NCT02353026.

Overactivation of the ErbB protein family, which is comprised of 4 receptor tyrosine kinase members (ErbB1/epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/HER1, ErbB2/HER2, ErbB3/HER3, and ErbB4/HER4), can drive the development and progression of a wide variety of malignancies, including colorectal, head and neck, and certain non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). As a result, agents that target a specific member of the ErbB family have been developed for the treatment of cancer. These agents include the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib and gefitinib; the EGFR-targeting monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab; and the HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Lapatinib is a dual TKI that targets both EGFR and HER2. In addition, TKIs that inhibit multiple members of the ErbB family and also bind their targets irreversibly are under evaluation for the treatment of cancer. Three such compounds have progressed into clinical studies: the EGFR, HER2, and HER4 inhibitors afatinib, dacomitinib, and neratinib. Phase I studies of these agents have shown clinical activity in NSCLC, breast cancer, and other malignancies. Currently, afatinib is approved for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and is in development for squamous NSCLC, and dacomitinib is in phase III of clinical development for NSCLC, neratinib is in phase III of clinical development for the treatment of breast cancer, and afatinib is also in phase III development in head and neck cancer. Final results from clinical trials may lead to the potential approval of these agents in a variety of solid tumor malignancies.

Purpose Pre-clinical data suggest that combining imatinib with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy may improve imatinib efficacy. We conducted a Phase I study of imatinib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods Patients were accrued to the study in a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients were restaged every two cycles, and those with stable disease (SD), or better, continued study treatment without interruption. Maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) and pharmacokinetic profiles of combination imatinib and paclitaxel were assessed. Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, including 40 in the Phase I dose escalation portion. Alternating dose escalation of imatinib and paclitaxel on a 28-day cycle resulted in MTDs of 800 mg imatinib daily, on days 1–4, 8–11, 15–18, and 22–25, and 100 mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly, on days 3, 10, and 17. Two expansion cohorts, comprising 10 breast cancer patients and 8 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, were enrolled at the MTDs. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms (64 %) and nausea/vomiting (71 %). The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26 %), flu-like symptoms (12 %), and pain (12 %). There were no relevant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug when given in combination compared with alone. Thirty-eight subjects were evaluable for response, 18 (47.4 %) of whom experienced clinical benefit. Five patients (13.2 %) had a partial response (PR) and 13 patients (34.2 %) had SD; the average time to progression in those with clinical benefit was 17 weeks (range: 7–28 weeks). Conclusions This combination of imatinib and paclitaxel was reasonably safe and tolerable, and demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity. Further exploration in disease-specific Phase II trials is warranted.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal cancers globally, with a significant need for improved therapeutic options. While the recent breakthroughs of immunotherapy through checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically changed treatment paradigms in other malignancies based on considerable survival benefits, this is not so for pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapies with modest benefits are still the cornerstone of advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Pancreatic cancers are inherently immune-cold tumors and have been largely refractory to immunotherapies in clinical trials. Understanding and overcoming the current failures of immunotherapy through elucidating resistance mechanisms and developing novel therapeutic approaches are essential to harnessing the potential durable benefits of immune-modulating therapy in pancreatic cancer patients.

This is a review of the current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and what to expect from this evolving field in the future. Individualized medicine is moving from broad panel testing of numerous genes or gene products in tumor biopsy samples, identifying biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response, to relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy assays, building on what we have learned in our tumor analysis and growing into its own evolving predictive and prognostic subspecialty. Hence, the field of GI precision oncology is exploding, and this review endeavors to summarize where we are now in preparation for the journey ahead.