No abstract

Purpose: Expediting the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) would benefit care management, especially for the start of treatments requiring histological evidence. This study evaluated the combined diagnostic performance of circulating biomarkers obtained by peripheral and portal blood liquid biopsy in patients with resectable PDAC. Experimental design: Liquid biopsies were performed in a prospective translational clinical trial (PANC-CTC #NCT03032913) including 22 patients with resectable PDAC and 28 noncancer controls from February to November 2017. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were detected using the CellSearch® method or after RosetteSep® enrichment combined with CRISPR/Cas9-improved KRAS mutant alleles quantification by droplet digital PCR. CD63 bead-coupled Glypican-1 (GPC1)-positive exosomes were quantified by flow cytometry. Results: Liquid biopsies were positive in 7/22 (32%), 13/22 (59%), and 14/22 (64%) patients with CellSearch® or RosetteSep®-based CTC detection or GPC1-positive exosomes, respectively, in peripheral and/or portal blood. Liquid biopsy performance was improved in portal blood only with CellSearch®, reaching 45% of PDAC identification (5/11) versus 10% (2/22) in peripheral blood. Importantly, combining CTC and GPC1-positive-exosome detection displayed 100% of sensitivity and 80% of specificity, with a negative predictive value of 100%. High levels of GPC1+-exosomes and/or CTC presence were significantly correlated with progression-free survival and with overall survival when CTC clusters were found. Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate combined CTC and exosome detection to diagnose resectable pancreatic cancers. Liquid biopsy combining several biomarkers could provide a rapid, reliable, noninvasive decision-making tool in early, potentially curable pancreatic cancer. Moreover, the prognostic value could select patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. This exploratory study deserves further validation.

Tumor-released extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain tumor-specific cargo distinguishing them from healthy EVs, and making them eligible as circulating biomarkers. Glypican 1 (GPC1)-positive exosome relevance as liquid biopsy elements is still debated. We carried out a prospective study to quantify GPC1-positive exosomes in sera from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients undergoing up-front surgery, as compared to controls including patients without cancer history and patients displaying pancreatic preneoplasic lesions. Sera were enriched in EVs, and exosomes were pulled down with anti-CD63 coupled magnetic beads. GPC1-positive bead percentages determined by flow cytometry were significantly higher in PDAC than in the control group. Diagnosis accuracy reached 78% (sensitivity 64% and specificity 90%), when results from peripheral and portal blood were combined. In association with echo-guided-ultrasound-fine-needle-aspiration (EUS-FNA) negative predictive value was 80% as compared to 33% for EUS-FNA only. This approach is clinically relevant as a companion test to the already available diagnostic tools, since patients with GPC1-positive exosomes in peripheral blood showed decreased tumor free survival.

The high mobility group A (HMGA2) gene encodes a protein that alters chromatin structure and regulates the transcription of many genes; it is implicated in both benign and malignant neoplasias, but its rearrangements are a feature of development of several mesenchymal tumors. Given its implication in these tumors and particularly adipocytic tumors, and the availability of antibodies usable on paraffin-embedded tissues, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of this gene in a series of 1052 mesenchymal tumors. The objective was to define the value and limitations of HMGA2 immunohistochemical expression for histotyping, and compare with molecular data reported in the literature. We thus analyzed 880 cases on tissue microarray and 182 cases on whole sections (211 adipocytic tumors, 628 sarcomas, 213 benign mesenchymal tumors, and 10 normal adipose tissues). A nuclear immunostaining was detected in 86% of conventional and intramuscular lipomas, in 86% of well-differentiated liposarcomas and in 67% of dedifferentiated liposarcomas, as opposed to 16% of other benign adipose tumors and to 15% of non-well-differentiated liposarcoma/dedifferentiated liposarcoma sarcomas. Among benign mesenchymal tumors and lesions, it was detected in 90% of nodular fasciitis and in 88% of benign fibrous histiocytomas with respective specificities of 85 and 100%, and in 90% of aggressive angiomyxoma, contrary to other vulvovaginal tumor types, which expressed HMGA2 only rarely. The normal adipose tissue was always negative for HMGA2. Although not specific, immunohistochemical detection of the HMGA2 protein is helpful for the distinction of normal adipose tissue from well-differentiated lesions, particularly on biopsy or on re-excision. It is less sensitive than MDM2/CDK4 for dedifferentiated liposarcomas diagnosis, but it appears more specific to distinguish dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other poorly differentiated sarcomas. Finally, and may be more importantly, HMGA2 is useful for the diagnosis of benign fibrous histiocytoma, nodular fasciitis and vulvovaginal benign mesenchymal tumors.

Background:DT01 is a DNA-repair inhibitor preventing recruitment of DNA-repair enzymes at damage sites. Safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy through intratumoural and peritumoural injections of DT01 were evaluated in combination with radiotherapy in a first-in-human phase I trial in patients with unresectable skin metastases from melanoma.Methods:Twenty-three patients were included and received radiotherapy (30 Gy in 10 sessions) on all selected tumour lesions, comprising of two lesions injected with DT01 three times a week during the 2 weeks of radiotherapy. DT01 dose levels of 16, 32, 48, 64 and 96 mg were used, in a 3+3 dose escalation design, with an expansion cohort at 96 mg.Results:The median follow-up was 180 days. All patients were evaluable for safety and pharmacokinetics. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed and the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Most frequent adverse events were reversible grades 1 and 2 injection site reactions. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated a systemic passage of DT01. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for efficacy on 76 lesions. Objective response was observed in 45 lesions (59%), including 23 complete responses (30%).Conclusions:Intratumoural and peritumoural DT01 in combination with radiotherapy is safe and pharmacokinetic analyses suggest a systemic passage of DT01.