No abstract

Tyrannosaurids were the apex predators of Late Cretaceous Laurasia and their status as dominant carnivores has garnered considerable interest since their discovery, both in the popular and scientific realms. As a result, they are well studied and much is known of their anatomy, diversity, growth, and evolution. In contrast, little is known of the earliest stages of tyrannosaurid development. Tyrannosaurid eggs and embryos remain elusive, and juvenile specimens — although known — are rare. Perinatal tyrannosaurid bones and teeth from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of western North America provide the first window into this critical period of the life of a tyrannosaurid. An embryonic dentary (cf. Daspletosaurus) from the Two Medicine Formation of Montana, measuring just 3 cm long, already exhibits distinctive tyrannosaurine characters like a “chin” and a deep Meckelian groove, and reveals the earliest stages of tooth development. When considered together with a remarkably large embryonic ungual from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation of Alberta, minimum hatchling size of tyrannosaurids can be roughly estimated. A perinatal premaxillary tooth from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation likely pertains to Albertosaurus sarcophagus and it shows small denticles on the carinae. This tooth shows that the hallmark characters that distinguish tyrannosaurids from other theropods were present early in life and raises questions about the ontogenetic variability of serrations in premaxillary teeth. Sedimentary and taphonomic similarities in the sites that produced the embryonic bones provide clues to the nesting habits of tyrannosaurids and may help to refine the prospecting search image in the continued quest to discover baby tyrannosaurids.

No abstract

The taxonomic validity of the holotype and sole specimen of the pachycephalosaurid Gravitholus albertae (TMP 1972.027.0001) from the Belly River Group (Alberta, Canada), remains unresolved forty years after its first description. The diagnosis for this species is tenuous at best and extensive cranial fusion has prevented a thorough description and taxonomic referral of TMP 1972.027.0001. We used synchrotron µCT imaging to identify fused sutures and segment the individual elements that comprise TMP 1972.027.0001. This allowed for a detailed description of the specimen in a more thorough comparative framework with other known pachycephalosaurid specimens. Using new observations of contacts between cranial elements, the morphological distinction of TMP 1972.027.0001 from other Belly River Group pachycephalosaurids was tested with bivariate and multivariate morphometric analyses. TMP 1972.027.0001 is morphologically consistent as an end-stage semaphorant of Stegoceras validum. Furthermore, we find no taxonomically significant morphometric distinctions between Gravitholus albertae, Hanssuesia sternbergi, and Stegoceras validum, and propose the former two are synonymous with the later. Large Stegoceras validum frontoparietals show statistically significant dimorphism in the thickness of the frontonasal boss, which is not apparent amongst juvenile and subadult specimens. Pathologies consistent with intraspecific combat (“headbutting”) appear restricted to frontoparietal domes with proportionally taller frontonasal bosses, and suggests that the two morphs represent sexual dimorphs, rather than separate species. Foraminacephale brevis and Stegoceras validum are the only named pachycephalosaurids recognised in the Dinosaur Park Formation. The stratigraphic and temporal range of Stegoceras validum is extended into the underlying Oldman Formation. Pachycephalosaurid diversity in the Campanian is reduced as a result of these revised taxonomic hypotheses. A revised phylogenetic character matrix, recognising taxonomic synonymies and ontogenetically dependent character states results in a largely unresolved Pachycephalosauria.

No abstract