The objective of the current study was to evaluate the types and concentrations of volatile organic compounds ( VOCs ) in the passenger cabin of selected sedan automobiles under static ( parked, unventilated ) and specified conditions of operation ( i.e., driving the vehicle using air conditioning alone, vent mode alone, or driver's window half open ). Data were collected on five different passenger sedan vehicles from three major automobile manufacturers. Airborne concentrations were assessed using 90 -min time -weighted average ( TWA ) samples under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( USEPA ) Method IP -1B to assess individual VOC compounds and total VOCs ( TVOCs ) calibrated to toluene. Static vehicle testing demonstrated TVOC levels of approximately 400 -800 g / m 3 at warm interior vehicle temperatures ( approximately 808F ), whereas TVOCs at least fivefold higher were observed under extreme heat conditions ( e.g., up to 1458F ). The profile of most prevalent individual VOC compounds varied considerably according to vehicle brand, age, and interior temperature tested, with predominant compounds including styrene, toluene, and 8 -to 12 -carbon VOCs. TVOC levels under varied operating conditions ( and ventilation ) were generally four -to eightfold lower ( at approximately 50 -160 g / m 3 ) than the static vehicle measurements under warm conditions, with the lowest measured levels generally observed in the trials with the driver's window half open. These data indicate that while relatively high concentrations of certain VOCs can be measured inside static vehicles under extreme heat conditions, normal modes of operation rapidly reduce the inside -vehicle VOC concentrations even when the air conditioning is set on recirculation mode.
There is scant information pertaining to airborne ammonia exposures from either spills or common household uses of ammonia-containing floor and tile cleaners or from spray-on glass cleaners. We assessed instantaneous and event-specific time-weighted average (TWA) exposures to airborne ammonia during spills and use (per label directions) of a household floor and tile cleaner and two spray-on window cleaners. Airborne ammonia levels measured at breathing zone height (BZH) above the spilled floor and tile cleaner product reached 500 p.p.m. within 5 min, while levels for spilled window cleaner were below 8 p.p.m. TWA exposures were assessed while tile walls and floors were cleaned in three different bathrooms of a residence, and during use of a spray-on glass cleaner while washing several large windows in an office setting. NIOSH Method 6015 was utilized with concurrent field measurements every 60 s using a Drager PAC III monitor with an electrochemical cell detector. Peak ammonia levels ranged from 16 to 28 p.p.m. and short-term TWA concentrations ranged from 9.4 to 13 p.p.m. during mixing (0.1% ammonia) and cleaning tiles in the three bathrooms. Ammonia exposures while using spray-on window cleaner were over 10-fold lower (TWA ¼ 0.65 p.p.m.). Use of the floor and tile cleaner mixed at 0.2% ammonia led to peak airborne ammonia levels within 3-5 min at 36-90 p.p.m., and use of full strength cleaner (3% ammonia) led to peak ammonia levels of 125 to 4200 p.p.m. within 2-3 min. Spillage or intentional use of the full strength floor and tile cleaner led to airborne ammonia concentrations that exceed occupational short-term exposure limits, while spillage or use of the spray-on window cleaner did not approach potentially hazardous airborne ammonia levels and likely represents a minimal inhalation health hazard. We conclude that routine household uses of ammonia are unlikely to produce significant exposures when using standard cleaning solutions (0.1-0.2%), but spillage or use of concentrated ammonia solutions (e.g., 3%) in poorly ventilated areas can lead to potentially hazardous airborne ammonia exposures.
This study examines benzene emissions from the use of a metal parts washer ("degreaser") supplied with a mineral spirits solvent containing either 9 or 58 ppm benzene. Air samples were obtained during a one-hour session of relatively vigorous parts cleaning activity using a degreaser station equipped with wet brush and sprayer attachments and a compressed air hose. Two methods were utilized to assess airborne benzene levels: U.S. EPA TO-14 (summa stainless steel canister) and NIOSH 1501 (charcoal tube). Overall, both methods provided similar results, excepting detection limit differences. The first simulation was performed with recycled solvent (9 ppm benzene in solvent) showing average one-hour airborne benzene levels < or =33 ppbv in the worker's breathing zone and directly above the parts cleaning tank. Average airborne benzene concentrations 18 inches away from the tank were below 2 ppbv during the 60-minute cleaning protocol. The second simulation with benzene-spiked recycled solvent (58 ppm benzene) showed airborne benzene levels averaging 500 ppbv measured over the 60-minute cleaning period in the worker's breathing zone and directly above the tank, while average concentrations 18 inches from the tank perimeter were 63 ppbv. The data indicate that average and peak exposures to airborne benzene were roughly proportional to the solvent benzene content, although the brief peak exposures exhibited greater variance probably related to aerosol generation associated with the use of the brush and/or spraying attachment. Under this selected upper bound exposure simulation, we found that cleaning parts using a recycled mineral spirits-based solvent in an open warehouse setting did not result in exposures in excess of the current occupational exposure limit of 0.5 ppm averaged over 8 hours for solvent benzene content between 9 and 58 ppm.
Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) is a rare disease involving concentric bronchiolar fibrosis that develops rapidly following inhalation of certain irritant gases at sufficiently high acute doses. While there are many potential causes of bronchiolar lesions involved in a variety of chronic lung diseases, failure to clearly define the clinical features and pathological characteristics can lead to ambiguous diagnoses. Irritant gases known to cause BO follow a similar pathologic process and time course of disease onset in humans. Studies of inhaled irritant gases known to cause BO (e.g., chlorine, hydrochloric acid, ammonia, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, sulfur or nitrogen mustards, and phosgene) indicate that the time course between causal chemical exposures and development of clinically significant BO disease is typically limited to a few months. The mechanism of toxic action exerted by these irritant gases generally involves widespread and severe injury of the epithelial lining of the bronchioles that leads to acute respiratory symptoms which can include lung edema within days. Repeated exposures to inhaled irritant gases at concentrations insufficient to cause marked respiratory distress or edema may lead to adaptive responses that can reduce or prevent severe bronchiolar fibrotic changes. Risk of BO from irritant gases is driven substantially by toxicokinetics affecting concentrations occurring at the bronchiolar epithelium. Highly soluble irritant gases that cause BO like ammonia generally follow a threshold-dependent cytotoxic mechanism of action that at sufficiently high doses results in severe inflammation of the upper respiratory tract and the bronchiolar epithelium concurrently. This is followed by acute respiratory distress, pulmonary edema, and post inflammatory concentric fibrosis that become clinically obvious within a few months. In contrast, irritant gases with lower solubility like phosgene also follow a threshold-dependent mechanism of cytotoxicity action but can exhibit more insidious and isolated bronchiolar tissue damage with a similar latency to fibrosis. To date, animal and human studies on the highly soluble gas, diacetyl, have not identified a coherent pattern of pathology and latency that would be expected based on studies of other known causes of bronchiolitis obliterans disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.