SSI-guided anesthesia resulted in lower remifentanil consumption, more stable hemodynamics, and a lower incidence of unwanted events.

Regarding these results, the authors recommend performing muscle biopsies for histologic examination and IVCT in patients with ER. In addition, the patient should be seen by a neurologist and screened for genetic abnormalities to shed light on the genetics of MH.

Retrospectively analyzed HRV of patients scheduled to undergo elective cesarean delivery during SAB showed significant differences depending on the severity of hypotension after SAB. Preliminary findings were prospectively confirmed. High LF/HF before SAB predicted severe hypotension. Preoperative HRV analysis may detect patients at risk of hypotension after SAB.

SummaryThe aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of different durations of active pre-operative skin-surface warming (pre-warming) to prevent peri-operative hypothermia and postoperative shivering. We randomly assigned 200 patients, scheduled for surgery of 30-90 min under general anaesthesia, to receive passive insulation or forced-air skin surface warming for 10, 20 or 30 min. Body temperature was measured at the tympanic membrane. Shivering was graded by visual inspection. There were significant differences in changes of core temperature between the nonpre-warmed group and all the pre-warmed groups (p < 0.00001), but none between the three pre-warmed groups (p = 0.54). Without pre-warming, 38/55 (69%) patients became hypothermic (< 36°C) at the end of anaesthesia, whereas only 7 ⁄ 52 (13%), 3 ⁄ 43 (7%) and 3 ⁄ 50 (6%) patients following 10, 20 or 30 min pre-warming, respectively, became hypothermic (p < 0.001 vs no pre-warming). Shivering was observed in 10 patients without, and in three, three and one patients with pre-warming in the respective groups (p = 0.02). Pre-warming of patients for only 10 or 20 min before general anaesthesia mostly prevents hypothermia and reduces shivering.

Alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil are synthetic opioid analgesics acting at specific opioid receptors. These opioids are widely used as analgesics to supplement general anaesthesia for various surgical procedures or as primary anaesthetic agents in very high doses during cardiac surgery. Fentanyl and sufentanil especially are administered via infusion for long term analgesia and sedation in intensive care patients. Opioid analgesics are mainly administered using the intravenous route. However, other techniques of administration, including epidural, intrathecal, transdermal and intranasal applications, have been demonstrated. Important pharmacokinetic differences between alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil have been shown in many reports. Alfentanil has the most rapid analgesic onset and time to peak effect as well as the shortest distribution and elimination half-lives. The volume of distribution and total body clearance of this agent are smaller when compared with those of fentanyl and sufentanil. The pharmacokinetics of the opioid analgesics can be affected by several factors including patient age, plasma protein content, acid-base status and cardiopulmonary bypass, but not significantly by renal insufficiency or compensated hepatic dysfunction. In addition, pharmacokinetic properties can be influenced by changes in hepatic blood flow and administration of drug combinations which compete for the same plasma protein carrier or metabolising pathway. Although comparing specific pharmacokinetic parameters such as half-lives is deeply entrenched in the literature and clinical practice, simply comparing half-lives is not a rational way to select an opioid for specific requirements. Using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models, computer simulations based on changes in the effect site opioid concentration or context-sensitive half-times seem to be extremely useful for selecting an opioid on a more rational basis.

SummaryThe newly introduced Nexfin Ò device allows analysis of the blood pressure trace produced by a non-invasive finger cuff.We compared the cardiac output derived from the Nexfin and PiCCO, using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution, during cardiac surgery. Forty patients with preserved left ventricular function undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were studied after induction of general anaesthesia and until discharge to the intensive care unit. There was a significant correlation between Nexfin and PiCCO before (r 2 = 0.81, p < 0.001) and after (r 2 = 0.56, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated the mean bias of Nexfin to be )0.1 (95% limits of agreement )0.6 to +0.5, percentage error 23%) and )0.1 ()0.8 to +0.6, 26%) l.min )1.m )2 , before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, respectively. After a passive leg-raise was performed, there was also good correlation between the two methods, both before (r 2 = 0.72, p < 0.001) and after (r 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001) cardiopulmonary bypass. We conclude that the Nexfin is a reliable method of measuring cardiac output during and after cardiac surgery.

Heart rate variability analysis before SA may predict hypotension after SA with high sensitivity and specificity. LF/HF may be a tool to detect patients at high risk of hypotension due to SA. This indicates that the predictive value of LF/HF is superior to established predictors.

The PVI was not able to predict fluid responsiveness with sufficient accuracy. In patients with higher perfusion states, the PVI improved its ability to predict haemodynamic changes, strongly suggesting a relevant influence of the PI on the PVI.