The blue copper protein plastocyanin and the heme protein cytochrome c6 differ in composition and in structure but perform the same function in the photosynthetic electron-transport chain. We compare these two proteins on the basis of their electrostatic potentials in order to understand the structural basis of their functional equivalence. In the first approach, we use a monopole-dipole approximation of the electrostatic potentials to superimpose the proteins. The resulting alignment suggests that Tyr51 in cytochrome c6 corresponds to Tyr83 in plastocyanin. But since Tyr51 is not conserved in all known cytochrome c6 sequences, a physiological role of this residue is questionable. In a more sophisticated approach, we applied the recently-developed Fame (flexible alignment of molecule ensembles) algorithm, in which molecules are superimposed by optimizing the similarity of their electrostatic potentials with respect to the relative orientation of the molecules. On the basis of the Fame alignments of plastocyanin and cytochrome c6, we analyze the docking and the electron-transfer reactions of these two proteins with its physiological reaction partner cytochrome f. We derive functional analogies for individual amino acids in possible electron-transfer paths in the interprotein redox reactions. We identify two surface patches in cytochrome c6 that may be involved in electron-transfer paths. The hydrophobic patch with the exposed heme edge in cytochrome c6 may be equivalent to the hydrophobic patch with His87 in plastocyanin, whereas Trp63 in cytochrome c6 may be equivalent to Tyr83 in plastocyanin. An aromatic amino acid is present at the position of Trp63 in all known cytochrome c6 sequences. The electronic coupling between the heme and the copper site on the one side and several potentially important amino acid residues on the other is analyzed by the Pathways method. We have proposed recently that Lys65 of cytochrome f and Tyr83 of plastocyanin form a cation-pi system, which may be involved in a two-step mechanism of the electron-transfer reaction between these two proteins from higher plants. Now we corroborate this proposal by analyzing available amino acid sequences.
The two proteins ferredoxin and flavodoxin can replace each other in the photosynthetic electron transfer chain of cyanobacteria and algae. However, structure, size, and composition of ferredoxin and flavodoxin are completely different. Ferredoxin is a small iron-sulfur protein (ϳ100 amino acids), whereas flavodoxin is a flavin-containing protein (ϳ170 amino acids). The crystal structure of both proteins from the cyanobacteria Anabeana PCC 7120 is known. We used these two protein structures to investigate the structural basis of their functional equivalence. We apply the Hodgkin index to quantify the similarity of their electrostatic potentials. The technique has been applied successfully in indirect drug design for the alignment of small molecule and bioisosterism elucidation. It requires no predefined atom-atom correspondences. As is known from experiments, electrostatic interactions are most important for the association of ferredoxin and flavodoxin with their reaction partners photosystem I and ferredoxin-NADP reductase. Therefore, use of electrostatic potentials for the structural alignment is well justified. Our extensive search of the alignment space reveals two alignments with a high degree of similarity in the electrostatic potential. In both alignments, ferredoxin overlaps completely with flavodoxin. The active sites of ferredoxin and flavodoxin rather than their centers of mass coincide in both alignments. This is in agreement with electron microscopy investigations on photosystem I cross-linked to ferredoxin or flavodoxin. We identify residues that may have the same function in both proteins and relate our results to previous experimental data. Proteins 2000;38:301-309.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.