Antecedentes: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha alterado considerablemente los procedimientos habituales de los sistemas sanitarios en todo el mundo. El trabajo diario se ha vuelto física y emocionalmente agotador para los profesionales sanitarios, obligados a afrontar y adaptarse a nuevos retos y situaciones estresantes. Esta situación pesa sobre la práctica diaria de enfermería.Objetivo: El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar la percepción del paciente sobre los cuidados de enfermería humanizados recibidos durante su estancia hospitalaria.Método: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, cuantitativo, transversal, en el que se realizaron entrevistas telefónicas a 357 personas >18 años que ingresaron durante más de 24 horas en el Hospital de León con el fin de evaluar la percepción del paciente. Uno de los instrumentos utilizados fue la Escala de Percepción de Conductas del Cuidado de Enfermería Humanizado (PCHE), para evaluar en tres dimensiones (D): cualidades de la práctica de enfermería (D1), apertura a la comunicación enfermera-paciente (D2) y disposición al cuidado (D3). El otro instrumento utilizado fue una encuesta de satisfacción institucional para conocer la opinión sobre la calidad de la atención al cliente en el área de hospitalización.Resultados: El porcentaje de pacientes que puntuaron como “siempre” cada dimensión fue: D1 = 91,2%; D2 = 81,4%; y D3 = 87,8%. La satisfacción del paciente obtuvo una puntuación media de 4,6 sobre 5. Conclusión: A pesar del impacto negativo del COVID-19 en el sistema de salud, los pacientes percibieron la atención de enfermería humanizada recibida como muy satisfactoria. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has heavily altered regular procedures of healthcare systems worldwide. Daily work has become physically and emotionally exhausting for health care professionals, forced to face and adapt to new challenges and stressful situations. This situation weighs on the daily nursing practice and might have an impact on the quality of care provided and on the level of satisfaction perceived by hospitalized patients. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the patient’s perception of humanized nursing care received during their hospital stay. Methods: A descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study was carried out, in which telephone interviews were conducted in 357 people >18 years of age who were admitted for more than 24 hours to the Hospital de León in order to asses patient´s perception. One instrument used was The Perception of Behaviors of Humanized Nursing Care Scale (PCHE), to evaluate in three dimensions (D): qualities of nursing practice (D1), openness to nurse–patient communication (D2), and willingness to care (D3). In addition, an institutional satisfaction survey was performed to know the opinion on the quality of customer service in hospitalization area. Results: The percentage of patients scoring as “always” every dimension was: D1 = 91.2%; D2= 81.4%; and D3= 87.8%. Patient satisfaction obtained a mean score of 4.6 out of 5. 42.3% of population were men and 57.7% were women, most in the age range 61–75 years. The predominant marital status and educational level were married and basic–medium, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the negative impact of COVID-19 in the health care system, patients perceived humanized nursing care received as very successful.

Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) which is the most common type of dementia is characterized by mental or cognitive disorders. People suffering with this condition find it inherently difficult to communicate and describe symptoms. As a consequence, both detection and treatment of comorbidities associated with Alzheimer’s disease are substantially impaired. Equally, action protocols in the case of emergencies must be clearly formulated and stated. Methods: We performed a bibliography search followed by an observational and cross-sectional study involving a thorough review of medical records. A group of AD patients was compared with a control group. Each group consisted of 100 people and were all León residents aged ≥65 years. Results: The following comorbidities were found to be associated with AD: cataracts, urinary incontinence, osteoarthritis, hearing loss, osteoporosis, and personality disorders. The most frequent comorbidities in the control group were the following: eye strain, stroke, vertigo, as well as circulatory and respiratory disorders. Comorbidities with a similar incidence in both groups included type 2 diabetes mellitus, glaucoma, depression, obesity, arthritis, and anxiety. We also reviewed emergency procedures employed in the case of an emergency involving an AD patient. Conclusions: Some comorbidities were present in both the AD and control groups, while others were found in the AD group and not in the control group, and vice versa.

No abstract