Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease with poor prognosis. The IPF-conditioned matrix (IPF-CM) system enables the study of matrix–fibroblast interplay. While effective at slowing fibrosis, nintedanib has limitations and the mechanism is not fully elucidated. In the current work, we explored the underlying signaling pathways and characterized nintedanib involvement in the IPF-CM fibrotic process. Results were validated using IPF patient samples and bleomycin-treated animals with/without oral and inhaled nintedanib. IPF-derived primary human lung fibroblasts (HLFs) were cultured on Matrigel and then cleared using NH4OH, creating the IPF-CM. Normal HLF-CM served as control. RNA-sequencing, PCR and western-blots were performed. HIF1α targets were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in bleomycin-treated rats with/without nintedanib and in patient samples with IPF. HLFs cultured on IPF-CM showed over-expression of ‘HIF1α signaling pathway’ (KEGG, p < 0.0001), with emphasis on SERPINE1 (PAI-1), VEGFA and TIMP1. IPF patient samples showed high HIF1α staining, especially in established fibrous tissue. PAI-1 was overexpressed, mainly in alveolar macrophages. Nintedanib completely reduced HIF1α upregulation in the IPF-CM and rat-bleomycin models. IPF-HLFs alter the extracellular matrix, thus creating a matrix that further propagates an IPF-like phenotype in normal HLFs. This pro-fibrotic loop includes the HIF1α pathway, which can be blocked by nintedanib.
Background: This clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of inhaled pirfenidone solution in volunteers and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods: Forty-four adults in six cohorts consented to receive single doses of a 12.5 mg/mL pirfenidone solution or placebo to assess tolerability and pharmacokinetics. Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 (normal healthy volunteers [NHV]) (n ¼ 6 active; n ¼ 2 placebo in each cohort) received 25, 50, and 100 mg pirfenidone, respectively. Cohort 4 (NHV) (n ¼ 6 all active) received 100 mg of pirfenidone and underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to measure epithelial lining fluid (ELF) pirfenidone concentrations. Cohort 5 (prior or current smokers with greater than 20 packyear use) (n ¼ 6 active; n ¼ 2 placebo) and Cohort 6 (IPF patients) (n ¼ 6 all active) received 100 mg of pirfenidone. All treatments were administered with an Investigational eFlow Ò Nebulizer System (PARI Pharma GmbH). Serial measures of urine and plasma pirfenidone were collected during the 24-hour postdose in all subjects. Results: Administration time ranged from 1.4 to 2 min/mL. No clinically relevant adverse effects on respiratory rate, spirometry, or oxygenation were observed. Drug-related adverse events were predominantly cough, n ¼ 8/44 (one in IPF cohort), all mild, transient, and not dose limiting. Mean plasma pirfenidone Cmax levels in the 25, 50, 100 mg NHV, 100 mg smoker, and IPF cohorts were 202, 292, 802, 1370, 1016, and 1026 ng/mL, respectively. BAL cohort estimated ELF Cmax was 135.9-54.5 lg/mL. In the BAL and IPF cohorts, 24-hour urine excretion of pirfenidone and metabolites data suggests similar alveolar deposition. Conclusions: Aerosol pirfenidone was well tolerated in normal volunteers, smokers, and IPF patients. High ELF concentrations were achieved in NHV with a 100 mg nebulizer dose. The 100 mg nebulizer dose averaged a 15-fold lower systemic pirfenidone exposure than reported with oral administration of the licensed oral dose.
Biological complexity and the need for highly differentiated medicines means that drug discovery and development have become increasingly challenging and expensive. Thus, new paradigms for research and drug development need to be created that bring together a wide array of expertise. One potential solution is collaboration between bio-pharma and academic research centres. Two examples are discussed, one with a large pharma company (GlaxoSmithKline) and the other a small biotech (Genoa Pharmaceuticals). Patient advocacy organization can also have role in assisting in the creation of these partnerships by informing patients of ongoing research and clinical trials, and supporting the development of networks that can provide major benefit for both basic research and drug development. A major 'hurdle' for the creation of these relationships is the issue of intellectual property. Examples are provided of how this issue can be resolved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.