Background The outcomes of shoulder arthroplasties in younger patients (55 years or younger) are not as reliable compared with those of the general population. Greater risk of revision and higher complication rates in younger patients present direct costs to the healthcare system and indirect costs to the patient in terms of quality of life. Previous studies have suggested an increased demand for shoulder arthroplasties overall, but to our knowledge, the demand in younger patients has not been explored.
It is unclear whether short-term benefits from supplemental oxygen translate into improved quality of life in patients with severe COPD. In a 12 wk double-blind randomized crossover study, we assessed the effects of supplemental air and oxygen on exercise performance (step tests and 6 min walking distance [6MWD]) initially and after two 6 wk periods at home using exertional cylinder air or oxygen. We measured quality of life at baseline and after the two 6 wk domiciliary periods. The 26 patients (24 males) had a mean age of 73 +/- 6 yr; mean FEV1, 0.9 +/- 0.4 L; mean DLCO, 10.6 +/- 2.4 ml/min/mm Hg; mean resting PO2, 69 +/- 8.5 (range 58 to 82) mm Hg; mean PCO2, 41 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; and mean resting SaO2, 94 +/- 2.1 (mean +/- SD). Laboratory tests were performed breathing intranasal air or oxygen at 4 L/min, and measurements were made of SaO2 and Borg dysnea scores. Supplemental oxygen increased 6MWD and steps by small, statistically significant increments acutely at baseline and after 6 and 12 wk, without corresponding falls in Borg score. Degree of desaturation at baseline did not correlate with increase in 6MWD or steps achieved at baseline or at 6 or 12 wk, nor with the domiciliary gas used. There was no difference in 6MWD or steps achieved while breathing supplemental oxygen after 6 wk of domiciliary oxygen compared with domiciliary air. Small improvements in quality of life indices were found after domiciliary oxygen, and mastery also improved after domiciliary air. There were no differences in quality of life, however, when domiciliary oxygen was compared with domiciliary air. Although oxygen supplementation induced small acute increments in laboratory exercise performance, such improvements had little impact on the patients' daily lives.
Posterior glenoid bone loss often is seen in association with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Many different techniques have been proposed to account for this bone loss during total shoulder arthroplasty, the most popular being eccentric anterior reaming. However, the amount of correction that can be achieved has not been been well quantified. The purpose of this study was to define the amount of eccentric posterior glenoid wear that can be corrected by anterior glenoid reaming. Eight cadaveric scapulae were studied. Simulations of posterior glenoid wear in 5 degrees increments were performed on each scapula. The specimens were then eccentrically reamed to correct the deformity. Anteroposterior width, superior-inferior height, and the best-fit pegged glenoid prosthesis size were measured. Anterior reaming to correct a 10 degrees posterior defect resulted in a decrease in anteroposterior glenoid diameter from 26.7+/-2.5 mm to 23.8+/-3.1 mm (P=.006). In 4 of 8 specimens, placing a glenoid prosthesis was not possible after correcting a 15 degrees deformity because of inadequate bony support (N=2), peg penetration (N=1) or both (N=1). A 20 degrees deformity was correctable in 2 of 8 specimens and only after downsizing the glenoid component. Anterior glenoid reaming to correct eccentric posterior wear of >10 degrees results in significant narrowing of the anteroposterior glenoid width. A 15 degrees deformity has only a 50% chance of successful correction by anterior, eccentric reaming. Orthopedic surgeons need to be cognizant of this in their preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.