Objective Although there has been much debate on whether women should be allowed to eat and drink during labour, little scientific data are available on the effects of caloric intake on the course of labour. Design Double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled.Setting Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.Population Two hundred and one consecutive nulliparous women, pregnant of a single fetus in cephalic presentation. Methods All women were included in early labour (2cm -4cm of cervical dilatation) and were allowed to drink at will. Main outcome measures The duration of labour, the need for augmentation and pain medication and the incidence of abdominal and vaginal instrumental deliveries. Results Drinking of carbohydrate solutions was well tolerated, but did not show any beneficial effects regarding labour outcome when compared with the control group. In the carbohydrate group, a higher caesarean section rate was observed (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.29 -6.54). Conclusions Women in the carbohydrate group had worse labour outcome. It is unclear whether a statistical coincidence, a negative effect of the carbohydrate intake or an incorrect carbohydrate intake strategy is responsible for these results. Further studies are necessary before any definite conclusion can be drawn.
The study design did not enable us to draw conclusions about the cause and effect between caloric intake and labor progress. Scientific data with respect to the giving of evidence-based advice about eating and drinking during labor are lacking. Should such advice become available, women are likely to follow it.
Oral carbohydrate intake during labor seems to be safe regarding the fetal acid-base balance. Further study on the maternal and fetal metabolic parameters is essential to give a more complete picture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.