Gene editing the BCL11A erythroid enhancer is a validated approach to fetal hemoglobin (HbF) induction for β-hemoglobinopathy therapy, though heterogeneity in edit allele distribution and HbF response may impact its safety and efficacy. Here we compared combined CRISPR-Cas9 endonuclease editing of the BCL11A +58 and +55 enhancers with leading gene modification approaches under clinical investigation. We found that combined targeting of the BCL11A +58 and +55 enhancers with 3xNLS-SpCas9 and two sgRNAs resulted in superior HbF induction, including in engrafting erythroid cells from sickle cell disease (SCD) patient xenografts, attributable to simultaneous disruption of core half E-box/GATA motifs at both enhancers. We corroborated prior observations that double strand breaks (DSBs) could produce unintended on-target outcomes in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) such as long deletions and centromere-distal chromosome fragment loss. We show these unintended outcomes are a byproduct of cellular proliferation stimulated by ex vivo culture. Editing HSPCs without cytokine culture bypassed long deletion and micronuclei formation while preserving efficient on-target editing and engraftment function. These results indicate that nuclease editing of quiescent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) limits DSB genotoxicity while maintaining therapeutic potency and encourages efforts for in vivo delivery of nucleases to HSCs.
Targeting the BCL11A erythroid enhancer by gene editing is a promising approach to fetal hemoglobin induction for beta-hemoglobinopathies. HbF levels vary widely among individuals, suggesting potential heterogeneity in HbF responses after therapeutic intervention. We hypothesize that maximizing both gene edit frequency and HbF induction potential could promote consistently favorable clinical outcomes. Here we compared CRISPR-Cas9 endonuclease editing of the BCL11A +58 enhancer with alternative gene modification approaches, including +55 erythroid enhancer editing alone or in combination with the +58 enhancer, as well as editing targeting the HBG1/2 promoter -115 BCL11A binding site and transduction by an shRNA knocking down the BCL11A transcript in erythroid precursors. We found that combined targeting of the BCL11A +58 and +55 enhancers with 3xNLS-SpCas9 and two sgRNAs resulted in the most potent HbF induction (52.4%±6.3%) of tested approaches (BCL11A +58 editing alone, 29.1%±3.9%; BCL11A +55 editing alone, 34.8±5.1%; HBG1/2 promoter editing, 34.1% ±5.4%; shmiR-BCL11A, 32.2%±4.4%; mock, 7.6%±3.4%). Based on assays in bulk and single cell derived erythroid cultures and xenografted immunodeficient mice, we found that disruption of core half E-box/GATA motifs at both the +58 and +55 enhancers was associated with greatest HbF induction, whether by small indels, interstitial 3.1 kb deletion, or 3.1 kb inversion. Rare gene edited clones with alleles that only partially disrupted these motifs were associated with intermediate HbF induction phenotypes. Combined editing of BCL11A +58 and +55 enhancers was compatible with HSC self-renewal in primary and secondary xenotransplant, with intact lymphoid, myeloid and erythroid repopulation. We conducted gene-edited cell product manufacturing process development and developed conditions using a MaxCyte electroporation instrument achieving mean 97.3±1.8% gene edits and 88.9%±6.4% viability 24 hours after electroporation in 3 engineering runs at clinical scale. We obtained similar results at small-scale with plerixafor-mobilized HSPCs from sickle cell disease (SCD) donors or G-CSF mobilized PBMCs from transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT) donors, including 94.2%±4.4%, 99.5%±0.3% and 91.8%±6.3% of gene edits in engrafting cells from NBSGW 16 week mouse bone marrow of healthy, SCD and TDT donors respectively. Off-target analyses by pooled amplicon sequencing of 601 candidate off-target sites for the +58 and +55 targeting sgRNAs, nominated by a range of computational (CRISPRme) and experimental (GUIDE-seq and ONE-seq) methods, did not identify reference genome off-target edits at a sensitivity of 0.1% allele frequency. We evaluated +58/+55 enhancer combined targeting in nonhuman primates by performing ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation in rhesus macaque mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ HSPCs with autologous re-infusion following busulfan myeloablation. We observed highly efficient gene edit frequency (85.2%, 88.8% and 84.9%) and durable HbF induction (26.4%, 57.5%, and 45.9% F-cells and 12.7%, 41.9%, and 28% gamma-globin) in the peripheral blood in 3 animals at most recent recorded time point post infusion (127, 78, and 54 weeks respectively). Single colony analyses and bulk ddPCR and unidirectional sequencing demonstrated that the long-term engrafting cells displayed a similar distribution of indels, 3.1 kb deletions, and 3.1 kb inversions as the input cell products. Erythroid stress due to hydroxyurea treatment, with or without phlebotomy, was associated with substantially augmented HbF responses (to 75.9%, 88.2%, and 57.8% F-cells and 47.9%, 68%, and 35.7% gamma-globin). No hematologic or other toxicities attributable to gene editing were observed. Together these results suggest that combined BCL11A +58 and +55 erythroid enhancer editing produces highly efficient on-target allelic disruption, erythroid-specific BCL11A downregulation, heightened HbF induction capacity compared to alternative approaches, preserved long-term multilineage engraftment potential by both human xenotransplant and rhesus autotransplant assays, and absence of evident genotoxicity, under clinically relevant SpCas9 RNP electroporation conditions. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
CRISPR gene editing holds great promise to modify somatic genomes to ameliorate disease. In silico prediction of homologous sites coupled with biochemical evaluation of possible genomic off-targets may predict genotoxicity risk of individual gene editing reagents. However, standard computational and biochemical methods focus on reference genomes and do not consider the impact of genetic diversity on off-target potential. Here we developed a web application called CRISPRme that explicitly and efficiently integrates human genetic variant datasets with orthogonal genomic annotations to predict and prioritize off-target sites at scale. The method considers both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels, accounts for bona fide haplotypes, accepts spacer:protospacer mismatches and bulges, and is suitable for personal genome analyses. We tested the tool with a guide RNA (gRNA) targeting the BCL11A erythroid enhancer that has shown therapeutic promise in clinical trials for sickle cell disease (SCD) and β-thalassemia (Frangoul et al. NEJM 2021). We find that the top predicted off-target site is produced by a non-reference allele common in African-ancestry populations (rs114518452, minor allele frequency (MAF) = 4.5%) that introduces a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) for SpCas9. We validate that SpCas9 generates indels (~9.6% frequency) and chr2 pericentric inversions in a strictly allele-specific manner in edited CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), although a high-fidelity Cas9 variant mitigates this off-target. This report illustrates how population and private genetic variants should be considered as modifiers of genome editing outcomes. We expect that variant-aware off-target assessment will be required for therapeutic genome editing efforts going forward, including both ongoing and future clinical trials, and we provide a powerful approach for comprehensive off-target prediction. CRISPRme is available at crisprme.di.univr.it. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.