L»JL«^ L»'j^ii«i.ii.i«'.^.uiiMij^:*i*j«i«v«A^^ UNCLASSIFIED MCUWTV CUAf WCATWM OP TWIt PM 20. (Continued) Training 1s a necessary and expensive activity needed to maintain military readiness. The Defense Science Board has recommended that costeffectiveness evaluations of military training be performed to optimize the use of available training resources and to support Investments in new training programs, equipment and technologies. The Board found that data needed to develop and evaluate training programs are Inadequate; this perpetuates the weak position of training in competing for funds, and in demonstrating Its value. Our review of the cost analyses in well over 100 studies of defense training was consistent with the Board's finding. This cost element structure was developed with reference to a number of authoritative and widely-used cost guides Issued by and for the training and weapon systems communities of the Services and offices of the Secretary of Defense. It also incorporates many recommendations of reviewers Involved 1n related functions and activities. The general use of a comprehensive cost-element structure such as this would offer several advantages for evaluating the costs of Institutional training programs, courses, and devices.
This document is one of four reports on york performed by the Institute for Defense Analyses for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (FDserve Affairs) since August 1965 under Task Order T-N2-266, *Reserve Component Training Technology. While the task is concerned vith the reserve cmponents (Cs) of all the Services, our effort to date has been focused on the Army Guard and the Army Deserve. This first reporte ID Paper P-l971, (1) describes the methodology of our Investigation of Army KC training, (2) presents a statistical description of the environment for that t training, and (3) provides other information that we expect to be useful for our continuing look at the Army WeF. The second report. IM Paper P-1972, *Training State of a Group of Amy Combat Servio Support Units (M)W (1987), is an aesemat of the state of training of Guard and Deserve units that perform combat logistics functions, i.e., maintenance and movement of equipment, supplies, and personselt it is the only one of the four reo that is classified (confidential). An evaluation of tank gunnery devices is described in our third report, IDA Papor P-1973o 68imulation Trainers for Tank Gunnery (1967).• The fourth report, ZDM Nomorandmm Deport *-255, "Initial Aseesment of Mintenance Training of Army Reserve Components.e (1967), to a preliminary exmination af Army C maintenance training to "ientify area(s) for analysis.
Total .10.65 . in extract. 9.58 89.99 100.00 Humin . 1.48 13.90 15.81 removed by precipitation of : • xanthin bases. 0.464 4.36 4.84 histidin and arginin. 1.726 16.21 18.01 in solution for histidin. 0.454 4.27 4.74 after precipitation with phospho¬ tungstic acid. 0.358 3.36 3.73 in solution for arginin. 0.657 6.17 6.86 after precipitation with phospho¬ tungstic acid. 0.223 2.09 2.33 In solution for lysin. 2.83 26.55 29.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.