Background Oritavancin (ORI) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide indicated for the treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused or suspected to be caused by susceptible Gram-positive (GP) pathogens. Methods Data collected from a retrospective observational program (2014–2017), Clinical and Historic Registry and Orbactiv Medical Evaluation (CHROME), describe the utilization, outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) associated with ORI in 440 patients treated at 26 US sites for ABSSSI and other GP infections. Results Clinical success in evaluable patients receiving at least 1 dose of oritavancin was 88.1% (386/438). In a subgroup of patients who received ORI for skin and soft tissue infections (n = 401) and bacteremia (n = 7), clinical success was achieved in 89.0% and 100%, respectively. A cohort of 32 patients received 2–10 ORI doses separated by no more than 14 days for complicated GP infections. Clinical success was observed in 30 of 32 patients (93.8%), including 10 of 11 (90.9%) patients with bone and joint infections and 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients with osteomyelitis. In the safety evaluable population, the overall rate of AEs was 6.6%. Conclusions We describe results from a real-world program that includes the largest multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients who received at least 1 dose of ORI for the treatment of GP infections. This study confirms that ORI is an effective, well-tolerated antibiotic used in single and multiple doses for the treatment of ABSSSIs and complicated GP infections.

Background.The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oritavancin compared with vancomycin for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) who received treatment in the outpatient setting in the Phase 3 SOLO clinical trials.Methods.SOLO I and SOLO II were 2 identically designed comparative, multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single 1200-mg dose of intravenous (IV) oritavancin versus 7–10 days of twice-daily IV vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSI. Protocols were amended to allow enrolled patients to complete their entire course of antimicrobial therapy in an outpatient setting. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite endpoint (cessation of spread or reduction in size of the baseline lesion, absence of fever, and no rescue antibiotic at early clinical evaluation [ECE]) (48 to 72 hours). Key secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed clinical cure 7 to 14 days after end of treatment (posttherapy evaluation [PTE]) and 20% or greater reduction in lesion area at ECE. Safety was assessed until day 60.Results.Seven hundred ninety-two patients (oritavancin, 392; vancomycin, 400) received entire course of treatment in the outpatient setting. Efficacy response rates at ECE and PTE were similar (primary composite endpoint at ECE: 80.4% vs 77.5% for oritavancin and vancomycin, respectively) as was incidence of adverse events. Five patients (1.3%) who received oritavancin and 9 (2.3%) vancomycin patients were subsequently admitted to a hospital.Conclusions.Oritavancin provides a single-dose alternative to multidose vancomycin for treatment of ABSSSI in the outpatient setting.

No abstract

BackgroundOritavancin is a lipoglycopeptide used in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in adults. To characterize its use in patients in the postapproval setting, a patient registry was developed.MethodsData collected in an ongoing retrospective observational registry are used to evaluate the utilization, outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) associated with oritavancin for the treatment of infections presumed or confirmed to be caused by gram-positive (GP) bacteria in clinical practice.ResultsData for 112 patients from 8 sites were collected. All patients received a single 1200-mg dose of oritavancin mostly in an infusion center. Infection type included cellulitis (67.0%), cutaneous abscess (21.4%), and wound (4.5%). Most patients (72.3%) received 1 or more antimicrobial agents for the index GP infection within 28 days prior to oritavancin treatment. Of positive cultures obtained prior to oritavancin administration, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen (78.4%). A positive clinical response was observed in 92.8% of patients, and microbial eradication was observed in 90.0% of patients with post-therapy cultures. Within 28 days following oritavancin administration, 4 (3.6%) patients were hospitalized for failure of treatment of the index infection. Five (4.5%) patients experienced 1 or more possible drug-related AEs, which were consistent with types previously reported. There were no drug-related serious AEs reported.ConclusionsClinical and microbiologic outcomes and safety of single-dose oritavancin 1200 mg were similar in this older patient population with multiple comorbid conditions to those observed in the phase 3 SOLO trials.

The role of empirical and even directed antimicrobial management of patients hospitalized with SARS- CoV-2 infection is problematic; antibiotics are used frequently among these patients whether to treat confirmed or suspected co-infection or simply symptoms. In the rapidly changing clinical landscape of SARS- CoV-2 there is minimal guidance for selecting appropriate treatment versus non-antimicrobial treatment, and clinicians are pressed to make daily decisions under the stress of absence of data while watching patients deteriorate. We review current data and patterns of antimicrobial use and the potential approach for antimicrobial stewardship in the context of SARS- CoV-2.