Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to carry out a literature review of studies that have analyzed the effects of process orientation (PO). Design/methodology/approach -An examination of the literature is undertaken to review studies that report about the influence of PO on organizational performance. Studies are classified into statements without straight empirical support, quantitative studies, and case studies. Findings -A total of 26 studies are identified that report about effects of PO on organizational performance. Studies where positive effects are obtained are predominant. The effects most often reported are speed improvements, increase of customer satisfaction, improvement of quality, reduction of cost, and improvement of financial performance.Research limitations/implications -According to the results of the paper, positive effects of PO are clearly more often reported than negative effects. It might be the case that popular press and case studies tend to report positive effects more often than no (or negative) effects. This possible bias towards positive effects is an important limitation of this paper. The paper identifies a lack of quantitative studies investigating the effects of PO on organizational performance. Practical implications -The paper offers interesting implications for managers, pointing out that a process-oriented organizational design may result in a positive influence on organizational performance. Originality/value -The findings are derived from a comprehensive literature review of studies that have investigated the PO-organizational performance link. In addition, ideas for improving future research in this field are provided.
Purpose -Attention to processes has increased, as thousands of firms have adopted the process view of their organization. Process orientation (PO) means focusing on business processes rather than emphasizing functional structure or hierarchy. Despite the huge growth in the business process management literature, a methodological gap still remains about a certain ambiguity in the definition of the construct specifying its theoretical domain and dimensionalization. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the literature on PO through the creation and validation of a model to measure the key dimensions of the PO construct. Design/methodology/approach -The authors derive from literature several dimensions which shape the concept of PO. In a second step, the study includes factor analysis on a sample of 152 Austrian manufacturing companies to verify that the model is empirical valid. Findings -The paper provides insight in the concept of PO. It concludes that PO is a multidimensional construct, consisting of the following dimensions: design and documentation of business processes; management commitment towards PO; the process owner role; process performance measurement; a corporate culture in line with the process approach; application of continuous process improvement methodologies; and process-oriented organizational structure.Research limitations/implications -The sample used in this work only included Austrian firms operating in manufacturing industry. Generalizability of the findings to other industries or other countries is open to scrutiny. Originality/value -Several studies into process management use proxy variables as an indicator for PO (e.g. ISO 9000 certification). Other studies treat the construct as a unidimensional measure. However, unidimensional measures meet with increasing criticism, as they turn out to be insufficient to capture the richness of such a complex construct. This paper attempts to rectify the content deficiencies in the literature on the construct by specifying its theoretical domain and dimensionalization.
Several organizations choose a process-oriented organizational design as a source for competitive advantage. In this paper, we explore empirically the relationship between process orientation (PO) and firm performance. We consider PO as a multidimensional construct and examine how its underlying dimensions impact different aspects of organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach We use an exploratory research design and investigate the effects of the different PO dimensions on profitability, customer satisfaction, product quality, and time-based performance using a random sample of Austrian manufacturing firms. Findings The empirical findings reveal that process performance measurement, a process-oriented organizational structure, the application of continuous process improvement methods, and-in particular-a culture in line with the process approach, are significantly and positively associated with organizational performance. Originality/value While a few studies examined the effects of PO on financial performance, there is a clear lack of quantitative studies investigating the effects of PO on other, non-financial performance measures. In addition, since most of the existing studies treated PO as a single measure, there is a clear lack of studies that investigate the performance effects of individual PO dimensions. We incorporate the multidimensional nature of PO and examine the effects of individual PO dimensions on several firm performance aspects.
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore empirically the interaction effect of process performance measurement and the process owner role on organizational performance.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of Austrian manufacturing companies, the paper uses multivariate data analysis techniques to test the joint effect of process performance measurement and process ownership on firm performance.FindingsThe empirical evidence indicates that implementing process performance measurement or the process owner role only is insufficient to achieve high performance. Organizations must implement both concepts – process performance measurement and the process owner role – to reap the fruits of process management.Research limitations/implicationsSeveral research limitations apply. First, the sample only included Austrian manufacturing firms. The generalizability of the findings to other industries or other countries is open to scrutiny. Second, only one interview per firm was conducted. Interviewing several managers per firm would have led to even higher data quality. A third important limitation of this work is the small number of cases in the regression models. Such a small number of cases are not appropriate for a clear demonstration of empirical effects. Fourth, this work relies on survey data, which leaves open the possibility of self‐serving bias in the data.Practical implicationsThe promise of process management is to help firms gain competitive advantage, and, as such, managers facing organizational problems may adopt process management practices as a response to these problems. But managers must fully understand the concept of process management to ensure these practices are used in the appropriate contexts. Managers must understand the multidimensional nature of process orientation and the importance of its key dimensions. The empirical evidence of the study suggests that managers should put their effort into establishing process owners as well as process performance measurement as both process management concepts are needed in order to achieve firm performance improvements.Originality/valueWhile the importance of process management has often been highlighted, much more remains to be understood about the performance impact of specific process management practices. This paper focuses on the process owner role and process performance measurement – as empirical studies investigating the interaction effect of these two practices have been remarkably limited to date.
Although there is much emphasis on the importance of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation, little attention has been paid to their interactions and joint effects on a firm's innovation performance. In this paper, we empirically explore the interaction effect of continuous improvement as a dynamic capability and business process orientation on time‐to‐market speed. By employing a unique and hand‐collected dataset of Austrian manufacturing companies, it is shown that firms increase their innovation performance when they implement both—a process‐oriented organizational design and continuous improvement methodologies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.