The social organization of gregarious lemurs significantly deviates from predictions of the socioecological model, as they form small groups in which the number of males approximately equals the number of females. This study uses models of reproductive skew theory as a new approach to explain this unusual group composition, in particular the high number of males, in a representative of these lemurs, the redfronted lemur (Eulemur fulvus rufus). We tested two central predictions of "concession" models of reproductive skew theory, which assume that subordinates may be allowed limited reproduction by dominant group members as an incentive to remain in the group, thereby increasing the group's overall productivity. Accordingly, relatives are predicted to receive less reproduction than non-relatives, and the overall amount of reproductive concessions given to subordinates is predicted to increase as the number of subordinates increases. In addition, we tested whether the number of females in a group, a variable not previously incorporated in reproductive skew theory, affected reproductive skew among males. Using microsatellite analyses of tissue DNA, we determined paternities of 49 offspring born into our study population in Kirindy forest (western Madagascar) since 1996 to determine patterns of male reproductive skew to test these predictions. Our analyses revealed remarkable reproductive skew, with 71% of all infants being sired by dominant males, but both predictions of reproductive skew models could not be supported. Instead, the number of females best predicted the apportionment of reproduction among the males in this species, suggesting that current reproductive skew models need to incorporate this factor to predict reproductive partitioning among male primates and perhaps other group-living mammals.

No abstract

No abstract

The evolution of group living has attracted considerable attention from behavioral ecologists working on a wide range of study species. However, theoretical research in this field has been largely focused on cooperative breeders. We extend this line of work to species that lack alloparental care (hereafter termed "noncooperative species") but that may benefit from grouping by jointly defending a common territory. We adopt a demographically explicit approach in which the rates of births and deaths as well as the dispersal decisions of individuals in the population determine the turnover rates of territories and the competition for breeding vacancies thus arising. Our results reveal that some of the factors thought to affect the evolution of cooperative breeding also affect the evolution of group living in noncooperative species. Specifically, high fecundity and low mortality of resident individuals both increase the degree of habitat saturation and make joining an established group more profitable for nonresidents (floaters). Moreover, if floaters can forcefully take over territories, the degree of habitat saturation also affects the chance that residents become targets of takeovers. In this situation, communal defense of territories becomes an important benefit that further promotes the evolution of group living.