, compared with HIV-unexposed, antibody titers ≥330 mIU/mL (ie, presumed serocorrelate for protection; 99%) were also significantly lower in HIV/Immed-ART-12 (70%; P < .001) and HIV/Immed-ART-24 (83%; P < .001) but similar in the HIV/Def-ART (90%) and HEU (98%) groups.ConclusionsHIV-infected children in whom ART was interrupted at either 12 or 24 months had lower GMTs and lower proportions with seroprotective titers than HIV-unexposed children, indicating a potential downside of ART treatment interruption.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT00099658 and NCT00102960.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.