Background The SARS-Cov-2 Omicron variant demonstrates rapid spread but with reduced disease severity. Studies evaluating the lung imaging findings of Omicron infection versus non-Omicron variants remain lacking. Purpose To compare Omicron and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 by their chest CT radiological pattern, biochemical parameters, clinical severity and hospital outcomes after adjusting for vaccination status. Materials and Methods Retrospective study of hospitalized adult patients rt-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 with CT pulmonary angiography performed within 7 days of admission between December 1, 2021 and January 14, 2022. Blinded radiological analysis with multiple readers including RSNA CT classification, chest CT severity score (CT-SS, range 0 least severe to 25 most severe) and CT imaging features including bronchial wall thickening. Results 106 patients (Delta n=66, Omicron n=40) were evaluated (mean age, 58 years ± 18, 58 men). In the Omicron group, 37% (15/40) of CT pulmonary angiograms were categorized as normal compared with 15% (10/66) in the Delta group (p=.016). Using a generalized linear model to control for confounding variables, including vaccination status, Omicron variant infection was associated with a CT-SS that was lower by 7.2 points compared to infection with Delta variant (β=-7.2, 95%CI: -9.9, -4.5; p <.001). Bronchial wall thickening was more common with Omicron than with the Delta variant (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95%CI: 1.01, 5.92, p=.04). Vaccination with a booster shot was associated with a protective effect on chest infection compared with the unvaccinated (CT-SS median 5 (IQR 0-11), CT-SS median 11 (IQR 7.5-14), respectively; p = .03). The Delta variant was associated with a higher odds ratio of severe disease (OR 4.6, 95%CI: 1.2, 26, p=.01) and critical care admission (OR 7.0, 95%CI: 1.5, 66, p=.004) than the Omicron variant. Conclusion The SARS-COV-2 Omicron variant was associated with fewer and less severe changes on chest CT compared with the Delta variant. Patients with Omicron had greater frequency of bronchial wall thickening but lower clinical severity and improved hospital outcomes than those with Delta.
Introduction Many studies have looked at global changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) following PAE; however, no studies have examined the breakdown between storage and voiding symptoms. We aimed to explore the extent to which PAE improves storage symptoms in relation to voiding symptoms. Method This single-center, prospective cohort study recruited consecutive patients undergoing PAE from June 2012 to June 2016. The IPSS breakdown was recorded pre-PAE, at 3 months and 12 months post-PAE. Planned statistical analysis included the paired t test. Results A total of 43 patients were recruited (mean age 64.72 ± 6.27, prostate volume 88.65 ± 37.23 cm 3 , IPSS 23.02 ± 5.84, QoL 4.98 ± 1.01, PSA 4.2 ± 2.8). Storage symptoms were more frequently the most severe symptom (58.1%). Voiding score (13.35-5.39, p \ 0.001) and storage score (9.67-5.08, p \ 0.001) both improved; however, voiding improved to a greater extent (1.9 vs. 1.5 mean per question, p = 0.023). PAE was most consistent when improving storage symptoms ('Urgency' improved in 86% patients, 'Frequency' and 'Nocturia' 77%). Conclusion Storage symptoms are a significant problem for patients with benign prostatic obstruction. PAE is an effective treatment for both storage and voiding symptoms. More research is needed to evaluate how this compares with surgical techniques.
A 44-year-old man presented with an enlarged painful lower anterior neck lump with elevated serum concentrations of free thyroxine (T4) and tri-iodothyronine (T3), alongside the presence of antithyroid peroxidase antibodies. Prior to presentation, the patient was demonstrating recovery from a SARS-CoV-2 infection that required sedation, intubation, and invasive ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) for 11 days. Ultrasound examination of the thyroid demonstrated features of De Quervain’s (subacute) thyroiditis. This corresponded to the clinical picture, and continuous thyroid function tests were arranged. Emerging evidence throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic describes the long-term sequelae of the infection, including developing atypical effects on the thyroid gland. This case report emphasises the association of painful subacute thyroiditis with post-viral infection and its manifestation during recovery from severe SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that follow-up thyroid function testing should be considered in patients discharged from the ICU who develop neck discomfort.
A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with recurrent severe headaches. Although initial computer tomography (CT) brain imaging was unremarkable, a later CT venogram demonstrated a small subarachnoid haemorrhage. Magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) brain imaging subsequently confirmed reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). In the acute setting, RCVS rarely falls into a differential diagnosis for headache presentations, as in this case. The radiological variability can make diagnosis of RCVS challenging. However, there are clinical consistencies that can aid physicians into accurately diagnosing RCVS. A thorough history, including a medication history, can help identify potential triggers of RCVS. As in this case, the combination of commonly used drugs, including antihistamines, provides a plausible trigger for RCVS. The direct vasoactive role of antihistamines is unclear, yet there is suggestion for its ability to potentiate the vasoactive action of other drugs. In this case we propose a causal relationship between the use of antihistamine and the development of RCVS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.