The self-esteem, anxiety and past and present educational histories of 16 dyslexic university students and 16 matched controls were compared. Self-esteem was measured using the Culture-free Self-esteem Inventory and anxiety was measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. A questionnaire devised by the research team was used to gather information on past and present educational histories, including a number of questions that could be rated on a five point scale. The dyslexic group was found to have significantly lower self-esteem than the controls. On the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory there was no significant difference between the groups. On the five point rating scales the dyslexic group reported themselves as feeling more anxious and less competent in their written work at school than the controls and rated themselves at university as less competent both in their written work and in their academic achievements.

This study explored the links between the development of language and the development of social cognition. Measures of language, phonological short-term memory, social cognition, and social competence of two groups of children with specific language impairment (SLI), one group attending a special school, the other attending integrated educational placements, were compared with those of chronological and language age-matched normally developing peers (N = 8 in each group). Significant differences between the scores of normally developing children and the scores of the group of children with SLI who attended the special school were found for social cognition and ratings of social competence. Children with SLI from integrated placements did not differ significantly from other groups on these measures. Assessments of language development and phonological short-term memory were not related to social cognition and social competence. Models of the possible relationship between social cognition and language development in children with SLI are discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

The two checklists if used together provide useful information on the profiles of strengths and weaknesses of children with a range of communication and or emotional/behavioural difficulties. The use of both checklists in this study demonstrated the differential profiles of pragmatic competence and socio-emotional adjustment of children with different types of communication difficulty.