Objective To compare outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with either liver resection or transplantation. Methods A retrospective, single institution analysis of 413 HCC patients from 1999–2009. Results 413 patients with HCC underwent surgical resection (n=106), transplantation (n=270), or were listed without receiving transplantation (n=37). Excluding transplanted patients with incidental tumors (n=50), 257 patients with suspected HCC were listed with the intent to transplant (ITT). The median diameter of the largest tumor by radiography was 6.0 cm in resected, 3.0 cm in transplanted, and 3.4 cm in the listed-but-not-transplanted patients. Median time to transplant was 48 days. Recurrence rates were 19.8% for resection and 12.1% for all ITT patients. Overall, patient survival for resection vs. ITT patients was similar (5-year survival of 53.0% vs. 52.0%, NS). However, for HCC patients with MELD scores <10 and who radiologically met Milan or UCSF criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival rates were significantly improved in resected patients. For patients with MELD <10 and who met Milan criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival were 92.0% and 63.0% for resection (n=26) vs. 83.0% and 41.0% for ITT (n=73, p=0.036). For those with MELD <10 and met UCSF criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival was 94.0% and 62.0% for resection (n=33) vs. 81.0% and 40.0% for ITT (n=78, p=0.027). Conclusions Among known HCC patients with preserved liver function, resection was associated with superior patient survival versus transplantation. These results suggest surgical resection should remain the first line therapy for patients with HCC and compensated liver function who are candidates for resection.

No abstract

No abstract

Subtotal colectomy (STC) or total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed in two or three stages remain the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Minimally invasive laparoscopic approaches for STC and IPAA have been established for over a decade, having been shown to reduce postoperative pain, length of stay, and improve fertility. However “straight-stick” laparoscopy has ergonomic and visual disadvantages in the pelvis, which may contribute to IPAA failure. The robotic platform was developed to overcome these limitations. Robotic STC is associated with lower conversion rates and earlier return of bowel function with acceptably longer operative time (mean, 28 minutes) than laparoscopic STC. The robotic approach has also been shown in case series to be safe in urgent settings. Robotic IPAA is associated with lower blood loss and length of stay than laparoscopic IPAA. Robotic TPC/IPAA has been shown in small case series to be safe and feasible despite longer operating times.