Summary Background 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03471494 . Findings Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit.

McKittrick-Wheelock syndrome is a rare and life-threatening disease characterized by the triad of (1) chronic mucous diarrhea, (2) renal function impairment with hydroelectrolyte imbalance, and (3) a giant colorectal tumor. Often, the tumor is a rectal adenoma. With the mortality being certain, if left untreated, it is important to raise awareness on the presentation, diagnosis, and management of this disease entity. Here, we presented 3 cases of McKittrick-Wheelock syndrome that were successfully managed with surgical resection at the Philippine General Hospital from August 2018 to May 2019. Resolution of their symptoms, reversal of their renal impairment, and correction of their electrolyte depletion were noted after removal of the tumor with a sphincter-saving operation.

No abstract

A 61-year-old woman developed neorectal prolapse after laparoscopic low anterior resection, total mesorectal excision with partial intersphincteric resection and handsewn coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. She presented with a 3 cm full thickness reducible prolapse, with associated anal pain and bleeding. A perineal stapled prolapse resection was performed to address the rectal prolapse, with satisfactory results.

Purpose: We determined the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) for fistulain-ano at the Philippine General Hospital.Methods: Twenty consecutive adult patients who underwent the VAAFT procedure from 2016–2018 were included in this investigation. Information detailing baseline demographic and clinical data, fistula type and classification, and previous surgeries were retrieved from in-hospital and operative records. Operative time, identification of the internal opening, method of internal opening closure, and occurrence of immediate postoperative complications were determined. The status of the fistula was assessed at one month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively based on outpatient follow-up records. The primary outcomes were healing rate and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, postoperative complications, and incontinence using the Wexner score.Results: Eighteen patients (90%) had a preoperative diagnosis of complex fistula, and 13 patients (65%) had undergone a previous fistula surgery. Primary healing rate was 55% at 1 month, 63.16% at 3 months, and 78.95% at 6 months postoperatively. Eighteen patients (94.74%) maintained continence (Wexner score = 0) at 6 months.Conclusion: Our study results suggest that VAAFT is a safe, minimally invasive technique for treatment of anal fistula and can preserve anal sphincter function. The technique has an acceptable healing rate with minimal complications.

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has strained healthcare resources worldwide. Despite the high number of cases, cancer management should remain one of the priorities of healthcare, as any delay would potentially cause disease progression.Methods: This was an observational study that included nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients managed at the Philippine General Hospital from March 16 to May 31, 2020, coinciding with the lockdown. The treatment received and their outcomes were investigated.Results: Of the 52 patients included, the majority were female (57.7%), belonging to the age group of 50 to 69 years (53.8%), and residing outside the capital (59.6%). On follow-up, 23.1% had no disease progression, 17.3% had local progression, 28.8% had metastatic progression, 19.2% have died, and 11.5% were lost to follow up. The initial plan for 47.6% patients was changed. Of the 21 patients with nonmetastatic disease, 2 underwent outright resection. The remaining 19 required neoadjuvant therapy. Eight have completed their neoadjuvant treatment, 8 are undergoing treatment, 2 had their treatment interrupted, and 1 has yet to begin treatment. Among the 9 patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy, only 1 was able to undergo resection on time. The rest were delayed, with a median time of 4 months. One has repeatedly failed to arrive for her surgery due to public transport limitations. There was 1 adjuvant chemotherapy-related mortality.Conclusion: Delays in cancer management resulted in disease progression in several patients. Alternative neoadjuvant treatment options should be considered while taking into account oncologic outcomes, acceptable toxicity, and limitation of potential COVID-19 exposure.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate surgical outcomes (i.e. length of stay (LOS), 30-day morbidity, mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates) with the use of the ERAS pathway, and determine its association with the rate of compliance to the different ERAS components. Methodology: This was a prospective cohort of patients, who underwent the following elective procedures: stoma reversal (SR), colon resection (CR), and rectal resection (RR). The primary endpoint was to determine the association of compliance to an ERAS pathway and surgical outcomes. These were then retrospectively compared to outcomes prior to the implementation of ERAS. Results: A total of 267 patients were included in the study. The overall compliance to the ERAS component was 92% (SR:91.75%, CR:93.06%, RR:90.65%). There was an associated decrease in morbidity rates across all types of surgery, as compliance to ERAS increased. The average total LOS decreased in all groups but was only found to have statistical significance in SR (12.06 ± 6.67 vs 10.02 ± 5.43 days; p=0.002) and RR (19.85 ± 11.38 vs 16.85 ± 10.45 days; p=0.04) groups. Decreased postoperative LOS was noted in all groups. Morbidity rates were significantly higher after ERAS implementation, but reoperation and mortality rates were found to be similar. Conclusion: Increased compliance to ERAS protocol is associated with a decrease in morbidity across all surgery types. The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreased mean hospital LOS, without any increase in major surgical complications. Having your own hospital ERAS pathway improves documentation and accuracy of reporting surgical complications.

BACKGROUND: The Philippines ranks 10th in tuberculosis prevalence worldwide. Aside from pulmonary tuberculosis, GI tuberculosis remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in endemic areas. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the clinicopathologic profile and surgical outcomes of patients with GI tuberculosis. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. SETTING: Department of Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines. PATIENTS: This study included all newly diagnosed cases of GI tuberculosis from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical response to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 241 confirmed new cases were managed during an 11-year period. Of these, 208 patients (86.30%) underwent outright surgery, whereas the remaining patients (13.69%) received antituberculous therapy. Fifteen medically managed patients eventually required surgery, bringing the total surgically managed patients to 223. The patients’ age ranged from 19 to 72 years, with a 1.9:1 male to female ratio. The most common complaint was abdominal pain. Intestinal obstruction was the most common indication for surgery. A right hemicolectomy was the most often performed procedure, with the ileocecal area as the most frequently involved segment. The most common histopathologic findings were epithelioid granuloma and caseation necrosis. Postoperative length of stay ranged from 0 to 59 days (mean, 7 days). Morbidity rate was 5.38% and mortality rate was 3.14%. Four deaths were operative and resulted from septic shock because of hollow viscus perforation. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited to histopathologic basis for diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The recommended initial therapy for all forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is a 6-month regimen of antituberculous therapy unless the organisms are known or suspected to be resistant to first-line drugs. Surgery is reserved for complications of intra-abdominal tuberculosis: obstruction, perforation, or severe bleeding. Timely surgical intervention, coupled with medical management led to the best outcomes for these patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C56. MANEJO QUIRÚRGICO DE PACIENTES CON TUBERCULOSIS GASTROINTESTINAL ANTECEDENTES: Las Filipinas ocupa el décimo lugar en prevalencia de tuberculosis en todo el mundo. Aparte de la tuberculosis pulmonar, la tuberculosis gastrointestinal sigue siendo una causa importante de morbilidad y mortalidad, especialmente en las zonas endémicas. OBJETIVO: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir el perfil clinicopatológico y los resultados quirúrgicos de pacientes con tuberculosis gastrointestinal. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. AJUSTE: Departamento de Cirugía del Hospital General de Filipinas, Manila, Filipinas. PACIENTES: Todos los casos de tuberculosis gastrointestinal recién diagnosticados desde el 1 de Enero del 2009 hasta el 31 de Diciembre del 2019. MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL: Respuesta clínica a la cirugía. RESULTADOS: Se manejaron un total de 24...