PMA and PNA contribute to the inter-individual variability of propofol clearance with very fast maturation of clearance in neonatal life. This implicates that preterm neonates and neonates in the first week of postnatal life are at an increased risk for accumulation during either intermittent bolus or continuous administration of propofol.

PurposeTo explore different allometric equations for scaling clearance across the human life-span using propofol as a model drug.MethodsData from seven previously published propofol studies ((pre)term neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents and adults) were analysed using NONMEM VI. To scale clearance, a bodyweight-based exponential equation with four different structures for the exponent was used: (I) 3/4 allometric scaling model; (II) mixture model; (III) bodyweight-cut-point separated model; (IV) bodyweight-dependent exponent model.ResultsModel I adequately described clearance in adults and older children, but overestimated clearance of neonates and underestimated clearance of infants. Use of two different exponents in Model II and Model III showed significantly improved performance, but yielded ambiguities on the boundaries of the two subpopulations. This discontinuity was overcome in Model IV, in which the exponent changed sigmoidally from 1.35 at a hypothetical bodyweight of 0 kg to a value of 0.56 from 10 kg onwards, thereby describing clearance of all individuals best.ConclusionsA model was developed for scaling clearance over the entire human life-span with a single continuous equation, in which the exponent of the bodyweight-based exponential equation varied with bodyweight.

IntroductionAcetaminophen (paracetamol) is mainly metabolized via glucuronidation and sulphation, while the minor pathway through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2E1 is held responsible for hepatotoxicity. In obese patients, CYP2E1 activity is reported to be induced, thereby potentially worsening the safety profile of acetaminophen. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen and its metabolites (glucuronide, sulphate, cysteine and mercapturate) in morbidly obese and non-obese patients.MethodsTwenty morbidly obese patients (with a median total body weight [TBW] of 140.1 kg [range 106–193.1 kg] and body mass index [BMI] of 45.1 kg/m2 [40–55.2 kg/m2]) and eight non-obese patients (with a TBW of 69.4 kg [53.4–91.7] and BMI of 21.8 kg/m2 [19.4–27.4]) received 2 g of intravenous acetaminophen. Fifteen blood samples were collected per patient. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM.ResultsIn morbidly obese patients, the median area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0–8h) of acetaminophen was significantly smaller (P = 0.009), while the AUC0–8h ratios of the glucuronide, sulphate and cysteine metabolites to acetaminophen were significantly higher (P = 0.043, 0.004 and 0.010, respectively). In the model, acetaminophen CYP2E1-mediated clearance (cysteine and mercapturate) increased with lean body weight [LBW] (population mean [relative standard error] 0.0185 L/min [15 %], P < 0.01). Moreover, accelerated formation of the cysteine and mercapturate metabolites was found with increasing LBW (P < 0.001). Glucuronidation clearance (0.219 L/min [5 %]) and sulphation clearance (0.0646 L/min [6 %]) also increased with LBW (P < 0.001).ConclusionObesity leads to lower acetaminophen concentrations and earlier and higher peak concentrations of acetaminophen cysteine and mercapturate. While a higher dose may be anticipated to achieve adequate acetaminophen concentrations, the increased CYP2E1-mediated pathway may preclude this dose adjustment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0357-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

AIMFor scaling clearance between adults and children, allometric scaling with a fixed exponent of 0.75 is often applied. In this analysis, we performed a systematic study on the allometric exponent for scaling propofol clearance between two subpopulations selected from neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents and adults. METHODSSeven propofol studies were included in the analysis (neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents, adults1 and adults2). In a systematic manner, two out of the six study populations were selected resulting in 15 combined datasets. In addition, the data of the seven studies were regrouped into five age groups (FDA Guidance 1998), from which four combined datasets were prepared consisting of one paediatric age group and the adult group. In each of these 19 combined datasets, the allometric scaling exponent for clearance was estimated using population pharmacokinetic modelling (NONMEM 7.2). RESULTSThe allometric exponent for propofol clearance varied between 1.11 and 2.01 in cases where the neonate dataset was included. When two paediatric datasets were analyzed, the exponent varied between 0.2 and 2.01, while it varied between 0.56 and 0.81 when the adult population and a paediatric dataset except for neonates were selected. Scaling from adults to adolescents, children, infants and neonates resulted in exponents of 0.74, 0.70, 0.60 and 1.11 respectively.

AIMA recent report on intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK) showed a higher total clearance in women at delivery compared with non-pregnant women. To describe the paracetamol metabolic and elimination routes involved in this increase in clearance, we performed a population PK analysis in women at delivery and post-partum in which the different pathways were considered. METHODSPopulation PK parameters using non-linear mixed effect modelling were estimated in a two-period PK study in women to whom i.v. paracetamol (2 g loading dose followed by 1 g every 6 h up to 24 h) was administered immediately following Caesarean delivery and in a subgroup of the same women to whom single 2 g i.v.loading dose was administered 10-15 weeks post-partum. RESULTSPopulation PK analysis was performed based on 255 plasma and 71 urine samples collected in 39 women at delivery and in eight of these 39 women 12 weeks post-partum. Total clearance was higher in women at delivery compared with 12th post-partum week (21.1 vs. 11.7 l h -1 ) due to higher clearances to paracetamol glucuronide (11.6 vs. 4.76 l h ). In contrast, there was no difference in clearance to paracetamol sulphate. CONCLUSIONThe increased total paracetamol clearance at delivery is caused by a disproportional increase in glucuronidation clearance and a proportional increase in clearance of unchanged paracetamol and in oxidation clearance, of which the latter may potentially limit further dose increase in this patient group. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• In adults, paracetamol is almost exclusively metabolized by the hepatic route and excreted into urine, with paracetamol glucuronide (47-62%) and paracetamol sulphate (25-36%) as the main metabolites. Between 8-10% of the paracetamol dose is oxidized by cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1) into 3-hydroxy-paracetamol and the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone-imine (NAPQI), while only 1-4% is excreted in urine as unchanged paracetamol.• Total clearance of paracetamol appears higher at Caesarean delivery compared with healthy female volunteers but it is unknown which pathways are affected. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• Population pharmacokinetic modelling showed a substantially higher paracetamol clearance in women at delivery compared with a subset of the same women 12 weeks post-partum.• The increase in total paracetamol clearance at delivery is due to a disproportional increase in glucuronidation clearance and a proportional increase in clearance of unchanged paracetamol and in oxidation clearance.• Compared with modelling based on metabolite fractions retrieved in urine only, population modelling based on both plasma and urine collections was of added value to gain insight into how different metabolic pathways of paracetamol contribute to changes in total clearance.

For propofol clearance, allometric scaling has been applied successfully for extrapolations between species (rats and humans) and within the human bodyweight range (children and adults). In this analysis, the human bodyweight range is explored to determine for which range an allometric model with a fixed or estimated exponent can be used to predict propofol clearance, without correction for maturation. The predictive value of the allometric equation, clearance (CL) is equal to 0.071 x bodyweight in kg0.78, which was developed from rats, children and adults, and the predictive value of a fixed exponent allometric model derived from the basal metabolic rate, CL is equal to CL standardized to a 70 kg adult x (bodyweight in kg standardized to a 70 kg adult)0.75, were evaluated across five independent patient groups including (i) 25 (pre)term neonates with a postmenstrual age of 27-43 weeks; (ii) 22 postoperative infants aged 4-18 months; (iii) 12 toddlers aged 1-3 years; (iv) 14 adolescents aged 10-20 years; and (v) 26 critically ill adults sedated long term. The median percentage error of the predictions was calculated using the equation %error = (CL(allometric) - CL(i))/CL(i) x 100, where CL(allometric) is the predicted propofol clearance from the allometric equations for each individual and CL(i) is the individual-predicted (post hoc) propofol clearance value derived from published population pharmacokinetic models. In neonates, the allometric model developed from rats, children and adults, and the fixed-exponent allometric model, systematically overpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of 288% and 216%, respectively, whereas in infants, both models systematically underpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of -43% and -55%, respectively. In toddlers, adolescents and adults, both models performed reasonably well, with median percentage errors of -12% and -32%, respectively, in toddlers, 16% and -14%, respectively, in adolescents, and 12% and -18%, respectively, in adults. Both allometric models based on bodyweight alone may be of use to predict propofol clearance in individuals older than 2 years. Approaches that also incorporate maturation are required to predict clearance under the age of 2 years.

Since in vitro studies and a preliminary clinical report suggested the efficacy of chloroquine for COVID-19-associated pneumonia, there is increasing interest in this old antimalarial drug. In this article, we discuss the pharmacokinetics and safety of chloroquine that should be considered in light of use in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Chloroquine is well absorbed and distributes extensively resulting in a large volume of distribution with an apparent and terminal half-life of 1.6 days and 2 weeks, respectively. Chloroquine is metabolized by cytochrome P450 and renal clearance is responsible for one third of total clearance. The lack of reliable information on target concentrations or doses for COVID-19 implies that for both adults and children, doses that proved effective and safe in malaria should be considered, such as 'loading doses' in adults (30 mg/kg over 48 h) and children (70 mg/kg over 5 days), which reported good tolerability. Here, plasma concentrations were < 2.5 μmol/L, which is associated with (minor) toxicity. While the influence of renal dysfunction, critical illness, or obesity seems small, in critically ill patients, reduced absorption may be anticipated. Clinical experience has shown that chloroquine has a narrow safety margin, as three times the adult therapeutic dosage for malaria can be lethal when given as a single dose. Although infrequent, poisoning in children is extremely dangerous where one to two tablets can potentially be fatal. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetic and safety properties of chloroquine suggest that chloroquine can be used safely for an acute virus infection, under corrected QT monitoring, but also that the safety margin is small, particularly in children.

We developed a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol in morbidly obese patients, in which TBW proved to be the major determinant of clearance, using an allometric function with an exponent of 0.72. For the other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, no covariates could be identified. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00395681.