Our findings support the feasibility of exercise training interventions during hospitalization, including immunocompromised children.

Childhood cancer patients are at risk of developing important adverse effects, mortality and disease relapse after treatments, which has a substantial economic impact on healthcare systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of supervised inhospital exercise on clinical endpoints during childhood cancer treatment.169 children with a new diagnosis of cancer were divided into an exercise intervention (n = 68, 11 ± 4 years) or a control group (n = 101, 11 ± 3 years). The cohort was followed up from the start of treatment for up to five years. Supervised inhospital exercise intervention was performed during the neoadjuvant (for solid tumors) or intensive chemotherapy treatment period (for leukemias). The median duration of the intervention was 22 (interquartile range, 14-28) weeks. We assessed survival, risk of disease relapse or metastasis, and days of hospitalization (primary outcomes), and cardiovascular function, anthropometry and blood variables (secondary outcomes).No exercise-related adverse events were noted. The exercise group had significantly less days of hospitalization than the control group (P = .031), resulting in a lower (~−17%) mean total economic cost of hospitalization in the former. Moreover, echocardiography-determined left ventricular function (ejection fraction and fractional shortening) was significantly impaired in the control group after treatment compared with baseline, whereas it was maintained in the exercise group (P = .024 and .021 for the between-group differences, respectively). In conclusion, supervised inhospital exercise intervention is safe and plays a cardioprotective role, at least in the short term, in children with cancer, also reducing hospitalization time, and therefore alleviating the economic burden.

No abstract

Graft-versus-host disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. First-line treatment is based on the use of high doses of corticosteroids. Unfortunately, second-line treatment for both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, remains a challenge. Ruxolitinib has been shown as an effective and safe treatment option for these patients. Seventy-nine patients received ruxolitinib and were evaluated in this retrospective and multicenter study. Twenty-three patients received ruxolitinib for refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after a median of 3 (range 1-5) previous lines of therapy. Overall response rate was 69.5% (16/23) which was obtained after a median of 2 weeks of treatment, and 21.7% (5/23) reached complete remission. Fifty-six patients were evaluated for refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-10). Overall response rate was 57.1% (32/56) with 3.5% (2/56) obtaining complete remission after a median of 4 weeks. Tapering of corticosteroids was possible in both acute (17/23, 73%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (32/56, 57.1%) groups. Overall survival was 47% (CI: 23-67%) at 6 months for patients with aGVHD (62 vs 28% in responders vs non-responders) and 81% (CI: 63-89%) at 1 year for patients with cGVHD (83 vs 76% in responders vs non-responders). Ruxolitinib in the real life setting is an effective and safe treatment option for GVHD, with an ORR of 69.5% and 57.1% for refractory acute and chronic graftversus-host disease, respectively, in heavily pretreated patients.

Ruxolitinib is a promising treatment for steroid refractory graft-vs-host disease (GvHD). However, data concerning effects on T cells are probably involved in increased risk of opportunistic infections. We analyzed clinical and immunological changes in children with GvHD taking ruxolitinib. Twenty-two children that underwent transplantation and received ruxolitinib were included. Ruxolitinib indication was acute and chronic GvHD in 13 and 9 patients, respectively.Overall response rate (ORR) in acute GvHD and chronic GvHD was high, of 77% and 89%, respectively. Ruxolitinib was associated with an increase in CD4 effector memory (EM), and decrease of CD4 central memory percentage. CD4 regulatory T cells percentage decreased significantly. Patients who achieved complete response to ruxolitinib had higher natural killer (NK) cells before ruxolitinib that patients who did not respond. Also there was an increase of CD4 lymphocytes percentage, with decrease of CD8 and NK cells percentage in responders against non-responders. There were 54%, 18% and 13% of infections caused by virus, bacteria and fungi, respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 19 AE 9% and 28 AE 10%, respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival rate at 2 years were 62 AE 11% and 58 AE 11%, respectively. Ruxolitinib is a promising treatment for acute and chronic GvHD with a high ORR of 77% and 89%, respectively. It produces important changes in immune system, such as increase of CD4 EM cells and decrease in NK and regulatory T cells. Now, we need pharmacokinetic studies to determine ruxolitinib dose in children and close surveillance and antimicrobial prophylaxis.