Although guidelines are inadequate to predict and prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, until further research is available, following one of the existing guidelines to monitor for this adverse effect is a practical solution.

Unfractionated heparin infusion therapy is often administered using a weight-based dosing strategy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. In the last several decades, the prevalence of obesity in the United States has increased significantly. The applicability of weight-based heparin dosing recommendations in the obese and morbidly obese population is uncertain, as limited data are available. We describe a 388-kg man who was started on an intravenous infusion of heparin according to hospital protocol for suspected pulmonary embolism. The patient was given a 5000-unit heparin bolus followed by an initial heparin infusion rate of 1500 units/hour, the maximum initial rate specified in the protocol. After additional infusion rate adjustments, a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was reached 55 hours later with a heparin infusion rate of 3650 units/hour. Due to concerns of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin therapy was discontinued, and fondaparinux 5 mg/day was started. However, heparin therapy was restarted 4 days later for persistent, refractory hypoxemia and recurrent concerns of possible pulmonary embolism. During this second course, a therapeutic aPTT was achieved with a heparin infusion rate of 3550 units/hour. The patient developed bloody pulmonary secretions (with a therapeutic aPTT), necessitating the discontinuation of the heparin infusion. The patient later died after developing pulseless electrical activity. Standard weight-based heparin dosing protocols that specify maximum doses for initial bolus and infusion rates can result in significant delays in time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation in the obese and morbidly obese patient. Despite limited data on heparin dosing in obesity, we recommend the use of a dosing weight to determine initial heparin dosing when treating venous thromboembolism in morbidly obese patients. It is reasonable to consider one of the following formulas: dosing weight = ideal body weight (IBW) + 0.3(actual body weight [ABW] - IBW), or dosing weight = IBW + 0.4(ABW - IBW).

rFVIIa may be considered to manage major refractory bleeding from newer parenteral anticoagulant agents when the benefit is thought to outweigh the thrombotic risk.

Purpose Reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by patients is essential for a comprehensive risk–benefit evaluation of drugs after marketing, but only few data are available regarding patient-centred web-based ADR reporting systems. Hence, we aimed to analyze ADRs reported by patients with a particular emphasis on novel drugs and serious ADRs not yet labelled in the respective summary of product characteristics (SPC). Methods All ADR reports received by a web-based, patient-centred platform (www.nebenwirkungen.de) between April 1, 2019, and September 1, 2020, were descriptively analyzed. ADRs and drugs were coded automatically according to MedDRA and ATC classification system. SPC labelling of reported ADRs for novel drugs marketed since 2015 was checked manually. Results In total, 13,515 patient reports including 29,529 ADRs were received during the study period (serious ADRs [SADRs] n = 1,318; 4.5%). Women were affected in more than two-thirds of ADR reports. The most common patient-reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness and headache, whereas arrhythmia, intestinal obstruction and erectile dysfunction were the most frequent SADRs. Ciprofloxacin, levothyroxine and venlafaxine were the compounds most frequently suspected for causing both ADRs and SADRs. Regarding novel compounds, 289 reports including 739 ADRs were received (mainly fatigue, headache and myalgia). Three hundred thirty-one (44.8%) out of those ADRs were not yet labelled in the respective SPC, whereof twelve were SADRs. Conclusion The majority of patient-reported ADRs were non-serious. However, a relevant number of non-labelled even serious ADRs was reported for novel compounds by patients. Despite well-known limitations of patient-reported ADRs, this web-based ADR reporting system contributes to the identification of new ADRs and thus can help to improve patients’ safety complementing other pharmacovigilance instruments.

No abstract