The is combined with 8-bromoadenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-Br-cAMP), MMTV-CAT is induced to levels approaching that stimulated by R5020 alone. Also, RU486 in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP is only partially effective in antagonizing R5020 action. The agonist activity exhibited under these conditions appears to be due to RU486 acting through hPR as evidenced by the fact that 8-Br-cAMP alone has no effect on MMTV-CAT, whereas induction by the combination of 8-BrcAMP and RU486 is dose responsive to RU486 in a saturable manner and can be inhibited by the type I antiprogestin (prevents hPR-DNA binding) ZK98299, which does not exhibit positive functional cooperation with cAMP. Acquisition of agonist activity in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP also extends to the type II antiprogestin (permits hPR-DNA binding) ZK112993. Since RU486 is also a type II antagonist, these results suggest that detection of functional synergism between cAMP and antiprogestins may require binding of the hPRantagonist complex to DNA. We propose that cross-talk between second messenger and steroid receptor signal transduction pathways may be one mechanism for resistance to steroid antagonists that frequently develops in breast cancer.

Prostate cancer cells derived from transgenic mice with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (TRAMP cells) were treated with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin. This caused inactivation of the small GTPase RhoA, actin stress ®ber disassembly, cell rounding, growth arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, cell detachment and apoptosis. Addition of geranylgeraniol (GGOL) in the presence of lovastatin, to stimulate protein geranylgeranylation, prevented lovastatin's e ects. That is, RhoA was activated, actin stress ®bers were assembled, the cells assumed a¯at morphology and cell growth resumed. The following observations support an essential role for RhoA in TRAMP cell growth: (1) TRAMP cells expressing dominant-negative RhoA (T19N) mutant protein displayed few actin stress ®bers and grew at a slower rate than controls (35 h doubling time for cells expressing RhoA (T19N) vs 20 h for untransfected cells); (2) TRAMP cells expressing constitutively active RhoA (Q63L) mutant protein displayed a contractile phenotype and grew faster than controls (13 h doubling time). Interestingly, addition of farnesol (FOL) with lovastatin, to stimulate protein farnesylation, prevented lovastatin-induced cell rounding, cell detachment and apoptosis, and stimulated cell spreading to a spindle shaped morphology. However, RhoA remained inactive and growth arrest persisted. The morphological e ects of FOL addition were prevented in TRAMP cells expressing dominant-negative H-Ras (T17N) mutant protein. Thus, it appears that H-Ras is capable of inducing cell spreading, but incapable of supporting cell proliferation, in the absence of geranylgeranylated proteins like RhoA.

The biologic effects and mechanisms by which bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) function in breast cancer cells are not well defined. A member of this family of growth and differentiation factors, BMP-2, inhibited both basal and estradiol-induced growth of MCF-7 breast tumor cells in culture. Flow cytometric analysis showed that in the presence of BMP-2, 62% and 45% of estradiol-stimulated MCF-7 cells progressed to S-phase at 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Estradiol mediates growth of human breast cancer cells by stimulating cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). BMP-2 significantly increased the level of the cyclin kinase inhibitor, p21, which in turn associated with and inactivated cyclin D1. BMP-2 inhibited estradiol-induced cyclin D1-associated kinase activity. Also estradiol-induced CDK2 activity was inhibited by BMP-2. This inhibition of CDK activity resulted in hypophosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein thus keeping it in its active form. These data provide the first evidence by which BMP-2 inhibits estradiol-induced proliferation of human breast cancer cells.

No abstract

RU486 is a glucocorticoid and progesterone antagonist. In glucocorticoid-responsive fibroblasts, it mediates little or no induction of a truncated, hormone-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter; moreover, it abrogates the induction mediated by the glucocorticoid agonist, dexamethasone. However, when the fibroblasts are treated with activators of protein kinase A, 8-Br-cAMP or forskolin, along with RU486, the steroid now acts as a partial agonist, capable of mediating an induction of hormone-responsive reporter genes. In addition, the ability of RU486 to block the action of the glucocorticoid agonist, dexamethasone, is compromised by concomitant treatment with 8-Br-cAMP. Activators of protein kinase C fail to elicit these phenomena. Induction of gene expression in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP is dependent on the dose of RU486 over a range consistent with a glucocorticoid receptor-mediated mechanism. An antagonist, ZK98 299, which unlike RU486 is not thought to permit receptor binding to DNA, is not activated by 8-Br-cAMP. The elicitation of RU486 agonist activity cannot be attributed solely to idiosyncrasies of the cell line or the promoter. Similar phenomena are observed in another glucocorticoid-responsive fibroblast line. Furthermore, RU486 can induce a minimal promoter bearing two copies of a synthetic receptor target site. However, we have identified at least one promoter toward which RU486 still behaves as an antagonist despite 8-Br-cAMP treatment. These observations suggest that the unmasking of latent agonist activity in a type II antagonist is not an isolated phenomenon and may, therefore, be seen with other receptors and antagonists. The finding that modulation of cellular signal transduction pathways can unmask agonist activity in an otherwise effective steroid antagonist has significant implications for the use of steroid antagonists in the clinical setting and could represent a heretofore unrecognized mechanism for the development of steroid resistance.

In a human breast carcinoma-derived cell line engineered to contain a hormone-responsive luciferase reporter gene, manipulation of cell growth conditions or cellular signal transduction in a variety of ways can enhance or impair glucocorticoid-mediated induction of a target gene. Induction may be enhanced as much as 10-fold or inhibited 90% by different treatments. For example, two different inhibitors of protein phosphatase-1 and -2A potentiated the hormone-dependent induction of luciferase. Activation of protein kinase-A via addition of 8-bromo-cAMP or forskolin also potentiated the hormonal induction, whereas 8-bromo-cGMP was ineffective. In contrast, activating protein kinase-A by inhibiting cAMP turnover with the phosphodiesterase inhibitors isobutylmethylxanthine or Ro20-1724 inhibited the hormone response rather than potentiated it. The inhibitory activity of isobutylmethylxanthine was evident even when activators of protein kinase-A are administered simultaneously. Isobutylmethylxanthine must, therefore, activate a signal transduction pathway in addition to the protein kinase-A pathway. Activation of protein kinase-C potentiated the hormone response in a cell-specific manner. Treatment with epidermal growth factor and imposition of cell stress by heat shock or inhibition of protein synthesis also enhanced the glucocorticoid response. Thus, our results suggest an elaborate coupling of the steroid response pathway with other cellular signal transduction mechanisms that permits an additional layer of control to be imposed on hormone-mediated transcriptional responses. It is proposed that cell-specific phosphorylation events influence steroid receptor interaction with the basal transcription apparatus, thereby altering receptor-mediated induction mechanisms.

Hepatic cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A) and sterol 27 hydroxylase activities were measured in fetal, newborn, suckling, and weaned piglets from 76 d into gestation to 49 d of age. Hepatic CYP7A activity was not detected in fetal microsomes, but it increased to 6.8 +/- 2.6 pmol/min x mg(-1) protein in suckling piglets at 21 d of age and to 18.2 +/- 2.5 in weaned piglets at 49 d of age. Hepatic CYP7A activity was not different between 49-d-old piglets weaned at 21 d and piglets suckled for 49 d (18.9 +/- 2.6 and 18.2 +/- 2.5 pmol/min x mg protein, respectively). Fasting for 14 h decreased CYP7A activity by 86% in both suckled and weaned piglets. Cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase activity remained decreased for at least 5 h after refeeding. Sterol 27-hydroxylase activity was also undetectable near birth, but was detectable by 21 d of age. Postnatally, sterol 27-hydroxylase activity was not influenced by age or suckling and weaning, as was CYP7A. Sterol 27-hydroxylase was decreased by 80% in piglets deprived of feed compared with piglets given free access. In contrast to CYP7A activity, 27-hydroxylase activity returned within 5 h after refeeding to levels observed in piglets given ad libitum access to feed. Similar to CYP7A enzyme activity, hepatic CYP7A mRNA was not detected in newborn piglets, but increased from 2.7 +/- 1.7 pg mRNA/microg RNA in suckling piglets at 21 d to 13.7 +/- 1.2 in 49-d-old piglets weaned at 21 d. As with enzyme activity, feed deprivation decreased CYP7A mRNA to barely detectable levels (< .5 pg/microg RNA), and which remained decreased for at least 5 h following refeeding (.6 +/- .3 and 2.67 +/- .4 pg mRNA/microg RNA for suckled and weaned piglets, respectively). In piglets allowed free access to feed, CYP7A mRNA concentrations were associated positively (P = .001) with enzyme activity. These results suggest that developmental regulation of CYP7A activity is the result of a pretranslational mechanism.

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, lovastatin, blocks targeting of the Rho and Ras families of small GTPases to their active sites by inhibiting protein prenylation. Control NIH3T3 cells, and those overexpressing human cyclin E protein were treated with lovastatin for 24 h to determine the effects of cyclin E overexpression on lovastatin-induced growth arrest and cell rounding. Lovastatin treatment (10 µM) of control 3T3 cells resulted in growth arrest at G1 accompanied by actin stress fiber disassembly, cell rounding, and decreased active RhoA from the membranous protein fraction. By contrast, in NIH3T3 cells overexpressing cyclin E, lovastatin did not cause loss of RhoA from the membrane (active) protein fraction, actin stress fiber disassembly, cell rounding or growth arrest within 24 h. Analysis of cell cycle proteins showed that 24 h of lovastatin treatment in the control cells caused an elevation in the levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 kip1 , inhibition of both cyclin E-and cyclin A-dependent kinase activity, and decreased levels of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb). By contrast, lovastatin treatment of the cyclin E overexpressors did not suppress either cyclin E-or cyclin A-dependent kinase activity, nor did it alter the level of maximally phosphorylated pRb, despite increased levels of p27 kip1 . However, by 72 h, the cyclin E overexpressors rounded up but remained attached to the substratum, indicating a delayed response to lovastatin. In contrast with lovastatin, inactivation of membrane-bound Rho proteins (i.e., GTP-bound RhoA, RhoB, RhoC) with botulinum C3 transferase caused cell rounding and G1 growth arrest in both cell types but did not inhibit cyclin E-dependent histone kinase activity in the cyclin E overexpressors. In addition, 24 h of cycloheximide treatment caused depletion of RhoA from the membrane (active) fraction in neo cells, but in the cells overexpressing cyclin E, RhoA remained in the active (membrane-associated) fraction. Our observations suggest that (1) RhoA activation occurs downstream of cyclin E-dependent kinase activation, and (2) overexpression of cyclin E decreased the turnover rate of active RhoA.