Carbon dioxide insufflation during POEM produces systemic CO uptake and increased intra-abdominal pressure. Changes in cardiorespiratory parameters include increased p, etCO, MAP, and HR. Hyperventilation and PND help mitigate some of these changes. Subcutaneous emphysema is common and may delay extubation and prolong PACU stay.

Background Children suffering from mucopolysaccharidoses (subtypes I, II, III, IV, VI, and VII) or mucolipidoses often require anesthesia, but are at high risk for perioperative adverse events. However, the impact of the disease subtype and the standard of care for airway management are still unclear. Aims This study aimed to assess independent risk factors for perioperative adverse events in individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses/mucolipidoses and to analyze the interaction with the primary airway technique implemented. Methods This retrospective study included individuals with mucopolysaccharidoses/mucolipidoses who underwent anesthesia at two high‐volume centers from 2002 to 2016. The data were analyzed in a multivariate hierarchical model, accounting for repeated anesthesia procedures within the same patient and for multiple events within a single anesthesia. Results Of 141 identified inpatients, 67 (63 mucopolysaccharidoses and 4 mucolipidoses) underwent 269 anesthesia procedures (study cases) for 353 surgical or diagnostic interventions. At least one perioperative adverse event occurred in 25.6% of the cases. The risk for perioperative adverse events was higher in mucopolysaccharidoses type I (OR 8.0 [1.5‐42.7]; P = .014) or type II (OR 8.8 [1.3‐58.6]; P = .025) than in type III. Fiberoptic intubation through a supraglottic airway was associated with the lowest risk for perioperative adverse events and lowest conversion rate. Direct laryngoscopy was associated with a significantly higher risk for airway management problems than indirect techniques (estimated event rates 47.8% vs 10.1%, OR 24.05 [5.20‐111.24]; P < .001). The risk for respiratory adverse events was significantly higher for supraglottic airway (22.6%; OR 31.53 [2.79‐355.88]; P = .001) and direct laryngoscopy (14.8%; OR 14.70 [1.32‐163.44]; P = .029) than for fiberoptic intubation through a supraglottic airway (2.1%). Conclusions The disease subtype and primary airway technique were the most important independent risk factors for perioperative adverse events. Our findings indicate that in MPS/ML children with predicted difficult airway indirect techniques should be favored for the first tracheal intubation attempt.

Since amitriptyline inhibited Kv1.1 and Kv7.2/7.3 channels only at toxicologically relevant plasma concentrations, our results suggest a role for these channels in the neuroexcitatory side effects of amitriptyline. As the inhibitory effects of amitriptyline were reversed by retigabine, a combination of amitriptyline and retigabine could be of additional benefit in the therapy of neuropathic pain.

The interaction of bupivacaine with human TREK-1 channels was studied with the patch-clamp technique. Bupivacaine inhibited TREK-1 channels and depolarized the membrane potential of cells expressing TREK-1 channels in a concentration-dependent and reversible manner. Both effects may contribute to conductance block caused by bupivacaine.

No abstract

The effects of the antiarrhythmic drug propafenone at Kv2.1 channels were studied with wild-type and mutated channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Propafenone decreased the Kv2.1 currents in a time-and voltage-dependent manner (decrease of the time constants of current rise, increase of block with the duration of voltage steps starting from a block of less than 19%, increase of block with the amplitude of depolarization yielding a fractional electrical distance ␦ of 0.11 to 0.16). Block of Kv2.1 appeared with application to the intracellular, but not the extracellular, side of membrane patches. In mutagenesis experiments, all parts of the Kv2.1 channel were successively exchanged with those of the Kv1.2 channel, which is much more sensitive to propafenone. The intracellular amino and carboxyl terminus and the intracellular linker S4-S5 reduced the blocking effect of propafenone, whereas the linker S5-S6, as well as the segment S6 of the Kv1.2 channel, abolished it to the value of the Kv1.2 channel. In the linker S5-S6, this effect could be narrowed down to two groups of amino acids (groups 372 to 374 and 383 to 384), which also affected the sensitivity to tetraethylammonium. In segment S6, several amino acids in the intracellularly directed part of the helix significantly reduced propafenone sensitivity. The results suggest that propafenone blocks the Kv2.1 channel in the open state from the intracellular side by entering the inner vestibule of the channel. These results are consistent with a direct interaction of propafenone with the lower part of the pore helix and/or residues of segment S6.

No abstract

BackgroundTracheal intubation is commonly performed after direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh laryngoscopes (MacL), but visualization of the larynx may be inadequate. The VieScope (VSC) as a new type of laryngoscope consisting of a straight, shielded, illuminated tube used to perform intubation via a bougie was investigated in this prospective randomized trial in patients without expected difficult airways.MethodsWith ethics approval, 2 × 29 patients for elective surgery were randomized 1:1 to intubation with VSC or MacL. Endpoints were first attempt success rates (FAS), Percentage of Glottis Opening Scale (POGO), time to intubation (TTI), and difficulty ratings on visual analog scales (0–100, lower values better). Data are given as mean ± standard deviation.ResultsThe FAS was 83 ± 38% for VSC and 86 ± 34% for MacL (P = 0.723). For VSC, POGO was 86 ± 17% and for MacL 68 ± 30% (P = 0.007). TTI for VSC was 93 ± 67s vs. 38 ± 17 for MacL (P &lt; 0.001). Difficulty of intubation was rated 23 ± 22 for VSC vs. 18 ± 22 for MacL (P = 0.422), viewing conditions 12 ± 15 vs. 24 ± 25 (P = 0.031), and difficulty of tube placement was rated 27 ± 30 vs. 7 ± 8 (P = 0.001).ConclusionNo difference in FAS was detected between VSC and MacL. Visualization of the larynx was superior using the VSC, while TTI was prolonged and tube placement via bougie was more challenging. The VSC could be an alternative to MacL in patients with difficult laryngoscopy, but this should be investigated further in patients with expected difficult airways.