The molecular pathogenesis of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA), a rare astrocytic brain tumor with a relatively favorable prognosis, is still poorly understood. We characterized 50 PXAs by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and found the most common imbalance to be loss on chromosome 9 in 50% of tumors. Other recurrent losses affected chromosomes 17 (10%), 8, 18, 22 (4% each). Recurrent gains were identified on chromosomes X (16%), 7, 9q, 20 (8% each), 4, 5, 19 (4% each). Two tumors demonstrated amplifications mapping to 2p23-p25, 4p15, 12q13, 12q21, 21q21 and 21q22. Analysis of 10 PXAs with available high molecular weight DNA by high-resolution array-based CGH indicated homozygous 9p21.3 deletions involving the CDKN2A/ p14 ARF /CDKN2B loci in six tumors (60%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization to tissue sections confirmed the presence of tumor cells with homozygous 9p21.3 deletions. Mutational analysis of candidate genes on 9q, PTCH and TSC1, revealed no mutations in PXAs with 9q loss and no evidence of TSC1 promoter methylation. However, PXAs consistently showed low TSC1 transcript levels. Taken together, our study identifies loss of chromosome 9 as the most common chromosomal imbalance in PXAs and suggests important roles for homozygous CDKN2A/p14 ARF /CDKN2B deletion as well as low TSC1 mRNA expression in these tumors.
Comprehensive characterization of genomic aberrations in gangliogliomas by CGH, array-based CGH and interphase FISH Abstract Gangliogliomas are generally benign neuroepithelial tumors composed of dysplastic neuronal and neoplastic glial elements. We screened 61 gangliogliomas [World Health Organization (WHO) grade I] for genomic alterations by chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Aberrations were detected in 66% of gangliogliomas (mean +/-SEM = 2.5 +/-0.5 alterations/tumor). Frequent gains were on chromosomes 7 (21%), 5 (16%), 8 (13%), 12 (12%); frequent losses on 22q (16%), 9 (10%), 10 (8%). Recurrent partial imbalances comprised the minimal overlapping regions dim(10)(q25) and enh(12)(q13.3-q14.1). Unsupervised cluster analysis of genomic profiles detected two major subgroups (group I: complete gain of 7 and additional gains of 5, 8 or 12; group II: no major recurring imbalances, mainly losses). A comparison with low-grade gliomas (astrocytomas WHO grade II) showed chromosome 5 gain to be significantly more frequent in gangliogliomas. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identified the aberrations to be contained in a subpopulation of glial but not in neuronal cells. Two gangliogliomas and their anaplastic recurrences (WHO grade III) were analyzed. Losses of CDKN2A/B and DMBT1 or a gain/amplification of CDK4 found in the anaplastic tumors were already present in the respective gangliogliomas by array CGH and interphase FISH. In summary, genomic profiling in a large series of gangliogliomas could distinguish genetic subgroups even in this low-grade tumor. ABSTRACTGangliogliomas are generally benign neuroepithelial tumors composed of dysplastic neuronal and neoplastic glial elements. We screened 61 gangliogliomas (WHO grade I) for genomic alterations by chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).Aberrations were detected in 66% of gangliogliomas (2.5±0.5 (mean±SEM) alterations/tumor). Frequent gains were on chromosomes 7 (21%), 5 (16%), 8 (13%), 12 (12%); frequent losses on 22q (16%), 9 (10%), 10 (8%). Recurrent partial imbalances comprised the minimal overlapping regions dim(10)(q25) and enh(12)(q13.3-q14.1).Unsupervised cluster analysis of genomic profiles detected two major subgroups (group I:complete gain of 7 and additional gains of 5, 8, or 12; group II: no major recurring imbalances, mainly losses). A comparison with low-grade gliomas (astrocytomas WHO grade II) showed chromosome 5 gain to be significantly more frequent in gangliogliomas.Interphase-FISH identified the aberrations to be contained in a subpopulation of glial but not in neuronal cells. Two gangliogliomas and their anaplastic recurrences (WHO grade III) were analyzed. Losses of CDKN2A/B and DMBT1 or a gain/amplification of CDK4 found in the anaplastic tumors were already present in the respective gangliogliomas by array-CGH and interphase-FISH. In summary, genomic profiling in a large series of gangliogliomas could distinguish genetic subgroups even in this low-grade ...
Deletions on chromosomes 1p and 19q are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with oligodendroglial tumors. The aim of our study was to identify additional genomic aberrations linked to patient survival. We performed a genome‐wide screen for genomic imbalances by comparative genomic hybridization on tumors from 70 patients, including 40 oligodendrogliomas, 30 oligoastrocytomas (21 WHO grade II tumors, 49 WHO grade III tumors). Data were correlated with overall patient survival (OS, median follow‐up: 5.8 years). The most frequent aberrations were losses on chromosome 19q (64%), 1p (59%), 9p (26%), 4q (21%), 10q (19%), 18q (17%); gains on 7q (24%), 19p (19%), 7p (17%). In univariate analyses, combined 1p/19q and 19q loss were significantly associated with longer OS, and gains on 7, 8q, 19q, 20, losses on 9p, 10, 18q, Xp with shorter OS. Multivariate analyses showed the most significant prognostic factors for OS of patients with any oligodendroglial tumor to be WHO grade [odds ratio (OR) 8], 7p gain (OR 6), 9p loss (OR 3); for OS of patients with anaplastic tumors to be 7p gain (OR 10), 8q gain (OR 5), 18q loss (OR 3). Patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors containing one or more prognostically unfavorable genomic aberration had a poor outcome independent of the 1p/19q status. In summary, we identified several independent genomic markers of shorter survival in patients with oligodendroglial tumors. Thus, molecular diagnostic testing, which is usually restricted to 1p/19q deletion analysis, may need to be refined by additionally assessing the prognostically unfavorable genomic aberrations identified. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.