No abstract

Background The durability of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody response and the resulting immunity to COVID‐19 is unclear. Objectives To investigate long‐term humoral immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2. Methods In this nationwide, longitudinal study, we determined antibody response in 411 patients aged 0–93 years from two waves of infections (March to December 2020) contributing 1063 blood samples. Each individual had blood drawn on 4–5 occasions 1–15 months after disease onset. We measured total anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor‐binding domain (RBD) antibody using a qualitative RBD sandwich ELISA, IgM, IgG and IgA levels using an quantitative in‐house ELISA‐based assay  and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) using an in‐house ELISA‐based pseudoneutralizing assay. IgG subclasses were analyzed in a subset of samples by ELISA‐based assay. We used nonlinear models to study the durability of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody responses and its influence over time. Results After 15 months, 94% still had detectable circulating antibodies, mainly the IgG isotype, and 92% had detectable NAbs. The distribution of IgG antibodies varied significantly over time, characterized by a biphasic pattern with an initial decline followed by a plateau after approximately 7 months. However, the NAbs remained relatively stable throughout the period. The strength of the antibody response was influenced by smoking and hospitalization, with lower IgG levels in smokers and higher levels in hospitalized individuals. Antibody stability over time was mainly associated with male sex and older age with higher initial levels but more marked decrease. Conclusions The humoral immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection varies depending on behavioral factors and disease severity, and antibody stability over 15 months was associated with sex and age.