The endothelin (ET) system has emerged as a novel target for hypertension treatment where a medical need persists despite availability of several pharmacological classes, including renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. ET receptor antagonism has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models of hypertension, especially under low-renin conditions and in hypertensive patients. We investigated the pharmacology of aprocitentan (N-[5-(4bromophenyl)-6-[2-[(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]ethoxy]-4pyrimidinyl]-sulfamide), a potent dual ET A /ET B receptor antagonist, on blood pressure (BP) in two models of experimental hypertension: deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt rats (lowrenin model) and spontaneously hypertensive rats [(SHR), normal renin model]. We also compared the effect of its combination with RAS blockers (valsartan and enalapril) with that of the combination of the mineraloreceptor antagonist spironolactone with the same RAS blockers on BP and renal function in hypertensive rats. Aprocitentan was more potent and efficacious in lowering BP in conscious DOCA-salt rats than in SHRs. In DOCA-salt rats, single oral doses of aprocitentan induced a dose-dependent and long-lasting BP decrease and 4-week administration of aprocitentan dose dependently decreased BP (statistically significant) and renal vascular resistance, and reduced left ventricle hypertrophy (nonsignificant). Aprocitentan was synergistic with valsartan and enalapril in decreasing BP in DOCA-salt rats and SHRs while spironolactone demonstrated additive effects with these RAS blockers. In hypertensive rats under sodium restriction and enalapril, addition of aprocitentan further decreased BP without causing renal impairment, in contrast to spironolactone. In conclusion, ET A /ET B receptor antagonism represents a promising therapeutic approach to hypertension, especially with low-renin characteristics, and could be used in combination with RAS blockers, without increasing the risk of renal impairment.

The P2Y12 receptor is a validated target for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare two direct‐acting, reversible P2Y12 antagonists, ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor, in a rat thrombosis model by simultaneous quantification of their antithrombotic efficacy and surgery‐induced blood loss. Blood flow velocity was assessed in the carotid artery after FeCl3‐induced thrombus formation using a Doppler flow probe. At the same time, blood loss after surgical wounding of the spleen was quantified. Continuous infusions of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor prevented the injury‐induced reduction of blood flow in a dose‐dependent manner. High doses of both antagonists normalized blood flow and completely abolished thrombus formation as confirmed by histology. Intermediate doses restored baseline blood flow to ≥65%. However, ACT‐246475 caused significantly less increase of blood loss than ticagrelor; the difference in blood loss was 2.6‐fold (P < 0.01) at high doses and 2.7‐fold (P < 0.05) at intermediate doses. Potential reasons for this unexpected difference were explored by measuring the effects of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor on vascular tone. At concentrations needed to achieve maximal antithrombotic efficacy, ticagrelor compared with ACT‐246475 significantly increased carotid blood flow velocity in vivo (P = 0.003), induced vasorelaxation of precontracted rat femoral arteries, and inhibited contraction of femoral artery induced by electrical field stimulation or by phenylephrine. Overall, ACT‐246475 showed a significantly wider therapeutic window than ticagrelor. The absence of vasodilatory effects due to high selectivity of ACT‐246475 for P2Y12 provides potential arguments for the observed safety advantage of ACT‐246475 over ticagrelor.

Selatogrel, a potent and reversible antagonist of the P2Y12 receptor, inhibited FeCl3-induced thrombosis in rats. Here, we report the anti-thrombotic effect of selatogrel after subcutaneous applications in guinea pigs and mice. Selatogrel inhibited platelet function only 10 min after subcutaneous application in mice. In addition, in a modified Folts thrombosis model in guinea pigs, selatogrel prevented a decrease in blood-flow, indicative of the inhibition of ongoing thrombosis, approximately 10 min after subcutaneous injection. Selatogrel fully normalised blood flow; therefore, we speculate that it may not only prevent, but also dissolve, platelet thrombi. Thrombus dissolution was investigated using real-time intravital microscopy in mice. The infusion of selatogrel during ongoing platelet thrombus formation stopped growth and induced the dissolution of the preformed platelet thrombus. In addition, platelet-rich thrombi were given 30 min to consolidate in vivo. The infusion of selatogrel dissolved the preformed and consolidated platelet thrombi. Dissolution was limited to the disintegration of the occluding part of the platelet thrombi, leaving small mural platelet aggregates to seal the blood vessel. Therefore, our experiments uncovered a novel advantage of selatogrel: the dissolution of pre-formed thrombi without the disintegration of haemostatic seals, suggesting a bipartite benefit of the early application of selatogrel in patients with acute thrombosis.