With regard to high ISH in treated Slovene hypertensive patients, quality of ISH control may not be optimal and should be improved. On the other hand, the adequate arterial hypertension (AH) control (systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg) was achieved in 55.6 % of patients. Our observations may have useful therapeutic implications in the management of AH, particularly ISH in the elderly.
Results also revealed that a greater proportion of the patients in the "lack of aware group" have INR values that are beyond the therapeutic range. Of the total of 7 Bleeding events reported by patients in this study, 6 were reported by patients who belonged to the lack of aware group. ConClusions: Our study demonstrates that ignorance regarding the significance of INR has impact on OAT. Patient education in conjunction with on-site INR testing by the pharmacist will both save lives and improve therapeutic outcome.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Edema is a common manifestation of proteinuric kidney diseases, but there is no consensus approach for reliably evaluating edema. The objective of this study was to develop an edema clinician-reported outcome measure for use in patients with nephrotic syndrome. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A literature review was conducted to assess existing clinician-rated measures of edema. Clinical experts were recruited from internal medicine, nephrology, and pediatric nephrology practices to participate in concept elicitation using semi-structured interviews and cognitive debriefing. Qualitative analysis methods were used to collate expert input and inform measurement development. In addition, training and assessment modules were developed using an iterative process that also utilized expert input and cognitive debriefing to ensure interrater reliability. <b><i>Results:</i></b> While several clinician-rated measures of edema have been proposed, our literature review did not identify any studies to support the reliability or validity of these measures. Fourteen clinician experts participated in the concept elicitation interviews, and twelve participated in cognitive debriefing. A clinician-reported outcome measure for edema was developed. The measure assesses edema severity in multiple individual body parts. An online training module and assessment tool were generated and refined using additional clinician input and investigative team expertise. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Edema ClinRO (V1) measure is developed specifically to measure edema in nephrotic syndrome. The tool assesses edema across multiple body parts, and it includes a training module to ensure standardized administration across raters. Future examination of this measure is ongoing to establish its reliability and validity.
We reviewed potentially clinically significant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) using Stockley’s Drug Interactions books and two online DDI databases. We identified >10 such DDIs and described their mechanisms, clinical evidence and importance, as well as their management. Most DDIs with ACEIs were pharmacodynamic; only a few were pharmacokinetic. Most DDIs with ACEIs involved drugs that can lead to excessive reduction of blood pressure, hyperkalemia and impaired renal function. There is some evidence linking ACEIs with the induction of lithium toxicity. Severe hypersensitivity reactions may occur in patients treated with ACEIs with concomitant use of allopurinol or parenteral applications of iron. ACEIs should be combined carefully with hepatotoxic drugs due to their own potential hepatotoxic effects. The prevalence of adverse drug reactions due to DDIs might be high because they are prescribed frequently. Fortunately, most of such DDIs can be managed by clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients or by dosage adjustments of concomitantly used drugs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.