Among patients with a new diagnosis of CRC, most patients were found to have 25(OH)D levels consistent with either deficiency or insufficiency. In the subset of patients who received chemotherapy and took a vitamin D supplement, serum 25(OH)D levels increased, suggesting that vitamin D repletion is a feasible intervention during chemotherapy.

◥Background: Diet is associated with colorectal cancer survival. Yet, adherence to nutrition guidelines is low among colorectal cancer survivors.Methods: We conducted a pilot trial among colorectal cancer survivors to evaluate a 12-week remote dietary intervention. Participants received print materials and were randomized (1:1) to intervention (website, text messages) or wait-list control. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. We also explored change in diet from 0 to 12 and 24 weeks and change from 0 to 12 weeks in anthropometry and circulating biomarkers (Trial Registration: NCT02965521).Results: We randomized 50 colorectal cancer survivors (25 intervention, 25 control). Retention was 90% at 12 weeks and 84% at 24 weeks. Participants had a median age of 55 years and were 66% female, 70% non-Hispanic white, and 96% had a college degree. The intervention arm responded to a median 15 (71%) of 21 text messages that asked for a reply [interquartile range (IQR) ¼ 8, 19] and visited the website a median of 13 (15%) days (IQR ¼ 1, 33) of the 84 study days.Conclusions: We developed a Web-based dietary intervention for colorectal cancer survivors. Our pilot results suggest that colorectal cancer survivors may engage more with text messages than a study website. Research to improve tailoring of text messages, while maintaining scalability, is needed.Impact: Remote dietary interventions using text messages may be feasible for colorectal cancer survivors.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."

No abstract

Following definitive chemoradiation for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), patients face a variety of chronic issues including: bowel dysfunction, accelerated bone loss, sexual dysfunction, and psychosocial distress. The increasing incidence of this disease, high cure rates, and significant long-term sequelae warrant increased focus on optimal survivorship care following definitive chemoradiation. In order to establish our survivorship care model for ASCC patients, a multi-disciplinary team of experts performed a comprehensive literature review and summarized best practices for the multi-disciplinary management of this unique patient population. We reviewed principle domains of our survivorship approach: (1) management of chronic toxicities; (2) sexual health; (3) HIV management in affected patients; (4) psychosocial wellbeing; and (5) surveillance for disease recurrence and survivorship care delivery. We provide recommendations for the optimization of survivorship care for ASCC patients can through a multi-disciplinary approach that supports physical and psychological wellness.

No abstract

No abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the USA and worldwide. In the USA, nearly one-third of CRC cases are anatomically classified as rectal cancer. Over the past few decades, continued refinement of multimodality treatment and the introduction of new therapeutic agents have enhanced curative treatment rates and quality of life outcomes. As treatments improve and the incidence of young onset rectal cancer rises, the number of rectal cancer survivors grows each year. This trend highlights the growing importance of rectal cancer survivorship. Multimodality therapy with systemic chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and surgery can result in chronic toxicities in multiple organ systems, requiring a multi-disciplinary care model with services ranging from appropriate cancer surveillance to management of long-term toxicities and optimization of modifiable risk factors. Here, we review the evidence on these long-term toxicities and provide management considerations from consensus guidelines. Specific topics include bowel dysfunction from radiation and surgery, oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, accelerated bone degeneration, the impact of fluoropyrimidines on long-term cardiovascular health, urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and psychosocial distress. Additionally, we review modifiable risk factors to inform providers and rectal cancer survivors of various lifestyle and behavioral changes that can be made to improve their long-term health outcomes.

180 Background: The number of individuals living after a diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is increasing. Emerging data suggest modifiable lifestyle factors impact survival after colorectal cancer (CRC), however very little is known about survivorship in other GI cancers. Given the common thread of multimodality therapy among many GI cancer survivors, there is a paucity of data on sexual function, fertility, anxiety/depression, changes in comorbidities, and quality of life after cancer treatment. Additionally, existing cohort studies of GI survivors are primarily European, and further data are needed from survivor populations in the US . Methods: Patients of the University of California, San Francisco GI Oncology Survivorship Clinic who are designated disease-free are recruited by mail or in clinic. We send secure online questionnaires to participants every six months for five years and annually thereafter. At varying intervals, questionnaires solicit sociodemographics, diet, physical activity, fertility, medical and smoking history, fear of cancer recurrence, sexual health, quality of life, psychological well-being, and sleep quality. Pathoclinical disease characteristics, treatment, and recurrence status are abstracted from the medical record at baseline and updated annually. Results: Between February and August 2017, 111 patients were enrolled; 68% of participants completed ≥1 and 57% completed all baseline questionnaires. Most patients had a history of colon cancer (52%, n = 58) or rectal cancer (31%, n = 34). Other diseases include: anal cancer (12%, n = 13), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (3%, n = 3), and other GI cancers (3%, n = 3). Fifty-eight percent of patients were female, 76% identified as white and median age at diagnosis was 55 (range 20-81). Median time from initial GI cancer diagnosis to study entry was 27 months. Following the initial recruitment wave of established patients, the average rate of enrollment is ~3 patients/week. Conclusions: Results from this ongoing cohort study will improve our understanding of modifiable risk factors for GI cancer recurrence and key survivorship issues related to psychological well-being, sexual function, fertility management, and quality of life.