Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) represents approximately two-thirds of invasive urothelial bladder cancers (UBC) and has high morbidity and mortality. Men are over 3-fold more frequently affected by UBC than women. Despite intensive efforts to improve patient treatment and outcome, two-thirds of patients with UBC will have a recurrence or disease progression within 5 years. We demonstrated that the quantity and spatial distribution of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) predict stages of tumor inflammation, subtypes, and patient survival and correlate with expression of immune checkpoints in an analysis of 542 patients with MIBC. High sTILs indicated an inflamed subtype with an 80% 5-year DSS, and a lack of immune infiltrates identified an uninflamed subtype with a survival rate of less than 25%. A separate immune evading phenotype with upregulated immune checkpoints associated with poor survival. Within the TIME are tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), which can mediate antitumor activity via immune cells. High TLS amounts and close tumor distance correlated significantly with an inflamed phenotype and favorable survival. The uninflamed and evasion phenotypes showed lowest TLS numbers, farthest tumor distances, and shortest survival. High inflammation also correlated with increased neoantigen load and mutational burden. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy showed a favorable prognosis, which was dependent on high sTILs. Determination of sTILs and tumor subtypes may stratify therapy success and patient survival, and considering sTILs can easily be quantified using simple morphologic parameters, like hematoxylin and eosin, sTILs can be implemented for predicting patient survival in a routine manner.

No abstract

No abstract

Differential expression of cytokeratins (CK) is a characteristic feature of chemoresistant luminal (KRT20) and chemosensitive intrinsic aggressive basal (KRT5) subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We investigated mRNA expression of KRT5 and KRT20 and its predictive value in stage pT1 bladder cancer. In retrospective analysis of clinical data and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) of patients with stage pT1 NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of the bladder, a single-step RT-qPCR was used to measure mRNA expression. Furthermore, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CK20, panCK, and MIB1 was performed. Valid measurements were obtained from 231 samples out of a series of 284 patients. Spearman correlation revealed significant associations between mRNA and protein expression of KRT20/CK20 (ρ 0.6096, p < 0.0001) and MKI67/MIB1 (ρ 0.5467, p < 0.0001). A positive correlation was found between MKI67 and KRT20 expression (ρ 0.3492, p < 0.0001), while MKI67 and KRT5 were negatively correlated (ρ -0.1693, p = 0.01). High KRT20 expression (≥40.26) was significantly associated with worse recurrence free survival (RFS) (p = 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0003), and cancer specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.0414). The combination of high KRT20 expression and low KRT5 expression (<36.83) was associated with unfavorable RFS (p = 0.0038) and PFS (p = 0.0003) and proved to be the only independent predictor for RFS (p = 0.0055) and PFS (p = 0.0023) in multivariate analysis. KRT20 mRNA determination was superior to CK20 protein estimation with regard to RFS and PFS prediction. KRT20 and KRT5 mRNA quantification can predict recurrence and progression of stage pT1 NMIBC reflecting basal and luminal subtypes of MIBC and is superior to CK20 protein expression determined by IHC.

Five programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently approved for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper urinary tract. Due to restrictions by the FDA and EMA first-line treatment with Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab in platinum-ineligible patients requires immunohistochemical PD-L1 testing. In the secondline setting all drugs are approved without PD-L1 testing. Used PD-L1 assays in clinical trials include the 28-8 pharmDx (Nivolumab), the 22C3 pharmDx (Pembrolizumab), Ventana SP142 (Atezolizumab), and the Ventana PD-L1 SP263 assays (Durvalumab). Differences in antibodies, needed platforms and testing algorithms have raised questions about interchangeability and comparability among these assays and their diagnostic use. We provide a practical review about the current recommendations, used assays and algorithms of PD-L1 testing in urothelial carcinoma to help oncologists, urologists and pathologists to understand analytical features, differences in antibody assays, differences in scoring algorithms and comparability of various PD-L1 assays. We reviewed and summarized published studies from the last four years (2016-2019) on PD-L1 testing in bladder cancer and present a condensed practical guideline including pre-analytical, analytical and test-specific issues.

439 Background: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in MIBC improves survival which correlates with pathologic response (PaR) at radical cystectomy (RC). The combination of immunotherapy and NAC may improve PaR and outcomes in MIBC. We tested the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (N) with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC in our phase II trial (NCT03294304). Methods: Eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4a, N≤1, M0) who were candidates for RC were enrolled. Pts received C (70mg/m2) IV on D1, G (1000mg/m2) on D1,D8 and N (360 mg) IV on D8 every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by RC within 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was PaR (≤pT1,N0). Secondary objectives were safety of GC+N and PFS at 2 years. The correlative objectives based on pre-treatment biopsies were correlation of PaR with 1) WGS 2) molecular subtypes of BC; 3) PD-L1 expression; 4) baseline TILs, CD3, CD8 and CD56.. Evaluable pts. should have received at least 1 dose of N. PaR will be summarized by the PaR rate as estimated by the sample proportion with exact 95% confidence intervals. We specified a null PaR of 0.35 and an alternative hypothesis of 0.55; we will reject the null hypothesis if at least 20 of 41 pts. have a PaR. Results: Between Feb 2018 and June 2019, 41 pts. were enrolled (cT2N0 90%, cT3N0 7%, cT4N1 3%); 2 patients refused surgery but were included in ITT population. PaR was observed in 27/41 pts. (65.8%), including pts with N1 disease. The combination was safe with manageable toxicities and no deaths from treatment. Majority of AEs were from GC; the overall rates of grade 3-4 AEs was 20%, majority being neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and renal insufficiency. Immune related AEs were seen in 3 patients, 2 had "adenitis" which wasymptomatic,1 pt developed Guillian Barre Syndrome after surgery, which resolved with IVIG; and none of them required steroids. There was no delay in time to RC and no unexpected surgical complications from treatment. Patients are being followed for progression and survival. Correlative work is ongoing. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N+GC is safe and effective in MIBC with significant pathologic downstaging rates and no added toxicities or delay to surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03294304.

BackgroundTo determine safety and efficacy of single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel and durvalumab/tremelimumab in stage III-IVB head and neck cancer.MethodsPatients received a single cycle of cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1–3 and docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 combined with durvalumab 1500 mg fix dose on day 5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fix dose on day 5. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the rebiopsy after induction treatment or at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ cell density in the rebiopsy compared with baseline entered radioimmunotherapy with concomitant durvalumab/tremelimumab. The objective of this interim analysis was to analyze safety and efficacy of the chemoimmunotherapy-induction treatment before radioimmunotherapy.ResultsA total of 57 patients were enrolled, 56 were treated. Median pretreatment intratumoral CD8+ cell density was 342 cells/mm². After induction treatment, 27 patients (48%) had a pCR in the rebiopsy and further 25 patients (45%) had a relevant increase of intratumoral CD8+ cells (median increase by a factor of 3.0). Adverse event (AE) grade 3–4 appeared in 38 patients (68%) and mainly consisted of leukopenia (43%) and infections (29%). Six patients (11%) developed grade 3–4 immune-related AE. Univariate analysis computed p16 positivity, programmed death ligand 1 immune cell area and intratumoral CD8+ cell density as predictors of pCR. On multivariable analysis, intratumoral CD8+ cell density predicted pCR independently (OR 1.0012 per cell/mm², 95% CI 1.0001 to 1.0022, p=0.016). In peripheral blood CD8+ cells, the coexpression of programmed death protein 1 significantly increased especially in patients with pCR.ConclusionsSingle cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel and durvalumab/tremelimumab is feasible and achieves a high biopsy-proven pCR rate.

Epigenetic deregulation remarkably triggers mechanisms associated with tumor aggressiveness like epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Since EMT is a highly complex, but also reversible event, epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation or chromatin alterations must be involved in its regulation. It was recently described that loss of the cell cycle regulator p21 was associated with a gain in EMT characteristics and an upregulation of the master EMT transcription factor ZEB1. In this study, in silico analysis was performed in combination with different in vitro and in vivo techniques to identify and verify novel epigenetic targets of ZEB1, and to proof the direct transcriptional regulation of SETD1B by ZEB1. The chorioallantoic-membrane assay served as an in vivo model to analyze the ZEB1/SETD1B interaction. Bioinformatical analysis of CRC patient data was used to examine the ZEB1/ SETD1B network under clinical conditions and the ZEB1/SETD1B network was modeled under physiological and pathological conditions. Thus, we identified a self-reinforcing loop for ZEB1 expression and found that the SETD1B associated active chromatin mark H3K4me3 was enriched at the ZEB1 promoter in EMT cells. Moreover, clinical evaluation of CRC patient data showed that the simultaneous high expression of ZEB1 and SETD1B was correlated with the worst prognosis. Here we report that the expression of chromatin modifiers is remarkably dysregulated in EMT cells. SETD1B was identified as a new ZEB1 target in vitro and in vivo. Our study demonstrates a novel example of an activator role of ZEB1 for the epigenetic landscape in colorectal tumor cells.