No abstract

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory disease. Evolving disease models link changes in epidermal growth and differentiation to Th2/Th22 cytokine activation. However, these models have not been tested by in-vivo suppression of T-cell cytokines. CsA is an immune-suppressant highly effective for severe disease, but its mechanism in AD skin lesions has not been studied. Objective To establish the ability of a systemic immune-suppressant to modulate immune and epidermal alterations that form the pathogenic disease phenotype, and to correlate changes with clinical improvement. Methods CsA effects on AD skin pathology were evaluated using geneexpression and immunohistochemistry studies in baseline, week 2 and 12 lesional and non-lesional biopsies from 19 patients treated with 5 mg/kg/d CsA for 12 weeks. Results After 2 and 12 weeks of treatment, we observed significant reductions of 51% and 72%, respectively, in Scoring of AD/SCORAD. Clinical improvements were associated with significant gene expression changes in lesional but also non-lesional skin, particularly reductions of Th2-, Th22-, and some Th17-related molecules (i.e IL-13, IL-22, CCL17, S100As, elafin/PI3), and modulation of epidermal hyperplasia and differentiation measures. Conclusions This is the first study that establishes a relationship between cytokine activation and molecular epidermal alterations as well as correlations between disease biomarkers in the skin and clinical improvement. The reversal of the molecular phenotype with CsA and the associated biomarkers can serve as a reference for the successful modulation of tissue inflammation with specific immune-antagonists in future studies, contributing to the understanding of the specific cytokines involved in epidermal pathology.

Background The molecular signature of atopic dermatitis/AD lesions is associated with Th2 and Th22 activation, and epidermal alterations. However, the epidermal and dermal AD transcriptomes and their respective contributions to abnormalities in respective immune and barrier phenotypes are unknown. Objective To establish the genomic profile of the epidermal and dermal compartments of lesional/LS and non-lesional/NL AD, as compared with normal skin. Methods Laser capture micro-dissection/LCM was performed to separate epidermis and dermis of LS and NL skin from AD patients and normal skin from healthy volunteers followed by gene expression (microarrays and RT-PCR) and immunostaining studies. Results Our study identified novel immune and barrier genes, including the IL-34 cytokine and claudins 4 and 8, and showed increased detection of key AD genes usually undetectable on arrays (i.e. IL-22, TSLP, CCL22, and CCL26). Overall, the combined epidermal and dermal transcriptomes enlarged the AD transcriptome adding 674 up-regulated and 405 down-regulated differentially expressed genes between LS and NL skin to the AD transcriptome. We were also able to localize individual transcripts as primarily epidermal (DEFB4A) or dermal (IL-22, CTLA4, and CCR7), and link their expressions to possible cellular sources. Conclusions This is the first report that establishes robust epidermal and dermal genomic signatures of LS, NL AD and normal/N skin, as compared with whole tissues. These data establish the utility of LCM to separate different compartments and cellular subsets in AD, allowing localization of key barrier or immune molecules, and enable detection of gene products usually not detected on arrays.

No abstract

No abstract

Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity rates differ between different metastatic sites and the primary tumor. Understanding PD-L1 expression characteristics could guide biopsy procedures and motivate research to better understand site-specific differences in the tumor microenvironment. The purpose of this study was to compare PD-L1 positivity on immune cells and tumor cells in primary and metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors. Retrospective study utilizing the PD-L1 database of Foundation Medicine containing the SP142 companion diagnostic immunohistochemistry assay (SP142 CDx) and Food and Drug Administration guidelines for scoring. 340 TNBC cases (179 primary tumors and 161 unmatched metastatic lesions) were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were PD-L1 positivity rates in immune cells and tumor cells. χ2 test was used for comparisons. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for correlations. More primary tumors were positive for PD-L1 expression on immune cells than metastatic lesions (114 (63.7%) vs 68 (42.2%), p<0.0001). This was driven by the lower PD-L1 positivity rates in skin (23.8%, 95% CI: 8.22% to 47.2%), liver (17.4%, 95% CI: 5.00% to 38.8%) and bone (16.7%, 95% CI: 2.10% to 48.4%) metastases. Lung (68.8%, 95% CI: 41.3% to 90.0%), soft tissues (65.2%, 95% CI: 42.7% to 83.6%) and lymph nodes (51.1%, 95% CI: 35.8% to 66.3%) had PD-L1 % positivity rates similar to primary tumors. PD-L1 expression was rare on tumor cells in both the breast and metastatic sites (8.3% vs 4.3%, p=0.13). The rate of PD-L1 positivity varies by metastatic location with substantially lower positivity rates in liver, skin and bone metastases compared with primary breast lesions or lung, soft tissue or lymph node metastases. This difference in PD-L1 positivity rates between primary tumors and different metastatic sites should inform physicians when choosing sites to biopsy and suggests a difference in the immune microenvironment across metastatic sites.

No abstract

The prevalence of psoriasis is estimated to be 2.2% in the United States, and 6-39% of patients with psoriasis also develop psoriatic arthritis. New advances have been made in developing treatment options. A new human tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody, golimumab, has been shown to significantly improve symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. In addition, clinical trials of certolizumab pegol, a PEGylated Fab' fragment of an anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody, show promising results for treating rheumatoid arthritis and suggest that it may be applicable for treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the future. New biologic therapies also include antibodies to interleukin-12 and interleukin-23. Phase II studies suggest that ustekinumab is effective in alleviating symptoms of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, longer studies with radiographic evaluation will be required before their impact on joint destruction can be assessed.