Рабочие группы esC: Сердечно-сосудистая фармакотерапия, Сердечно-сосу-дистая хирургия, Врожденные пороки сердца у взрослых, Легочное крово-обращение и правожелудочковая функция, Клапанная болезнь сердца.Содержание данных рекомендаций, подготовленных Европейским Общест-вом Кардиологов (european society of Cardiology, esC) и Европейским Общест-вом Пульмонологов (european respiratory society, ers), опубликовано исклю-чительно для использования в личных и образовательных целях. Не допуска-ется коммерческое использование содержания рекомендаций. Рекомендации esC не могут быть переведены на другие языки либо воспроизведены, полно-стью или частично, без письменного согласия esC. Для получения данного согласия письменная заявка должна быть направлена в Oxford University Press -организацию, издающую european Heart Journal и официально упол-номоченную esC, рассматривать подобные заявки.Отказ от ответственности. Рекомендации esC/ers отражают взгляды esC/ ers и основаны на тщательном анализе научных данных, доступных во время подготовки данных рекомендаций. Медицинским работникам следует придер-живаться данных рекомендаций в процессе принятия клинических решений. В то же время, рекомендации не могут заменить личную ответственность медицинских работников при принятии клинических решений с учетом инди-видуальных особенностей и предпочтений пациентов и, при необходимости, предпочтений их опекунов и попечителей. Медицинские работники также несут ответственность в отношении дополнительной проверки всех надлежа-щих требований и правил перед назначением лекарственных средств и использованием медицинского оборудования. Ключевые слова: рекомендации, легочная гипертензия, легочная артериаль-ная гипертензия, хроническая тромбоэмболическая легочная гипертензия, врожденные пороки сердца, системные заболевания соединительной ткани, сердечная недостаточность, дыхательная недостаточность, антагонисты рецепторов эндотелина, ингибиторы фосфодиэстеразы 5 типа, аналоги про-стациклина, заболевания легких, заболевания левых камер сердца.
@ERSpublicationsThe risk stratification strategy proposed by the current European PH guidelines allows accurate survival prediction http://ow.ly/KsWk30c46nK ABSTRACT The 2015 European pulmonary hypertension (PH) guidelines propose a risk stratification strategy for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Low-, intermediate-and high-risk strata are defined by estimated 1-year mortality risks of <5%, 5-10% and >10%, respectively. This risk assessment strategy awaits validation.We analysed data from patients with newly diagnosed PAH enrolled into COMPERA (Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension), a European-based PH registry. An abbreviated version of the risk assessment strategy proposed by the European PH guidelines was applied, using the following variables: World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walking distance, brain natriuretic peptide or its N-terminal fragment, right atrial pressure, cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation.Data from 1588 patients were analysed. Mortality rates were significantly different between the three risk strata ( p<0.001 for all comparisons). In the entire patient population, the observed mortality rates 1 year after diagnosis were 2.8% in the low-risk cohort (n=196), 9.9% in the intermediate-risk cohort (n=1116) and 21.2% in the high-risk cohort (n=276). In addition, the risk assessment strategy proved valid at follow-up and in major PAH subgroups.An abbreviated version of the risk assessment strategy proposed by the current European PH guidelines provides accurate mortality estimates in patients with PAH.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism, either symptomatic or not. The occlusion of proximal pulmonary arteries by fibrotic intravascular material, in combination with a secondary microvasculopathy of vessels less than 500 µm, leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and progressive right heart failure. The mechanism responsible for the transformation of red clots into fibrotic material remnants has not yet been elucidated. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, the diagnosis is suspected when a ventilation/perfusion lung scan shows mismatched perfusion defects and confirmed by right heart catheterisation and vascular imaging. Today, in addition to lifelong anticoagulation, treatment modalities include surgery, angioplasty and medical treatment according to the localisation and characteristics of the lesions.This Statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning diagnosis and management of CTEPH. It covers the definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, follow up after acute pulmonary embolism, pathophysiology, treatment by pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, drugs and their combination, rehabilitation and new lines of research in CTEPH.It represents the first collaboration of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), the International CTEPH Association (ICA) and the European Reference Network (ERN)-Lung in the pulmonary hypertension domain. The Statement summarises current knowledge but does not make formal recommendations for clinical practice.
Combination therapy may improve outcome in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).PAH patients were treated according to a goal-oriented therapeutic strategy. Patients who did not reach the treatment goals with monotherapy received combination treatment according to a predefined strategy, including bosentan, sildenafil and inhaled iloprost. Intravenous iloprost and lung transplantation were reserved for treatment failures. End points were overall survival, transplantation-free survival, and survival free from transplantation and intravenous prostanoid treatment.Between January 2002 and December 2004, 123 consecutive patients with PAH were treated according to the novel approach. Survival at 1, 2 and 3 yrs was 93.0, 83.1 and 79.9%, respectively, which was significantly better than the survival of a historical control group, as well as the expected survival. Compared to the historical control group, the use of combination treatment also significantly improved the combined end point of death, lung transplantation and need for intravenous iloprost treatment.In conclusion, a therapeutic approach utilising combinations of bosentan, sildenafil and inhaled iloprost in conjunction with a goal-oriented treatment strategy provides acceptable long-term results in patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, and reduces the need for intravenous prostaglandin treatment and lung transplantation.
Addition of inhaled iloprost to bosentan may have beneficial effects in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). A multicentre, open, randomised, controlled trial was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of inhaled iloprost in patients with IPAH who had already been treated with bosentan.The trial was terminated early after a futility analysis predicted failure with respect to the predetermined sample size. At that time, 40 patients were randomised to receive either bosentan alone (control group) or bosentan plus inhaled iloprost (combination group) for a 12-week period.The primary end-point, change in 6-min walking distance, was not met (mean changes +1 m and -9 m in the control and combination group, respectively). These results may have been skewed by three outliers in the iloprost group who presented with severe clinical worsening. None of the secondary end-points including functional class, peak oxygen uptake, and time to clinical worsening differed significantly between groups.The current study failed to show a positive effect of adding inhaled iloprost to bosentan in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Further studies involving larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to determine the efficacy of adding inhaled iloprost to bosentan in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.